Claude Skill

concurrency-report

Report concurrency and parallelism for a session — how many agents ran in parallel, concurrency-lane utilization, peak parallel width, and serialization bottlenecks (sequential chains that could have run as parallel lanes) — using the Agent Monitor workflow intelligence API. Use

LLM Mart · 0 points · 11 views 0 listing impressions 0 install-command copies
Virus-scanned Reviewed automatically before listing.

Full trust report

Download hoangsonww-claude-code-agent-monitor-plugins_ccam-workflows_skills_concurrency-report-83d4df5.zip · 1 KB
Part of hoangsonww/claude-code-agent-monitor — 86 skills

Install

skills CLI npx skills add https://github.com/hoangsonww/Claude-Code-Agent-Monitor/tree/master/plugins/ccam-workflows/skills/concurrency-report
Claude Code claude plugin marketplace add https://llmmart.ai/marketplace.json && claude plugin install hoangsonww-claude-code-agent-monitor@llmmart
Git git clone https://github.com/hoangsonww/Claude-Code-Agent-Monitor.git

The skills CLI installs just this skill, for any of its supported agents. Claude Code installs the whole hoangsonww/claude-code-agent-monitor collection as a plugin from our marketplace. Git is the plain clone.

Skill manifest

Concurrency Report

Report on parallel execution for one Claude Code session: lanes, peak width, utilization, and where work serialized.

Input

The user provides: $ARGUMENTS

A session ID. If empty, fetch GET /api/sessions?limit=1 and report on the most recent session, stating which one.

Data Sources

Endpoint Returns
GET /api/workflows/{sessionId} The concurrency dataset (overlapping agent execution lanes with start/end timing) and the complexity dataset (numeric score from depth, breadth, and tool diversity)

Report Sections

1. Parallelism Summary

From concurrency: number of distinct lanes, peak parallel width (max agents running simultaneously), and total agents. Pair with the complexity score to judge whether the parallelism matched the work's size. Lanes: N · Peak parallel: M · Agents: K · Complexity: S

2. Lane Timeline

A per-lane list of the agents that occupied each lane in order: Lane 1: explore (0–12s) → code-review (12–48s) Lane 2: debugger (5–30s) Show overlapping windows so simultaneity is visible.

3. Utilization

| Lane | Busy time | Idle time | Utilization % | |------|-----------|-----------|---------------| Plus an overall utilization figure (busy lane-time / total lane-time).

4. Serialization Bottlenecks

Identify sequential chains where one agent waited on the previous despite no apparent dependency — candidates to run as parallel lanes. State the chain and the wall-clock time it cost. Only flag chains the concurrency timing data actually shows as sequential.

Output

  • Markdown tables for utilization; a fenced list for the lane timeline.
  • Durations in human units (e.g. 48s, 2m 10s); percentages to whole numbers.
  • Use ▲/▼ when comparing utilization against an even-distribution baseline.
  • Cite only timing returned by the API; never invent lane overlaps or durations.
  • If the session ran a single agent (no concurrency), say so plainly rather than inventing lanes.
  • If the dashboard is unreachable, tell the user to start it with npm start from the repo root.
Files (claude-code-agent-monitor)
  • agents
    • openai.yaml 278 B
      interface:
        display_name: "Concurrency Report"
        short_description: "Report concurrency and parallelism for a session — how many..."
        default_prompt: "Use $concurrency-report to inspect CCAM data and complete this workflow safely."
      policy:
        allow_implicit_invocation: true
      
  • SKILL.md 2.5 KB
    ---
    name: concurrency-report
    description: >
      Report concurrency and parallelism for a session — how many agents ran in
      parallel, concurrency-lane utilization, peak parallel width, and
      serialization bottlenecks (sequential chains that could have run as parallel
      lanes) — using the Agent Monitor workflow intelligence API. Use when checking
      whether a multi-agent session used parallelism efficiently.
    ---
    
    # Concurrency Report
    
    Report on parallel execution for one Claude Code session: lanes, peak width, utilization, and where work serialized.
    
    ## Input
    
    The user provides: **$ARGUMENTS**
    
    A session ID. If empty, fetch `GET /api/sessions?limit=1` and report on the most recent session, stating which one.
    
    ## Data Sources
    
    | Endpoint | Returns |
    |----------|---------|
    | `GET /api/workflows/{sessionId}` | The `concurrency` dataset (overlapping agent execution lanes with start/end timing) and the `complexity` dataset (numeric score from depth, breadth, and tool diversity) |
    
    ## Report Sections
    
    ### 1. Parallelism Summary
    From `concurrency`: number of distinct lanes, peak parallel width (max agents running simultaneously), and total agents. Pair with the `complexity` score to judge whether the parallelism matched the work's size.
    `Lanes: N · Peak parallel: M · Agents: K · Complexity: S`
    
    ### 2. Lane Timeline
    A per-lane list of the agents that occupied each lane in order:
    `Lane 1: explore (0–12s) → code-review (12–48s)`
    `Lane 2: debugger (5–30s)`
    Show overlapping windows so simultaneity is visible.
    
    ### 3. Utilization
    | Lane | Busy time | Idle time | Utilization % |
    |------|-----------|-----------|---------------|
    Plus an overall utilization figure (busy lane-time / total lane-time).
    
    ### 4. Serialization Bottlenecks
    Identify sequential chains where one agent waited on the previous despite no apparent dependency — candidates to run as parallel lanes. State the chain and the wall-clock time it cost. Only flag chains the `concurrency` timing data actually shows as sequential.
    
    ## Output
    
    - Markdown tables for utilization; a fenced list for the lane timeline.
    - Durations in human units (e.g. `48s`, `2m 10s`); percentages to whole numbers.
    - Use ▲/▼ when comparing utilization against an even-distribution baseline.
    - Cite only timing returned by the API; never invent lane overlaps or durations.
    - If the session ran a single agent (no concurrency), say so plainly rather than inventing lanes.
    - If the dashboard is unreachable, tell the user to start it with `npm start` from the repo root.
    

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation.

No comments yet.

Reviews (0)

No reviews yet.

Related