Claude Skill

community

Use when building or running a persistent two-way community space — Discord, Telegram, Circle: platform choice, structure, onboarding, native→bot→human moderation, rituals, growth loops, health metrics. NOT churn of paying product customers (that is `retention`), NOT broadcast em

LLM Mart · 0 points · 0 views 0 listing impressions 0 install-command copies
Virus-scanned Reviewed automatically before listing.

Full trust report

Download ericrisco-rsc-harness-skills_community-953fef5.zip · 14 KB
Part of ericrisco/rsc-harness — 46 skills

Install

skills CLI npx skills add https://github.com/ericrisco/rsc-harness/tree/main/skills/community
Claude Code claude plugin marketplace add https://llmmart.ai/marketplace.json && claude plugin install ericrisco-rsc-harness@llmmart
Git git clone https://github.com/ericrisco/rsc-harness.git

The skills CLI installs just this skill, for any of its supported agents. Claude Code installs the whole ericrisco/rsc-harness collection as a plugin from our marketplace. Git is the plain clone.

Skill manifest

community

Run the community like a product with a job, not a vanity chat room. The space — a Discord server, a Telegram group+channel, a Circle — is the product. Onboarding is activation, rituals are the feature, moderation is reliability, and one north-star metric tied to your purpose is the only number that matters. A room with 5,000 silent members is a failed product, not a big one. Design the system around the conversation, not the conversation itself.

When NOT to use — route instead

The ask Route to
Stop paying customers of a product/SaaS from churning (win-back, lifecycle, NPS) retention
Write the one-to-many broadcast email that nurtures the list ../newsletter/SKILL.md
Schedule / cross-post public posts across X, LinkedIn, Instagram ../social-publisher/SKILL.md
Run a single timed live event end-to-end (registration, speakers, replay) webinar
Build an automated support desk / ticket triage customer-support
Actually code or host the Discord/Telegram bot (gateway, slash handlers) whatsapp-telegram, automation-flows
Define the voice/name/tone the community speaks in ../brand-voice/SKILL.md

You own the persistent, two-way space and its ongoing operating rhythm. The boundary that bites most: retention keeps buyers of a product from churning; you keep members of a shared space active and contributing. They rhyme (cohorts, re-activation) but the subject differs — a SaaS seat vs a Discord membership.

Step 0 — Purpose & north-star gate

Do not design a single channel until you have (a) a one-line purpose and (b) one business metric tied to it. Why: a community without a job becomes a dead chat — there is no signal to design toward, so you sprawl channels and beg for activity. This is the most common cause of graveyards.

If either is missing, STOP and ask one focused batch, then proceed:

  1. In one sentence, what is this community for — and for whom?
  2. What single business outcome does it move? (support deflection, retention uplift, expansion revenue, qualified referrals — pick ONE)

Bad → Good:

Bad:  "Set up a Discord for our users." → 14 channels, no purpose, silent in 3 weeks.
Good: Purpose = "where indie game-devs trade WIP feedback so free players become paying supporters."
      North-star = monthly free→supporter conversions sourced from the server.

Everything below is derived from those two lines. If a channel, ritual, or metric does not serve the purpose or move the north-star, cut it.

Pick the platform — decision table

Platform Best for Real-time chat Broadcast Monetization Moderation maturity Cost
Discord Active, real-time builder/gamer/dev communities Strong Weak (announcement channels only) Indirect (roles/Patreon links) High — native AutoMod + bot ecosystem Free
Telegram (group + channel hybrid) Mobile-first, fast-growing, announce-heavy audiences Good Strong (channel = one-way broadcast) Weak native Medium — native ML anti-spam >200 members + bots Free
Circle Paid memberships bundling courses/events Weak Good Strong (built-in payments + tiered Spaces) Medium Professional ~$89–129/mo → Business ~$199–219 → Circle Plus ~$419+ + 0.5–2% Circle fee on top of Stripe's 2.9%+$0.30

Decision rules (pick the purpose, not the logo):

  • Need persistent real-time conversation and free? → Discord. It is the deepest moderation toolset and the strongest two-way default.
  • Audience lives on mobile and you broadcast a lot? → Telegram, run the hybrid: a channel for announcements + a linked group for discussion. This is the 2026 standard; a bare group has no broadcast lane and a bare channel has no conversation.
  • You are charging for membership and bundling courses/events? → Circle. But see the anti-pattern: do not monetize before activation works.

Per-platform setup depth (AutoMod filters, verification levels, anti-spam tiers, plan ladder) is in references/platform-playbooks.md.

Structure & onboarding = activation

Keep the structure minimal. Why: empty channels signal a dead room; people pattern-match "nobody's here" and leave. Start with the fewest channels the purpose needs (often 4–6: welcome/rules, intros, one core topic, help, off-topic, announcements) and split a channel only when an existing one is demonstrably overflowing.

The onboarding path is an activation funnel. Drive every new member to a first meaningful action through a short, gated path:

  1. Role-on-join — pick a role/interest, which personalizes which channels they see. Why: a tailored, smaller room feels alive; the firehose feels dead.
  2. Rules/membership gate — on Discord, Rules Screening / Membership Screening blocks talking and DMs until rules are acknowledged. Why: it stops drive-by spam and forces a first deliberate click.
  3. Intro with a prompt — not "introduce yourself" (blank-page freeze) but a 3-field prompt. Why: prompted intros get answered; open ones get skipped.
  4. Point to where-to-ask — one obvious channel for "I need help." Why: time-to-first-response is a core health metric and it starts here.

