Claude Skill

changelog-from-commits

Use when cutting a release, writing a CHANGELOG entry, or summarizing what changed since a tag — when the repo's commits follow (or mostly follow) Conventional Commits and a mechanically-accurate section breakdown beats a model's reading of the diff.

LLM Mart · 0 points · 8 views 29 listing impressions 0 install-command copies
Virus-scanned Reviewed automatically before listing.

Full trust report

Download rtur2003-claude-code-promts-skills-.claude_skills_changelog-from-commits-37c1edc.zip · 2 KB
Part of rtur2003/claude-code-promts-skills — 5 skills

Install

skills CLI npx skills add https://github.com/Rtur2003/Claude-Code-Promts-Skills/tree/main/.claude/skills/changelog-from-commits
Claude Code claude plugin marketplace add https://llmmart.ai/marketplace.json && claude plugin install rtur2003-claude-code-promts-skills@llmmart
Git git clone https://github.com/Rtur2003/Claude-Code-Promts-Skills.git

The skills CLI installs just this skill, for any of its supported agents. Claude Code installs the whole rtur2003/claude-code-promts-skills collection as a plugin from our marketplace. Git is the plain clone.

Skill manifest

Changelog From Commits

Overview

Parses git log against the Conventional Commits spec and prints a categorized changelog: Features, Fixes, Performance, Refactoring, Docs, Tests, Build, CI, Chore, Other, plus a BREAKING CHANGES section pulled from ! markers and BREAKING CHANGE: footers. Deterministic — the categorization is a fact about the commit message, not a judgment call, so a script produces it more reliably than a model re-reading commit subjects.

Core principle: A changelog section is either correct (matches the commit's own declared type) or it silently drops/miscategorizes a change. Parsing is not the place for approximation.

Usage

bash ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/generate.sh [from-ref] [to-ref]
  • from-ref defaults to the most recent tag, or the repo's root commit if there are no tags.
  • to-ref defaults to HEAD.
  • Requires a git repository; exits 2 if run outside one.
  • Prints Markdown to stdout — pipe into a file, or paste directly into CHANGELOG.md.
bash ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/generate.sh v1.2.0 HEAD > /tmp/new-entries.md
bash ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/generate.sh                    # since the last tag, to HEAD

What it gets right and what it doesn't

Reliable: type(scope)!: subject parsing, breaking-change detection (! or a BREAKING CHANGE: footer), section grouping, short-hash linking, merge commits excluded automatically.

Falls back to "Other": any commit whose subject doesn't start with a known Conventional Commits type (feat/fix/perf/refactor/docs/test/build/ci/chore) — including free-text subjects like "Initial plan" or "Add X". A repo that doesn't consistently use Conventional Commits will produce a large "Other" section; that's an honest signal about the commit history, not a script bug. See it happen: run this against this library's own pre-2.0 history and most entries land in Other because they predate the Conventional Commits convention adopted later.

Not attempted: rewriting or improving commit subjects, deduplicating near-identical entries, or inferring a type the author didn't declare.

After generating

The script produces raw categorized entries — it does not write prose framing, a version header, or a date. Add those yourself (or ask Claude to), and edit any "Other" entries that deserve reclassification before they ship in a release. Don't paste the raw output into CHANGELOG.md as the final section without a pass over "Other" and "BREAKING CHANGES" — those two sections are exactly where a human or model read adds real value on top of the deterministic parse.

Remember

Categorization is deterministic; the narrative framing around it (a version header, a "why" sentence, what to call out) is not. Do the first with the script, the second with judgment.

Files (claude-code-promts-skills)
  • scripts
    • generate.sh 2.7 KB
      #!/usr/bin/env bash
      # Deterministic changelog generation from Conventional Commits. Requires git.
      # Usage: generate.sh [from-ref] [to-ref]
      #   from-ref defaults to the most recent tag (or the repo root commit if no tags exist)
      #   to-ref defaults to HEAD
      set -euo pipefail
      
      if ! git rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree >/dev/null 2>&1; then
        echo "error: not a git repository" >&2
        exit 2
      fi
      
      FROM="${1:-}"
      TO="${2:-HEAD}"
      
      if [ -z "$FROM" ]; then
        FROM="$(git describe --tags --abbrev=0 2>/dev/null || git rev-list --max-parents=0 HEAD | tail -1)"
      fi
      
      RANGE="${FROM}..${TO}"
      
      # Tab-separated: hash, subject. Body is fetched separately per-commit for breaking-change detection.
      COMMITS="$(git log "$RANGE" --no-merges --pretty=format:'%H%x09%s' 2>/dev/null || true)"
      
      if [ -z "$COMMITS" ]; then
        echo "No commits in range $RANGE" >&2
        exit 0
      fi
      
      declare -A SECTIONS
      SECTIONS[feat]="### Features"
      SECTIONS[fix]="### Fixes"
      SECTIONS[perf]="### Performance"
      SECTIONS[refactor]="### Refactoring"
      SECTIONS[docs]="### Documentation"
      SECTIONS[test]="### Tests"
      SECTIONS[build]="### Build"
      SECTIONS[ci]="### CI"
      SECTIONS[chore]="### Chore"
      SECTIONS[other]="### Other"
      
