Claude
Skill
contract-analyzer
Review contracts for concerning clauses, extract key terms, compare to standard terms, and flag unusual provisions. Use when user needs contract review, legal document analysis, or agreement evaluation.
Virus-scanned
Reviewed automatically before listing.
Download
onewave-ai-claude-skills-contract-analyzer-97b5147.zip · 4 KB
Install
skills CLI
npx skills add https://github.com/OneWave-AI/claude-skills/tree/main/contract-analyzer
Claude Code
claude plugin marketplace add https://llmmart.ai/marketplace.json && claude plugin install onewave-ai-claude-skills@llmmart
Git
git clone https://github.com/OneWave-AI/claude-skills.git
The skills CLI installs just this skill, for any of its supported agents. Claude Code installs the whole onewave-ai/claude-skills collection as a plugin from our marketplace. Git is the plain clone.
Skill manifest
Contract Analyzer
Review contracts to surface risks, key terms, and unusual provisions, then recommend negotiation actions.
Contents
references/key-terms.md-- full checklist of terms to extract by categoryreferences/risk-flags.md-- red/yellow flags, standards comparison, commonly missing clausesreferences/output-template.md-- the full analysis report formatreferences/examples.md-- worked examples and best practices
Workflow
- Include this disclaimer in every output: "Legal Disclaimer: This is informational analysis only, not legal advice. Always consult with a qualified attorney for legal matters. Contract interpretation can be complex and jurisdiction-specific."
- Identify the contract type (employment, independent contractor/freelance, NDA, service, partnership, software license, real estate, purchase).
- Extract key terms across financial, duration/termination, intellectual property, liability/indemnification, and other critical categories. See
references/key-terms.md. - Flag concerning clauses as red flags (high risk) or yellow flags (review carefully). See
references/risk-flags.md. - Compare terms to industry standards: note deviations, one-sided provisions, and missing standard protections. See
references/risk-flags.md. - Assess balance: determine whether obligations, penalties, and protections are reciprocal or favor one party.
- Provide actionable recommendations: specific clauses to negotiate, alternative language, questions to ask, terms to add, and deal-breakers.
- Format the report per
references/output-template.md. For worked examples and best practices, seereferences/examples.md.
Files (claude-skills)
-
references
-
examples.md 1.5 KB
# Worked Examples **User**: "Review this freelance contract" **Response**: Identify contract type (independent contractor) -> Extract payment terms, IP ownership, termination -> Flag unlimited indemnification clause -> Note missing late payment terms -> Compare to standard freelance agreements -> Recommend specific negotiations **User**: "Is this NDA reasonable?" **Response**: Analyze confidentiality scope (overly broad, includes "residual knowledge") -> Check duration (perpetual - concerning) -> Review reciprocity (one-way NDA) -> Flag concerning terms -> Suggest mutual NDA with 3-year term **User**: "What should I look out for in this employment agreement?" **Response**: Review compensation, benefits, IP assignment -> Flag broad non-compete (entire industry, 2 years) -> Note missing remote work provisions -> Check termination clauses -> Identify one-sided provisions -> Provide negotiation priorities # Best Practices - Always include the legal disclaimer - Quote specific problematic language - Provide section/clause numbers - Explain why something is concerning (not just that it is) - Offer specific alternative language - Prioritize issues (must-fix vs. nice-to-have) - Compare to industry standards when possible - Note missing standard protections - Consider the user's leverage and circumstances - Provide negotiation talking points - Be specific with recommendations - Highlight positive terms too (not just negative) - Use clear risk indicators ([CRITICAL] [REVIEW] [OK]) - Make output scannable and actionable -
key-terms.md 786 B
# Key Terms to Extract ## Financial Terms - Payment amount and schedule - Rate increases or bonuses - Expense reimbursement - Late payment penalties - Price adjustments ## Duration and Termination - Contract length - Renewal terms (automatic or manual) - Termination conditions - Notice period required - Termination fees or penalties ## Intellectual Property - Work-for-hire provisions - IP ownership (who owns what) - IP assignment clauses - License grants - Pre-existing IP protections ## Liability and Indemnification - Liability caps - Indemnification obligations - Insurance requirements - Warranty disclaimers ## Other Critical Terms - Non-compete clauses - Confidentiality obligations - Dispute resolution (arbitration, jurisdiction) - Governing law - Amendment procedures -
output-template.md 3.8 KB
# Output Template Use risk indicators consistently: [CRITICAL] for red flags, [REVIEW] for yellow flags, [OK] for acceptable terms. ```markdown # Contract Analysis Report **Legal Disclaimer**: This is informational analysis only, not legal advice. Always consult with a qualified attorney for legal matters. ## Contract Overview - **Type**: [Contract type] - **Parties**: [Your company] & [Other party] - **Effective Date**: [Date] - **Term**: [Duration] --- ## Red Flags (Critical Issues) ### 1. Unlimited Personal Liability (Section X) **Clause**: "[Quote problematic language]" **Risk**: You could be personally liable for unlimited damages, even beyond insurance coverage. **Standard Alternative**: Liability should be capped at contract value or insurance limits. **Recommendation**: Negotiate liability cap of $X or insurance policy limit. --- ## Yellow Flags (Concerning Terms) ### 2. 