Bad → Good intro channel:

Bad:  #introductions — "Say hi and introduce yourself!"  → blank-page paralysis, 4% post.
Good: #introductions — pinned prompt: "(1) what you're building, (2) what you're stuck on,
       (3) one thing you can help others with." → reply with the right role-ping. Activation jumps.

Moderation — the 3-layer stack

Moderation is reliability. The canonical stack is native → bot → human, and you scale layers by size, never skip the native layer.

  1. Native — Discord AutoMod (one Commonly-Flagged-Words preset rule + up to 6 custom keyword rules, each filter holding up to 1,000 terms, plus a mention-spam cap configurable up to 50 unique mentions/message) and an explicit verification level (Medium = verified email + 5-min-on-server before talking). Telegram: native ML anti-spam kicks in for groups >200 members (with an "Aggressive" auto-delete mode); for ≤30 messages/hour, slow-mode alone is the right zero-setup control; add a CAPTCHA-on-join gate (button/math/question, e.g. Shieldy) as the raid wall.
  2. Bot — a specialized moderation bot for raid detection, scam-link filtering, and audit logs.
  3. Human — named mods, an escalation path, and a written ban policy.

Size-tiered config (Discord, per Discord's own size guidance):

Server size Native Bot layer Human
< 1,000 AutoMod + Medium verification optional 1–2 mods
> 1,000 AutoMod + custom keyword rules add one specialized bot rota of mods
> 10,000 + Commonly-Flagged filter on robust multi-tool bots mod team + on-call
> 100,000 full filters + raid mode multiple specialized bots tiered mod org

Incident + ban policy (write these down before you need them):

  • Ban policy is a rubric, not a mood — define warn → mute → kick → ban thresholds and what triggers each. Why: inconsistent bans destroy trust faster than the spam did.
  • Raid runbook — who flips lockdown (slow-mode + raise verification + pause invites), who triages, where it is logged.
  • Scam-DM stance — pin a "we will never DM you first" notice; AutoMod-flag known scam phrases.

Filter specifics, verification levels, and bot picks by tier live in references/platform-playbooks.md.

Rituals — the operating rhythm

Predictable cadence beats sporadic heroics. Why: members learn when to show up only if there is something to show up for; rhythm is the feature that pulls lurkers back. Install a small set of recurring beats and run them on time, every time.

Sample weekly cadence:

Day Ritual Friction
Mon "What are you working on this week?" thread Low — one reply
Wed Office hours / AMA in a voice or thread slot Medium — opt-in
Fri "Wins of the week" — share + react Low — a reaction counts

Design for low-friction participation: polls, emoji reactions, and opt-in role pings. The over-pinging trap: blasting @everyone for non-urgent posts. Why it backfires — over-pinging trains members to mute the server, and a muted member is functionally gone. Use a dedicated opt-in "announcements" role and reserve @everyone for genuine all-hands moments.

A ritual template library and the full cadence rationale are in references/metrics-and-rituals.md.

Growth — loops, not buys

Build loops that compound, not headcount that decays:

  • Referral loop — make inviting a friend a one-tap, rewarded action tied to a role/perk.
  • Intro loop — every prompted intro is a hook other members reply to, pulling the newcomer into a thread on day one.
  • Partner cross-post — trade shout-outs with an adjacent community whose audience overlaps but does not compete.

90-9-1 is a range, not a ceiling. The old "1% rule" (90% lurk, 9% occasional, 1% drive activity) is a starting observation, not a law — healthier communities skew far more active (real profiles like 55-30-15 and 17-57-26). Design to move lurkers up a tier (prompts, easy reactions, direct asks), do not accept 90% lurkers as fixed.

Bad:  Buy 2,000 members from a growth service to "look big."  → DAU/MAU craters,
       signal drowns in silence, real members read the room as dead and leave.
Good: Run a referral ritual + prompted intros. 200 members who each reply
       in week one beats 2,000 who never speak.

Bought or inactive members are negative-value: they dilute every signal, wreck DAU/MAU, and make the room look dead to the people you actually want.

Metrics & health

Three clusters plus exactly one business metric. Steer on these, not on raw member count.

Metric What it tells you Target
DAU/MAU stickiness How often members come back Floor ≥ 20%; social/messaging band ~50–80%
30/60/90-day cohort retention Whether onboarding actually activates Track each cohort vs the last
Returning-member ratio Rhythm is working Trending up
Time-to-first-response (TTFR) A newcomer's first experience Minutes-to-low-hours, the lower the better
Answered rate Questions don't die unanswered → 100%
One business metric (purpose-tied) The only number that justifies the work Set in Step 0

The one business metric is a menu — pick exactly one that matches your purpose: support deflection, retention uplift, expansion revenue, or qualified referrals. Review the scorecard on a fixed cadence (weekly glance, monthly cohort read). Benchmark depth and metric definitions are in references/metrics-and-rituals.md.