      TMPDIR="$(mktemp -d)"
      trap 'rm -rf "$TMPDIR"' EXIT
      
      BREAKING_FILE="$TMPDIR/breaking.txt"
      : > "$BREAKING_FILE"
      
      while IFS=$'\t' read -r hash subject; do
        [ -z "$hash" ] && continue
      
        body="$(git log -1 --pretty=format:'%b' "$hash" 2>/dev/null || true)"
      
        # Conventional Commits: type(scope)!: subject  — the ! marks a breaking change,
        # as does a "BREAKING CHANGE:" footer in the body.
        if printf '%s' "$subject" | grep -Eq '^[a-z]+(\([^)]+\))?!:' || printf '%s' "$body" | grep -q '^BREAKING CHANGE:'; then
          printf '- %s (%s)\n' "$subject" "${hash:0:7}" >> "$BREAKING_FILE"
        fi
      
        type="$(printf '%s' "$subject" | sed -nE 's/^([a-z]+)(\([^)]+\))?!?:.*/\1/p')"
        scope="$(printf '%s' "$subject" | sed -nE 's/^[a-z]+\(([^)]+)\)!?:.*/\1/p')"
        desc="$(printf '%s' "$subject" | sed -E 's/^[a-z]+(\([^)]+\))?!?:[[:space:]]*//')"
      
        if [ -z "$type" ] || [ -z "${SECTIONS[$type]:-}" ]; then
          type="other"
          desc="$subject"
        fi
      
        if [ -n "$scope" ]; then
          printf '%s\t- **%s:** %s (%s)\n' "$type" "$scope" "$desc" "${hash:0:7}" >> "$TMPDIR/entries.tsv"
        else
          printf '%s\t- %s (%s)\n' "$type" "$desc" "${hash:0:7}" >> "$TMPDIR/entries.tsv"
        fi
      done <<< "$COMMITS"
      
      if [ -s "$BREAKING_FILE" ]; then
        echo "## BREAKING CHANGES"
        echo
        cat "$BREAKING_FILE"
        echo
      fi
      
      for type in feat fix perf refactor docs test build ci chore other; do
        if [ -f "$TMPDIR/entries.tsv" ] && grep -q "^${type}	" "$TMPDIR/entries.tsv"; then
          echo "${SECTIONS[$type]}"
          echo
          grep "^${type}	" "$TMPDIR/entries.tsv" | cut -f2-
          echo
        fi
      done
      
  • SKILL.md 3.1 KB
    ---
    name: changelog-from-commits
    description: Use when cutting a release, writing a CHANGELOG entry, or summarizing what changed since a tag — when the repo's commits follow (or mostly follow) Conventional Commits and a mechanically-accurate section breakdown beats a model's reading of the diff.
    ---
    
    # Changelog From Commits
    
    ## Overview
    
    Parses `git log` against the [Conventional Commits](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/) spec and prints a categorized changelog: Features, Fixes, Performance, Refactoring, Docs, Tests, Build, CI, Chore, Other, plus a BREAKING CHANGES section pulled from `!` markers and `BREAKING CHANGE:` footers. Deterministic — the categorization is a fact about the commit message, not a judgment call, so a script produces it more reliably than a model re-reading commit subjects.
    
    **Core principle:** A changelog section is either correct (matches the commit's own declared type) or it silently drops/miscategorizes a change. Parsing is not the place for approximation.
    
    ## Usage
    
    ```bash
    bash ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/generate.sh [from-ref] [to-ref]
    ```
    
    - `from-ref` defaults to the most recent tag, or the repo's root commit if there are no tags.
    - `to-ref` defaults to `HEAD`.
    - Requires a git repository; exits 2 if run outside one.
    - Prints Markdown to stdout — pipe into a file, or paste directly into `CHANGELOG.md`.
    
    ```bash
    bash ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/generate.sh v1.2.0 HEAD > /tmp/new-entries.md
    bash ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/generate.sh                    # since the last tag, to HEAD
    ```
    
    ## What it gets right and what it doesn't
    
    **Reliable:** `type(scope)!: subject` parsing, breaking-change detection (`!` or a `BREAKING CHANGE:` footer), section grouping, short-hash linking, merge commits excluded automatically.
    
    **Falls back to "Other":** any commit whose subject doesn't start with a known Conventional Commits type (`feat`/`fix`/`perf`/`refactor`/`docs`/`test`/`build`/`ci`/`chore`) — including free-text subjects like "Initial plan" or "Add X". A repo that doesn't consistently use Conventional Commits will produce a large "Other" section; that's an honest signal about the commit history, not a script bug. See it happen: run this against this library's own pre-2.0 history and most entries land in Other because they predate the Conventional Commits convention adopted later.
    
    **Not attempted:** rewriting or improving commit subjects, deduplicating near-identical entries, or inferring a type the author didn't declare.
    
    ## After generating
    
    The script produces raw categorized entries — it does not write prose framing, a version header, or a date. Add those yourself (or ask Claude to), and edit any "Other" entries that deserve reclassification before they ship in a release. Don't paste the raw output into `CHANGELOG.md` as the final section without a pass over "Other" and "BREAKING CHANGES" — those two sections are exactly where a human or model read adds real value on top of the deterministic parse.
    
    ## Remember
    
    > Categorization is deterministic; the narrative framing around it (a version header, a "why" sentence, what to call out) is not. Do the first with the script, the second with judgment.
    

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation.

No comments yet.

Reviews (0)

No reviews yet.

Related