auth-md
Generate, validate, and explain `auth.md` files — the open protocol for AI agent registration. Use when making apps agent-ready, generating Protected Resource Metadata (RFC 9728), validating auth.md files, or implementing agent registration endpoints. Triggers on "auth.md", "agen
Install
npx skills add https://github.com/fabricioctelles/skills/tree/main/skills/auth-md
claude plugin marketplace add https://llmmart.ai/marketplace.json && claude plugin install fabricioctelles-skills@llmmart
git clone https://github.com/fabricioctelles/skills.git
The skills CLI installs just this skill, for any of its supported agents. Claude Code installs the whole fabricioctelles/skills collection as a plugin from our marketplace. Git is the plain clone.
Skill manifest
auth-md
Generate, validate, and explain the auth.md protocol — the open standard that lets AI agents register for services on behalf of users, without signup forms.
Protocol Context
auth.md is a Markdown file published at a service's root (typically https://service.com/auth.md) that instructs agents on how to register. It works simultaneously as human-readable documentation and as a discoverable runtime artifact for agents.
The protocol extends RFC 9728 (OAuth 2.0 Protected Resource Metadata) with an agent_auth block in the Authorization Server metadata. Registration returns an identity_assertion (service-signed JWT) that the agent exchanges at /oauth2/token for an access_token. Three registration methods are supported:
| Flow | Mechanism | When to use |
|---|---|---|
| identity_assertion | Provider signs an ID-JAG (with auth_time) asserting user identity. Service verifies JWKS, returns identity_assertion. Agent exchanges at /oauth2/token. |
Service does JIT provisioning from OIDC/SAML; wants zero-friction registration. |
| service_auth | Email hint + browser-based ceremony. Agent receives user_code + verification_uri; user signs in and types code. Agent polls /oauth2/token. |
Agents on platforms that can't mint ID-JAGs; self-serve without trust list. |
| anonymous | No identity upfront. Immediate identity_assertion with pre-claim scopes. Optional deferred claim for scope upgrade. |
Agent needs basic access immediately; human ownership binding deferred. |
Protocol Endpoints
| Endpoint | Purpose |
|---|---|
/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource |
Discovery — resource metadata (RFC 9728) |
/.well-known/oauth-authorization-server |
Discovery — AS metadata with agent_auth block |
POST /agent/identity |
Registration — dispatches on type field |
POST /agent/identity/claim |
Claim initiation (anonymous deferred, or re-initiate expired user_code) |
POST /oauth2/token |
Token exchange (JWT-bearer grant) + claim polling (claim grant) |
POST /oauth2/revoke |
Credential-layer revocation (RFC 7009) |
events_endpoint |
Registration-layer revocation (receives SETs, RFC 8935) |
Token Lifecycle
Registration never returns an access_token directly. The flow is:
- Registration →
identity_assertion(service-signed JWT, reusable until expiry) - Exchange →
POST /oauth2/tokenwithgrant_type=urn:ietf:params:oauth:grant-type:jwt-bearer→access_token - Refresh → re-exchange same
identity_assertionwhen access_token expires - Expired assertion → restart at registration (Step 3)
Claim Ceremony (v2 — Browser-Based)
The claim ceremony uses RFC 8628-style device authorization:
- Registration returns
user_code+verification_uriin aclaimblock - Agent surfaces both to the user
- User opens
verification_uri, signs in to the service, types the 6-digit code - Agent polls
POST /oauth2/tokenwithgrant_type=urn:workos:agent-auth:grant-type:claim+claim_token - On success: receives
access_token+ freshidentity_assertion
Operation Modes
| Parameter | Default | Description |
|---|---|---|
mode |
generate |
generate = create auth.md + metadata; validate = check existing auth.md; explain = explain the protocol |
validation_level |
basic |
basic = structure + fields + consistency (offline); full = basic + live endpoint fetch |
flows |
all |
Which flows to include: identity_assertion, service_auth, anonymous, all |
role |
app |
Perspective: app = service accepting registrations; provider = platform minting ID-JAGs |
Workflow: Generate
1. Scan the codebase
Look for:
- Existing API routes and authentication patterns
- Defined scopes/permissions
- Framework (Express, Django, Rails, FastAPI, NestJS, etc.)