2-Year Non-Compete (Section Y) **Clause**: "[Quote]" **Concern**: Prevents working in your field for 24 months. **Industry Standard**: 6-12 months is more typical for this role. **Recommendation**: Negotiate reduction to 6 months and narrower geographic/industry scope. --- ## Financial Terms | Term | Details | Assessment | |------|---------|------------| | Payment | $X,XXX/month | [OK] Reasonable | | Payment Schedule | Net 60 | [REVIEW] Long (Net 30 preferred) | | Late Fees | None | [REVIEW] Consider adding | | Rate Increases | Annual 3% | [OK] Good | --- ## Key Terms Summary ### Intellectual Property - **Ownership**: [Who owns work product] - **Assessment**: [REVIEW] Clause X assigns all IP, including pre-existing work - **Recommendation**: Add carve-out for pre-existing IP ### Termination - **Notice Period**: 30 days - **Termination for Convenience**: [Yes/No] - **Assessment**: [OK] Reasonable terms ### Confidentiality - **Duration**: 3 years post-termination - **Scope**: [Broad/Narrow] - **Assessment**: [OK] Standard ### Dispute Resolution - **Method**: Mandatory arbitration (JAMS rules) - **Jurisdiction**: [State] - **Assessment**: [REVIEW] Limits court access; may favor large company --- ## Balance Assessment **Overall Balance**: [REVIEW] Somewhat one-sided **Favors**: [Party name] **Issues**: - Termination rights are one-sided (they can terminate for convenience, you cannot) - Indemnification obligations only apply to you - They can amend terms with 30 days notice --- ## Positive Terms 1. Clear payment schedule 2. Reasonable confidentiality duration 3. Insurance requirements are standard 4. IP ownership for pre-existing work protected --- ## Negotiation Recommendations ### Must Negotiate (Deal Critical) 1. **Liability Cap**: Add cap of $XXX,XXX or insurance limits 2. **Non-Compete**: Reduce to 6 months ### Should Negotiate (High Priority) 3. **Payment Terms**: Request Net 30 instead of Net 60 4. **Mutual Termination**: Add for-convenience termination rights for both parties ### Consider Negotiating (Nice to Have) 5. **Arbitration**: Add option for small claims court 6. **Amendment Rights**: Require mutual consent for material changes --- ## Questions to Ask 1. "Can we cap liability at the contract value of $X?" 2. "Would you consider reducing the non-compete period to 6 months?" 3. "Can we adjust payment terms to Net 30?" 4. "Is the mandatory arbitration clause negotiable?" --- ## Missing Clauses Standard provisions not included: - Force majeure clause (pandemic, natural disasters) - Data protection/GDPR compliance - Insurance requirements - Warranty of authority --- ## Overall Recommendation **Risk Level**: [REVIEW] Medium-High **Action**: Do NOT sign as-is. Negotiate key terms (liability cap, non-compete, payment terms) before signing. Consult attorney for review. **Deal Assessment**: [Acceptable if concerns addressed / Proceed with caution / Significant concerns] ``` -
risk-flags.md 1 KB
# Risk Flags ## Red Flags (High Risk) - Unlimited liability - Perpetual non-compete - Automatic renewal without notice - Unreasonable indemnification - One-sided termination rights - Unclear payment terms - Overly broad IP assignment - Waiver of legal rights - Mandatory arbitration (in some contexts) ## Yellow Flags (Review Carefully) - Long non-compete duration - Broad confidentiality scope - Short termination notice - Net 60+ payment terms - Restrictive exclusivity clauses - Unilateral amendment rights ## Comparison to Industry Standards - Note terms that deviate from typical agreements - Identify unusually favorable or unfavorable terms - Flag missing standard protections - Note one-sided provisions ## Balance Assessment Questions - Is the contract heavily favoring one party? - Are obligations reciprocal? - Are penalties balanced? - Are protections mutual? ## Commonly Missing Standard Clauses - Force majeure clause (pandemic, natural disasters) - Data protection/GDPR compliance - Insurance requirements - Warranty of authority
-
-
SKILL.md 1.9 KB
--- name: contract-analyzer description: Review contracts for concerning clauses, extract key terms, compare to standard terms, and flag unusual provisions. Use when user needs contract review, legal document analysis, or agreement evaluation. --- # Contract Analyzer Review contracts to surface risks, key terms, and unusual provisions, then recommend negotiation actions. ## Contents - `references/key-terms.md` -- full checklist of terms to extract by category - `references/risk-flags.md` -- red/yellow flags, standards comparison, commonly missing clauses - `references/output-template.md` -- the full analysis report format - `references/examples.md` -- worked examples and best practices ## Workflow 1. Include this disclaimer in every output: "Legal Disclaimer: This is informational analysis only, not legal advice. Always consult with a qualified attorney for legal matters. Contract interpretation can be complex and jurisdiction-specific." 2. Identify the contract type (employment, independent contractor/freelance, NDA, service, partnership, software license, real estate, purchase). 3. Extract key terms across financial, duration/termination, intellectual property, liability/indemnification, and other critical categories. See `references/key-terms.md`. 4. Flag concerning clauses as red flags (high risk) or yellow flags (review carefully). See `references/risk-flags.md`. 5. Compare terms to industry standards: note deviations, one-sided provisions, and missing standard protections. See `references/risk-flags.md`. 6. Assess balance: determine whether obligations, penalties, and protections are reciprocal or favor one party. 7. Provide actionable recommendations: specific clauses to negotiate, alternative language, questions to ask, terms to add, and deal-breakers. 8. Format the report per `references/output-template.md`. For worked examples and best practices, see `references/examples.md`.
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation.
Reviews (0)
No reviews yet.
No comments yet.