The artifact you emit

Produce two files the user can apply directly: a community-plan.md (prose: purpose, platform rationale, structure, growth, metrics) and a machine-checkable moderation-config.yaml:

platform: discord            # discord | telegram | circle
purpose: "where indie game-devs trade WIP feedback so free players become paying supporters"
north_star_metric: "monthly free→supporter conversions sourced from the server"
onboarding_path:
  - role-on-join
  - rules-gate
  - prompted-intro
  - where-to-ask
moderation:
  layers:
    native: "AutoMod preset + custom keyword rules, Medium verification"
    bot: "specialized raid + scam-link bot"
    human: "2 named mods, written ban rubric"
rituals:
  - name: "WIP Mondays"
    cadence: "weekly"
  - name: "Wins Fridays"
    cadence: "weekly"

Then validate it:

scripts/verify.sh path/to/moderation-config.yaml

verify.sh checks the required keys exist, that north_star_metric is non-empty, that all three moderation layers are declared, and that at least one ritual has a cadence — it catches the most common defect (a "plan" with no purpose, no mod layers, or no rhythm). Do not go live until it passes and the north-star plus at least one health metric (TTFR or DAU/MAU) are instrumented.

Anti-patterns

Anti-pattern Why it fails Do instead
Channel sprawl on day one Empty channels read as "dead"; people leave Start 4–6; split only on demonstrated overflow
No purpose / no north-star Nothing to design toward → graveyard Run Step 0 gate before any structure
@everyone for non-urgent posts Trains members to mute → functionally gone Opt-in announce role; reserve @everyone
Buying members to "look big" Negative-value: dilutes signal, wrecks DAU/MAU Referral + intro loops; activate the real ones
Ban-by-mood Inconsistency destroys trust Written warn→mute→kick→ban rubric
Treating 90% lurkers as permanent Leaves activation on the table 90-9-1 is a range; move lurkers up a tier
Monetizing on Circle before activation works Charging for a dead room churns instantly Prove rhythm + retention, then gate/monetize
Broadcasting in a two-way space Wrong tool; kills conversation One-to-many → ../newsletter/SKILL.md / ../social-publisher/SKILL.md
Files (rsc-harness)
  • evals
    • cases.yaml 2.8 KB
      skill: community
      
      should_trigger:
        - prompt: "Set up our Discord server for the SaaS user community — channels, roles, and rules."
          why: Core stand-up job — structure + onboarding + moderation for a persistent two-way space.
        - prompt: "Our Telegram group is a graveyard, nobody posts anymore. How do we revive it?"
          why: Non-obvious — no setup words, but it is a dead two-way space needing rituals + re-activation, the heart of this skill.
        - prompt: "We keep getting spam raids and scam-DM waves in our community — lock it down."
          why: Moderation / incident response (native + bot + human stack, raid runbook) is owned here.
        - prompt: "Should we run our paid membership on Circle or just use Discord?"
          why: Platform decision including monetization — the decision table routes this.
        - prompt: "La comunitat de Discord està morta, ningú escriu — com la reactivem?"
          why: Catalan phrasing for a graveyard re-activation; rituals + growth loops.
        - prompt: "How do I get the lurkers in our community to actually post something?"
          why: Lurker-to-contributor growth (90-9-1 is a range, move members up a tier) is a core job.
      
      should_not_trigger:
        - prompt: "Our SaaS users keep cancelling in month 2 — build a win-back and churn-reduction flow."
          route_to: retention
          why: Paying-customer churn of a product, not activity in a shared member space.
        - prompt: "Write this week's broadcast email to our subscriber list."
          route_to: newsletter
          why: One-to-many opted-in email, not a two-way persistent space.
        - prompt: "Schedule and cross-post our launch announcement across X, LinkedIn, and Instagram."
          route_to: social-publisher
          why: Public-feed posting, not a community space.
        - prompt: "Run our product-launch webinar end-to-end: registration page, speakers, and replay."
          route_to: webinar
          why: A single timed live event, not a persistent two-way space.
      
      capability:
        - scenario: "Stand up a Discord community for an indie game-dev audience whose business goal is converting free players into paying supporters."
          must_include:
            - States or extracts a one-line purpose AND one north-star business metric before designing anything (Step 0 gate).
            - Justifies Discord over Telegram and Circle for this audience using the decision rules.
            - Minimal channel set (no sprawl) + role-on-join + an onboarding "first meaningful action" path with the rules/membership gate.
            - 3-layer moderation — native AutoMod + a verification level, a bot, and human mods — sized to expected scale.
            - At least one weekly ritual with an explicit cadence.
            - Names the one business metric plus at least one health metric (e.g. TTFR or DAU/MAU ≥20% floor).
            - Emits a community-plan.md + moderation-config artifact and references scripts/verify.sh.
      
    • README.md 995 B
      # Evals — community
      
      `cases.yaml` is a judging harness, not an executable test suite. Run it with a human or an LLM judge. The `should_trigger` and `should_not_trigger` cases check routing discipline: each `should_trigger` prompt should pull in this skill (including the non-obvious "graveyard" and Catalan phrasings), and each `should_not_trigger` prompt should route to the named sibling (`retention`, `newsletter`, `social-publisher`, `webinar`) instead of here. The `capability` case is run end-to-end against a real session: give the agent the scenario and score the response against the `must_include` rubric — every bullet must be satisfied (purpose+north-star gate, platform rationale, onboarding path, 3-layer moderation, a ritual with cadence, the metrics, and the emitted artifact validated by `scripts/verify.sh`). Structural defects in the emitted `moderation-config` are caught mechanically by `scripts/verify.sh`; the rubric covers the process rigor that no script can check.
      
