Claude
Skill
cold-email-writer
Write personalized cold emails that earn replies - research-based hooks, clear relevance, low-friction asks. Use for outbound prospecting messages.
Virus-scanned
Reviewed automatically before listing.
Download
navinspire-ia-navin-navin_skills_cold-email-writer-e9c73a3.zip · 1 KB
Install
skills CLI
npx skills add https://github.com/Navinspire-ia/navin/tree/main/navin/skills/cold-email-writer
Claude Code
claude plugin marketplace add https://llmmart.ai/marketplace.json && claude plugin install navinspire-ia-navin@llmmart
Git
git clone https://github.com/Navinspire-ia/navin.git
The skills CLI installs just this skill, for any of its supported agents. Claude Code installs the whole navinspire-ia/navin collection as a plugin from our marketplace. Git is the plain clone.
Skill manifest
Cold Email Writer
A cold email earns a reply when it proves relevance in the first line and asks for something easy. Personalization is research, not {{first_name}}.
When to use
- Outbound first-touch and sequence email copy
- LinkedIn note copy when asked (keep under platform limits)
When not to use
- Warm intros where a full proposal is needed
- Spam blasts / purchased lists
Anatomy (60-120 words)
- Subject - 2-5 words, specific - no clickbait
- Line 1 - observation that proves homework (news, job post, project)
- Bridge - observation → problem you solve (one sentence)
- Proof - one relevant result with a real number you can defend
- Ask - low friction question or 15-minute check - not a hard calendar CTA cold
Personalization tiers
| Tier | Effort | Use for |
|---|---|---|
| Researched | 10-15 min | A-leads |
| Segmented | template + 2 min | B-leads |
| Generic blast | never | - |
Workflow
- Input: lead +
account-research/buying-signalsfor A-leads. - Write 2 variants; cut to <120 words; check mobile (subject + first line).
- Plan sequence with
outreach-sequencer. - Human validation before send; track which hooks win.
Rules
- Never fake familiarity or fake urgency.
- One CTA. No attachments on first touch. No "je me permets".
- Do not invent case-study metrics; use real ones or omit proof.
- Compliance: identify yourself/company; honor opt-out.
Anti-patterns
- Long brochures
- "I help companies like yours" with no specificity
- Fake "saw you were looking at our site" intent lies
Files (navin)
-
SKILL.md 1.8 KB
--- name: cold-email-writer description: Write personalized cold emails that earn replies - research-based hooks, clear relevance, low-friction asks. Use for outbound prospecting messages. metadata: {"navin":{"emoji":"🧊","category":"sales"}} --- # Cold Email Writer A cold email earns a reply when it proves relevance in the first line and asks for something easy. Personalization is research, not {{first_name}}. ## When to use - Outbound first-touch and sequence email copy - LinkedIn note copy when asked (keep under platform limits) ## When not to use - Warm intros where a full proposal is needed - Spam blasts / purchased lists ## Anatomy (60-120 words) 1. **Subject** - 2-5 words, specific - no clickbait 2. **Line 1** - observation that proves homework (news, job post, project) 3. **Bridge** - observation → problem you solve (one sentence) 4. **Proof** - one relevant result with a real number you can defend 5. **Ask** - low friction question or 15-minute check - not a hard calendar CTA cold ## Personalization tiers | Tier | Effort | Use for | |------|--------|---------| | Researched | 10-15 min | A-leads | | Segmented | template + 2 min | B-leads | | Generic blast | never | - | ## Workflow 1. Input: lead + `account-research` / `buying-signals` for A-leads. 2. Write 2 variants; cut to <120 words; check mobile (subject + first line). 3. Plan sequence with `outreach-sequencer`. 4. Human validation before send; track which hooks win. ## Rules - Never fake familiarity or fake urgency. - One CTA. No attachments on first touch. No "je me permets". - Do not invent case-study metrics; use real ones or omit proof. - Compliance: identify yourself/company; honor opt-out. ## Anti-patterns - Long brochures - "I help companies like yours" with no specificity - Fake "saw you were looking at our site" intent lies
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation.
Reviews (0)
No reviews yet.
No comments yet.