  • references
    • metrics-and-rituals.md 3.5 KB
      # Metrics & rituals
      
      The health scorecard and the operating-rhythm library. Use this with the Metrics and Rituals sections of `../SKILL.md`. Facts carry source + access date.
      
      ## The metric clusters
      
      Metrics cluster into three groups plus exactly one business metric tied to your Step-0 purpose.
      
      ### Cluster 1 — activation / retention
      - **DAU / WAU / MAU** and **stickiness = DAU/MAU**. Benchmark band for social/messaging products is **~50–80%**; treat **≥ 20% as a floor** for a healthy community. Below 20% the room is decaying.
      - **30 / 60 / 90-day cohort retention** — track each join-cohort's survival; it is the truest read on whether onboarding actually activates.
      - **Returning-member ratio** — share of members who came back this period; the direct signal that rituals are working.
      
      ### Cluster 2 — member value
      - **Time-to-first-response (TTFR)** — how long until a newcomer's first post gets a reply. Lower is better; this is the newcomer's first lived experience of the room.
      - **Answered rate** — share of questions that get any answer. Drive toward 100%; unanswered questions teach members not to ask.
      
      ### Cluster 3 — exactly ONE business metric
      Pick **one** that matches the purpose, and only one:
      - **Support deflection** — questions answered by members vs tickets filed.
      - **Retention uplift** — product retention of members vs non-members.
      - **Expansion revenue** — upgrades/supporter conversions sourced from the space.
      - **Qualified referrals** — warm intros / leads the community generates.
      
      Source: Bevy *Top 11 Community Engagement Metrics for 2025*, Discourse *20 Community Metrics Explained* (2025-04), Geckoboard *DAU/MAU*, accessed 2026-06-02.
      
      ## The 90-9-1 reality
      
      - **Participation inequality / "1% rule":** ~**90% lurk, 9% contribute occasionally, 1% drive most activity** — but this is a **range, not a law**.
      - Healthier communities skew far more active: observed profiles like **55-30-15** and **17-57-26**.
      - Design implication: **do not accept 90% lurkers as fixed.** Move lurkers up a tier with prompts, one-tap reactions, and direct asks.
      - Source: NN/g *Participation Inequality* (Nielsen) + Higher Logic *90-9-1 … Officially Outdated*, accessed 2026-06-02.
      
      ## Ritual template library
      
      Predictable cadence beats sporadic effort. Run each on time, every time; consistency is the whole point.
      
      | Ritual | Cadence | Friction | What it produces |
      |---|---|---|---|
      | "What are you working on?" thread | Weekly (Mon) | Low — one reply | Re-engagement hook, surfaces who's active |
      | Office hours / AMA | Weekly (Wed) | Medium — opt-in | High-value 1:1-in-public, answered-rate boost |
      | "Wins of the week" | Weekly (Fri) | Low — a reaction counts | Positive loop, social proof |
      | Monthly show-and-tell / demo day | Monthly | Medium | Deepens the 1%/9%, content for announcements |
      | Onboarding "intro Tuesday" round-up | Weekly | Low | Pulls new members into threads day one |
      | Poll of the week | Weekly | Very low — one tap | Cheap participation for lurkers |
      
      ### Sample weekly calendar
      ```text
      Mon  WIP thread posted 09:00 local
      Wed  Office hours 17:00–18:00 (opt-in @office-hours role)
      Fri  Wins thread + react-to-celebrate
      Sun  (mod) scorecard glance: TTFR, answered rate, new-member activation
      ```
      
      ### Low-friction participation rules
      - Prefer **reactions and polls** over "write a paragraph" — every tier can participate.
      - Use **opt-in role pings** for ritual reminders; never `@everyone` for routine beats (over-pinging trains mutes, and a muted member is functionally gone).
      - Reserve `@everyone` for genuine all-hands moments only.
      
    • platform-playbooks.md 4.8 KB
      # Platform playbooks
      
      Per-platform setup depth. Pick the platform with the decision table in `../SKILL.md`; this file is the build manual for each. Every load-bearing fact carries its source + access date.
      
      ## Discord — the real-time default
      
      ### AutoMod (native layer)
      - **Keyword filters**: one **Commonly-Flagged-Words preset rule** (`KEYWORD_PRESET`: Insults & Slurs, Sexual Content, Severe Profanity), **1 per guild**, **plus up to 6 custom keyword rules** (`KEYWORD` trigger), each filter holding **up to 1,000 terms** (60 chars each). Use a custom rule for your scam-phrase blocklist and link patterns. Note: the "1,000" is the per-rule *filter* size; do not confuse it with the 100-entry cap on a `KEYWORD` rule's per-rule *allow_list* (exception terms).
      - **Mention-spam cap** (`MENTION_SPAM`, 1 per guild): configurable up to **50 unique role/user mentions per message** before AutoMod acts. Set this low (e.g. 5) for raid resistance.
      - Actions per rule: block message, alert a mod channel, timeout the author. Always route a copy to a private `#mod-log`.
      - Source: Discord — *Auto Moderation* developer docs (docs.discord.com/developers/resources/auto-moderation) + *AutoMod FAQ* (support.discord.com), accessed 2026-06-02.
      
      ### Verification levels
      - Set **Medium** as the baseline: verified email + member for >5 minutes before talking. **High** adds a 10-minute server-tenure requirement; **Highest** requires a verified phone. Raise the level temporarily during a raid (the "lockdown" lever).
      
      ### Rules Screening / Membership Screening
      - Gates **talking and DMs** until a new member explicitly acknowledges the rules. This both stops drive-by spam and forces the first deliberate click of the onboarding funnel.
      - Pair with **Onboarding** (role/interest selection on join) so the rules-ack flows straight into role-on-join → personalized channels.
      - Source: Discord — *Rules Screening FAQ* + community-building playbooks, accessed 2026-06-02.
      
      ### Layered defense by size (Discord's own guidance)
      | Size | Recommended stack |
      |---|---|
      | Small (< 1,000) | Native AutoMod + Medium verification |
      | > 1,000 | Add a specialized moderation bot + custom keyword rules |
      | > 10,000 | Robust multi-tool bots + Commonly-Flagged filters on |
      | > 100,000 | Multiple specialized bots + tiered human mod org |
      - Canonical 3-layer stack everywhere: **native tools → bot automod → human mods**.
      - Source: Discord safety guidance summarized in friendify.net *Discord Moderation & AutoMod Complete Guide (2025)*, accessed 2026-06-02.
      
      ## Telegram — mobile-first, broadcast-heavy
      
      ### The hybrid pattern (2026 standard)
      - **Groups = two-way conversation; channels = one-way broadcast.** A bare group has no clean announce lane; a bare channel has no conversation. Run a **channel for announcements + a linked discussion group** so each post can spawn a thread.
      - Source: Metricgram — *Telegram Group vs Channel*, accessed 2026-06-02.
      
      ### Native anti-spam + slow-mode
      - **Native ML anti-spam activates for groups > 200 members**, with an **"Aggressive" mode** that auto-deletes suspected spam. Below that threshold it is unavailable.
      - For low-traffic groups (**≤ 30 messages/hour**), **slow-mode alone** is the recommended zero-setup control — no bot needed.
      - Source: Metricgram — *Best Telegram Anti-Spam Bots* / *Supergroups Explained*, accessed 2026-06-02.
      
      ### Raid gate
      - **CAPTCHA-on-join** is the standard raid wall: button / math / question challenge (e.g. **Shieldy**). New accounts must pass before they can post.
      - Source: Metricgram — *Anti-Spam Bots*, accessed 2026-06-02.
      
      ## Circle — the paid / monetized end
      
      ### Spaces and structure
      - Content is organized into **Spaces**, which structure **tiered membership** and bundle **courses and events**. This is the monetization primitive — gate Spaces by paid tier.
      
      ### 2026 plan ladder + fees
      Circle **discontinued the old "Basic" tier** — **Professional is now the entry plan**.
      
      | Plan | Approx monthly | Circle transaction fee |
      |---|---|---|
      | Professional (entry) | ~$89 annual / ~$129 monthly | 2% |
      | Business | ~$199 annual / ~$219 monthly | 1% |
      | Circle Plus (Enterprise, custom) | ~$419+ | 0.5% |
      - The transaction fee is **tiered 0.5%–2%** (2% Professional, 1% Business, 0.5% Circle Plus) and is charged by Circle **on top of Stripe's standard 2.9% + $0.30** per transaction — budget both layers when modeling take rate.
      - **Real-time chat is weaker than Discord** — choose Circle for monetized membership + content bundling, not for fast live conversation.
      - Source: Circle.so *Pricing* (circle.so/pricing) summarized in SchoolMaker *Circle.so Pricing 2026*, accessed 2026-06-02.
      
      ### Monetization gating
      - Do **not** monetize before activation works. Charging for a dead room produces instant churn. Prove rhythm + cohort retention on the free or trial tier first, then gate the high-value Spaces.
      
  • scripts
    • verify.sh 2.8 KB
      #!/usr/bin/env bash
      # verify.sh — structural check for a community moderation-config artifact.
      # Read-only. Validates required keys, a non-empty north-star, all 3 moderation
      # layers, and at least one ritual with a cadence. Exits 0 on a clean/empty target.
      #
      # Usage: scripts/verify.sh [path/to/moderation-config.yaml|.json]
      # If no path is given, scans the working tree for moderation-config.{yaml,yml,json}.
      # No target found => nothing to check => exit 0 (no false failure).
      
      set -euo pipefail
      
      fail() { echo "FAIL: $1" >&2; exit 1; }
      ok()   { echo "OK: $1"; }
      
      # --- resolve targets -------------------------------------------------------
      targets=()
      if [ "$#" -ge 1 ]; then
        for arg in "$@"; do
          [ -f "$arg" ] || fail "no such file: $arg"
          targets+=("$arg")
        done
      else
        while IFS= read -r f; do targets+=("$f"); done < <(
          find . -type f \( -name 'moderation-config.yaml' -o -name 'moderation-config.yml' -o -name 'moderation-config.json' \) 2>/dev/null
        )
      fi
      
      if [ "${#targets[@]}" -eq 0 ]; then
        echo "OK: no moderation-config artifact found — nothing to verify."
        exit 0
      fi
      
      # --- per-file checks -------------------------------------------------------
      check_file() {
        local file="$1"
        local body
        body="$(cat "$file")"
      
        # Parse-only sanity for JSON; YAML is checked line-wise via grep below.
        case "$file" in
          *.json)
            if command -v python3 >/dev/null 2>&1; then
              python3 -c "import json,sys; json.load(open(sys.argv[1]))" "$file" \
                || fail "$file is not valid JSON"
            fi
            ;;
        esac
      
        # required top-level / nested keys (token presence is enough for the structural gate)
        local required=(platform purpose north_star_metric onboarding_path moderation rituals)
        local k
        for k in "${required[@]}"; do
          grep -Eq "(\"$k\"[[:space:]]*:|^[[:space:]]*$k[[:space:]]*:)" <<<"$body" \
            || fail "$file is missing required key: $k"
        done
      
        # north_star_metric must be non-empty (the no-purpose defect)
        local nsm
        nsm="$(grep -E "(\"north_star_metric\"|north_star_metric)[[:space:]]*:" <<<"$body" \
              | head -n1 | sed -E 's/.*north_star_metric"?[[:space:]]*:[[:space:]]*//' \
              | tr -d '",' | sed -E 's/^[[:space:]]+//; s/[[:space:]]+$//')"
        [ -n "$nsm" ] || fail "$file has an empty north_star_metric"
      
        # moderation must declare all three layers
        local layer
        for layer in native bot human; do
          grep -Eq "(\"$layer\"[[:space:]]*:|^[[:space:]]*$layer[[:space:]]*:)" <<<"$body" \
            || fail "$file moderation does not declare the '$layer' layer"
        done
      
        # at least one ritual with a non-empty cadence
        grep -Eq "(\"cadence\"|cadence)[[:space:]]*:[[:space:]]*[\"']?[[:alnum:]]" <<<"$body" \
          || fail "$file has no ritual with a non-empty cadence"
      
        ok "$file passed all structural checks."
      }
      
      for t in "${targets[@]}"; do
        check_file "$t"
      done
      
      echo "OK: all ${#targets[@]} artifact(s) verified."
      exit 0
      
  • SKILL.md 13.6 KB
    ---
    name: community
    description: "Use when building or running a persistent two-way community space — Discord, Telegram, Circle: platform choice, structure, onboarding, native→bot→human moderation, rituals, growth loops, health metrics. NOT churn of paying product customers (that is `retention`), NOT broadcast email (that is `newsletter`), NOT one live event (that is `webinar`)."
    tags: [community, discord, telegram, moderation, growth, rituals]
    recommends: [retention, newsletter, social-publisher, brand-voice, whatsapp-telegram, webinar]
    profiles: []
    origin: risco
    ---
    
    # community
    
    Run the community like a **product with a job**, not a vanity chat room. The space — a Discord server, a Telegram group+channel, a Circle — is the product. **Onboarding is activation, rituals are the feature, moderation is reliability, and one north-star metric tied to your purpose is the only number that matters.** A room with 5,000 silent members is a failed product, not a big one. Design the system around the conversation, not the conversation itself.
    
    ## When NOT to use — route instead
    
    | The ask | Route to |
    |---|---|
    | Stop *paying customers of a product/SaaS* from churning (win-back, lifecycle, NPS) | `retention` |
    | Write the one-to-many broadcast email that nurtures the list | `../newsletter/SKILL.md` |
    | Schedule / cross-post public posts across X, LinkedIn, Instagram | `../social-publisher/SKILL.md` |
    | Run a single timed live event end-to-end (registration, speakers, replay) | `webinar` |
    | Build an automated support desk / ticket triage | `customer-support` |
    | Actually code or host the Discord/Telegram bot (gateway, slash handlers) | `whatsapp-telegram`, `automation-flows` |
    | Define the voice/name/tone the community speaks in | `../brand-voice/SKILL.md` |
    
    You own the **persistent, two-way space and its ongoing operating rhythm.** The boundary that bites most: `retention` keeps *buyers of a product* from churning; you keep *members of a shared space* active and contributing. They rhyme (cohorts, re-activation) but the subject differs — a SaaS seat vs a Discord membership.
    
    ## Step 0 — Purpose & north-star gate
    
    **Do not design a single channel until you have (a) a one-line purpose and (b) one business metric tied to it.** Why: a community without a job becomes a dead chat — there is no signal to design toward, so you sprawl channels and beg for activity. This is the most common cause of graveyards.
    
    If either is missing, **STOP and ask one focused batch**, then proceed:
    
    > 1. In one sentence, what is this community *for* — and for whom?
    > 2. What single business outcome does it move? (support deflection, retention uplift, expansion revenue, qualified referrals — pick ONE)
    
    Bad → Good:
    
    ```text
    Bad:  "Set up a Discord for our users." → 14 channels, no purpose, silent in 3 weeks.
    Good: Purpose = "where indie game-devs trade WIP feedback so free players become paying supporters."
          North-star = monthly free→supporter conversions sourced from the server.
    ```
    
    Everything below is derived from those two lines. If a channel, ritual, or metric does not serve the purpose or move the north-star, cut it.
    
    ## Pick the platform — decision table
    
    | Platform | Best for | Real-time chat | Broadcast | Monetization | Moderation maturity | Cost |
    |---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
    | **Discord** | Active, real-time builder/gamer/dev communities | Strong | Weak (announcement channels only) | Indirect (roles/Patreon links) | High — native AutoMod + bot ecosystem | Free |
    | **Telegram** (group **+** channel hybrid) | Mobile-first, fast-growing, announce-heavy audiences | Good | Strong (channel = one-way broadcast) | Weak native | Medium — native ML anti-spam >200 members + bots | Free |
    | **Circle** | Paid memberships bundling courses/events | Weak | Good | Strong (built-in payments + tiered Spaces) | Medium | Professional ~$89–129/mo → Business ~$199–219 → Circle Plus ~$419+ + 0.5–2% Circle fee on top of Stripe's 2.9%+$0.30 |
    
    Decision rules (pick the *purpose*, not the logo):
    - **Need persistent real-time conversation and free?** → Discord. It is the deepest moderation toolset and the strongest two-way default.
    - **Audience lives on mobile and you broadcast a lot?** → Telegram, run the hybrid: a **channel** for announcements + a **linked group** for discussion. This is the 2026 standard; a bare group has no broadcast lane and a bare channel has no conversation.
    - **You are charging for membership and bundling courses/events?** → Circle. But see the anti-pattern: do not monetize before activation works.
    
    Per-platform setup depth (AutoMod filters, verification levels, anti-spam tiers, plan ladder) is in `references/platform-playbooks.md`.
    
    ## Structure & onboarding = activation
    
    Keep the structure **minimal**. Why: empty channels signal a dead room; people pattern-match "nobody's here" and leave. Start with the fewest channels the purpose needs (often 4–6: welcome/rules, intros, one core topic, help, off-topic, announcements) and split a channel only when an existing one is *demonstrably overflowing*.
    
    The onboarding path is an activation funnel. Drive every new member to a **first meaningful action** through a short, gated path:
    
    1. **Role-on-join** — pick a role/interest, which personalizes which channels they see. Why: a tailored, smaller room feels alive; the firehose feels dead.
    2. **Rules/membership gate** — on Discord, Rules Screening / Membership Screening blocks talking and DMs until rules are acknowledged. Why: it stops drive-by spam *and* forces a first deliberate click.
    3. **Intro with a prompt** — not "introduce yourself" (blank-page freeze) but a 3-field prompt. Why: prompted intros get answered; open ones get skipped.
    4. **Point to where-to-ask** — one obvious channel for "I need help." Why: time-to-first-response is a core health metric and it starts here.
    
    Bad → Good intro channel:
    
    ```text
    Bad:  #introductions — "Say hi and introduce yourself!"  → blank-page paralysis, 4% post.
    Good: #introductions — pinned prompt: "(1) what you're building, (2) what you're stuck on,
           (3) one thing you can help others with." → reply with the right role-ping. Activation jumps.
    ```
    
    ## Moderation — the 3-layer stack
    
    Moderation is reliability. The canonical stack is **native → bot → human**, and you scale layers by size, never skip the native layer.
    
    1. **Native** — Discord AutoMod (one Commonly-Flagged-Words preset rule + up to 6 custom keyword rules, each filter holding up to 1,000 terms, plus a mention-spam cap configurable up to 50 unique mentions/message) and an explicit **verification level** (Medium = verified email + 5-min-on-server before talking). Telegram: native ML anti-spam kicks in for groups **>200 members** (with an "Aggressive" auto-delete mode); for **≤30 messages/hour, slow-mode alone** is the right zero-setup control; add a CAPTCHA-on-join gate (button/math/question, e.g. Shieldy) as the raid wall.
    2. **Bot** — a specialized moderation bot for raid detection, scam-link filtering, and audit logs.
    3. **Human** — named mods, an escalation path, and a written ban policy.
    
    Size-tiered config (Discord, per Discord's own size guidance):
    
    | Server size | Native | Bot layer | Human |
    |---|---|---|---|
    | < 1,000 | AutoMod + Medium verification | optional | 1–2 mods |
    | > 1,000 | AutoMod + custom keyword rules | add one specialized bot | rota of mods |
    | > 10,000 | + Commonly-Flagged filter on | robust multi-tool bots | mod team + on-call |
    | > 100,000 | full filters + raid mode | multiple specialized bots | tiered mod org |
    
    Incident + ban policy (write these down before you need them):
    - **Ban policy is a rubric, not a mood** — define warn → mute → kick → ban thresholds and what triggers each. Why: inconsistent bans destroy trust faster than the spam did.
    - **Raid runbook** — who flips lockdown (slow-mode + raise verification + pause invites), who triages, where it is logged.
    - **Scam-DM stance** — pin a "we will never DM you first" notice; AutoMod-flag known scam phrases.
    
    Filter specifics, verification levels, and bot picks by tier live in `references/platform-playbooks.md`.
    
    ## Rituals — the operating rhythm
    
    **Predictable cadence beats sporadic heroics.** Why: members learn when to show up only if there is something to show up *for*; rhythm is the feature that pulls lurkers back. Install a small set of recurring beats and run them on time, every time.
    
    Sample weekly cadence:
    
    | Day | Ritual | Friction |
    |---|---|---|
    | Mon | "What are you working on this week?" thread | Low — one reply |
    | Wed | Office hours / AMA in a voice or thread slot | Medium — opt-in |
    | Fri | "Wins of the week" — share + react | Low — a reaction counts |
    
    Design for **low-friction participation**: polls, emoji reactions, and *opt-in* role pings. The over-pinging trap: blasting `@everyone` for non-urgent posts. Why it backfires — over-pinging trains members to mute the server, and a muted member is functionally gone. Use a dedicated opt-in "announcements" role and reserve `@everyone` for genuine all-hands moments.
    
    A ritual template library and the full cadence rationale are in `references/metrics-and-rituals.md`.
    
    ## Growth — loops, not buys
    
    Build loops that compound, not headcount that decays:
    - **Referral loop** — make inviting a friend a one-tap, rewarded action tied to a role/perk.
    - **Intro loop** — every prompted intro is a hook other members reply to, pulling the newcomer into a thread on day one.
    - **Partner cross-post** — trade shout-outs with an adjacent community whose audience overlaps but does not compete.
    
    **90-9-1 is a range, not a ceiling.** The old "1% rule" (90% lurk, 9% occasional, 1% drive activity) is a *starting observation*, not a law — healthier communities skew far more active (real profiles like 55-30-15 and 17-57-26). Design to **move lurkers up a tier** (prompts, easy reactions, direct asks), do not accept 90% lurkers as fixed.
    
    ```text
    Bad:  Buy 2,000 members from a growth service to "look big."  → DAU/MAU craters,
           signal drowns in silence, real members read the room as dead and leave.
    Good: Run a referral ritual + prompted intros. 200 members who each reply
           in week one beats 2,000 who never speak.
    ```
    
    Bought or inactive members are **negative-value**: they dilute every signal, wreck DAU/MAU, and make the room *look* dead to the people you actually want.
    
    ## Metrics & health
    
    Three clusters plus exactly one business metric. Steer on these, not on raw member count.
    
    | Metric | What it tells you | Target |
    |---|---|---|
    | DAU/MAU stickiness | How often members come back | Floor ≥ 20%; social/messaging band ~50–80% |
    | 30/60/90-day cohort retention | Whether onboarding actually activates | Track each cohort vs the last |
    | Returning-member ratio | Rhythm is working | Trending up |
    | Time-to-first-response (TTFR) | A newcomer's first experience | Minutes-to-low-hours, the lower the better |
    | Answered rate | Questions don't die unanswered | → 100% |
    | **One business metric** (purpose-tied) | The only number that justifies the work | Set in Step 0 |
    
    The one business metric is a menu — **pick exactly one** that matches your purpose: support deflection, retention uplift, expansion revenue, or qualified referrals. Review the scorecard on a fixed cadence (weekly glance, monthly cohort read). Benchmark depth and metric definitions are in `references/metrics-and-rituals.md`.
    
    ## The artifact you emit
    
    Produce two files the user can apply directly: a `community-plan.md` (prose: purpose, platform rationale, structure, growth, metrics) and a machine-checkable `moderation-config.yaml`:
    
    ```yaml
    platform: discord            # discord | telegram | circle
    purpose: "where indie game-devs trade WIP feedback so free players become paying supporters"
    north_star_metric: "monthly free→supporter conversions sourced from the server"
    onboarding_path:
      - role-on-join
      - rules-gate
      - prompted-intro
      - where-to-ask
    moderation:
      layers:
        native: "AutoMod preset + custom keyword rules, Medium verification"
        bot: "specialized raid + scam-link bot"
        human: "2 named mods, written ban rubric"
    rituals:
      - name: "WIP Mondays"
        cadence: "weekly"
      - name: "Wins Fridays"
        cadence: "weekly"
    ```
    
    Then validate it:
    
    ```bash
    scripts/verify.sh path/to/moderation-config.yaml
    ```
    
    `verify.sh` checks the required keys exist, that `north_star_metric` is non-empty, that all three moderation layers are declared, and that at least one ritual has a cadence — it catches the most common defect (a "plan" with no purpose, no mod layers, or no rhythm). **Do not go live until it passes and the north-star plus at least one health metric (TTFR or DAU/MAU) are instrumented.**
    
    ## Anti-patterns
    
    | Anti-pattern | Why it fails | Do instead |
    |---|---|---|
    | Channel sprawl on day one | Empty channels read as "dead"; people leave | Start 4–6; split only on demonstrated overflow |
    | No purpose / no north-star | Nothing to design toward → graveyard | Run Step 0 gate before any structure |
    | `@everyone` for non-urgent posts | Trains members to mute → functionally gone | Opt-in announce role; reserve `@everyone` |
    | Buying members to "look big" | Negative-value: dilutes signal, wrecks DAU/MAU | Referral + intro loops; activate the real ones |
    | Ban-by-mood | Inconsistency destroys trust | Written warn→mute→kick→ban rubric |
    | Treating 90% lurkers as permanent | Leaves activation on the table | 90-9-1 is a range; move lurkers up a tier |
    | Monetizing on Circle before activation works | Charging for a dead room churns instantly | Prove rhythm + retention, then gate/monetize |
    | Broadcasting in a two-way space | Wrong tool; kills conversation | One-to-many → `../newsletter/SKILL.md` / `../social-publisher/SKILL.md` |
    

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation.

No comments yet.

Reviews (0)

No reviews yet.

Related