- Base URL and auth server URL configuration
- Existing authentication middleware
- User models and provisioning mechanisms
2. Ask the user only what cannot be inferred
- Which flows to support (identity_assertion, service_auth, anonymous, or combination)
- Pre-claim scopes vs post-claim scopes (if anonymous)
- Trusted agent providers and trust list policy (if identity_assertion)
- Whether the service already does JIT provisioning or requires manual onboarding
idJagMaxAuthAgeSecondsvalue (default: 3600)- Desired rate limiting policy
3. Generate artifacts
Produce three artifacts:
a) auth.md — Markdown file following the protocol template (see references/protocol-template.md). Must contain:
- Title and intro addressed to the agent
- Step 1 — Discover (two hops: PRM → AS metadata)
- Step 2 — Pick a method (decision tree)
- Step 3 — Register (one subsection per supported method)
- Step 4 — Claim ceremony (if service_auth or anonymous with claim)
- Step 5 — Exchange the assertion (POST /oauth2/token with jwt-bearer grant)
- Step 6 — Use the access_token
- Errors (complete table with all applicable codes)
- Revocation (two layers)
b) oauth-protected-resource.json — JSON for /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource with resource_name and resource_logo_uri
c) oauth-authorization-server.json — JSON for /.well-known/oauth-authorization-server with:
issuer,token_endpoint,revocation_endpoint,grant_types_supported- Complete
agent_authblock withidentity_endpoint,claim_endpoint,events_endpoint
4. Generate implementation guidance
"Next Steps" section with:
- How to serve
auth.mdat the domain root - How to serve metadata at the well-known paths
- How to add
WWW-Authenticateheader to 401 responses - Endpoint implementation guidance (without generating framework-specific code unless requested)
- Token exchange implementation at
/oauth2/token - Claim page hosting (verification_uri → login → code input → confirm)
- Recommended rate limiting configuration
- Recommended audit events
- Security considerations (token hashing, auth_time validation, replay protection, claim_token handling)
5. Generate Agent Provider guide (if role=provider)
When the user is an agent provider (not an app), generate:
- How to mint audience-specific ID-JAGs with
auth_time - Token structure (header + payload with required and optional claims)
- How to publish JWKS
- Optionally: how to publish a CIMD (Client ID Metadata Document)
- How to implement revocation (POST SET to events_endpoint)
- How to present consent to the user before asserting identity (using
resource_name+resource_logo_uri)
Workflow: Validate
1. Load the auth.md
From a local file path or URL.
2. Run validation at the requested level
Basic (offline):
- All required headings present (Step 1–6, Errors, Revocation)
- At least one flow documented
- Valid JSON in fenced code blocks for request/response shapes
- AS metadata contains
identity_endpoint,token_endpoint,grant_types_supported - Error table with standard error codes
- Consistency: flows in prose match
identity_types_supportedin metadata JSON - No unreplaced placeholders
Full (live):
- All basic checks, plus:
- Fetch
/.well-known/oauth-protected-resourcefrom the declared base URL - Verify
agent_authblock exists in AS metadata - Fetch
/.well-known/oauth-authorization-serverand verify consistency - Check that
identity_endpoint,token_endpoint,revocation_endpointrespond (accept 400/401/422, reject 404/405) - Verify API returns 401 with
WWW-Authenticatecontainingresource_metadata
3. Report results
Checklist with ✅/❌ per rule, grouped by category:
- Structure — headings and order
- Fields — required fields in JSONs
- Consistency — cross-references between prose and metadata
- Format — valid JSON, valid HTTP, no placeholders
- Endpoints (full only) — reachability and correct responses
Include severity: 🔴 Error (agents will fail), 🟡 Warning (degraded experience), 🟢 Info (suggestion).
See references/validation-rules.md for the complete ruleset.
Workflow: Explain
When the user wants to understand the protocol without generating or validating:
- Identify what the user wants to know (overview, specific flow, specific endpoint, security, etc.)
- Explain using the protocol context above and the references
- Use text-based sequence diagrams when helpful
- Point to official documentation when relevant
User Matching and JIT Provisioning
The identity_assertion flow needs to decide which service user a registration represents. Recommended resolution order:
- Delegation record match — if
(iss, sub)has a delegation on file, route to same user - Verified email match — if a user exists with same verified email BUT no
(iss, sub)delegation →interaction_required(401) with claim block for user to confirm linking - Verified phone match — same pattern
- No match → JIT — create a new user per provisioning policy, or refuse
Reject ID-JAGs with neither a verified email nor a verified phone — there's no basis for matching.
Rate Limiting
The /agent/identity endpoint is unauthenticated for anonymous registration. Implement two tiers:
- Per-IP (checked first) — prevents a single source from consuming the tenant's budget. Default: 5/hour anonymous, 60/hour identity_assertion.
- Per-tenant (checked second) — global cap across IPs. Default: 100/hour anonymous, 1000/hour identity_assertion.
Also rate-limit /oauth2/token polling — enforce interval from the claim block, reject with slow_down if too fast.
Recommended Audit Events
| Event | When | Data |
|---|---|---|
registration.created |
Successful POST /agent/identity | registration_id, registration_type, iss, sub |
registration.interaction_required |
401 interaction_required | registration_id, iss, sub, matched_user_id |
registration.login_required |
401 login_required | iss, sub, auth_time, max_age |
claim.initiated |
/agent/identity/claim called | registration_id, email |
claim.completed |
User submitted correct user_code | registration_id, claimed_by_user_id |
claim.expired |
user_code window or registration expired | registration_id |
token.exchanged |
/oauth2/token jwt-bearer success | registration_id, access_token_id |
token.revoked |
/oauth2/revoke called | access_token_id |
registration.revoked |
SET processed at events_endpoint | registration_id, iss, sub |
Security Considerations
- auth_time validation —
auth_timeis required in ID-JAGs. Service validates againstidJagMaxAuthAgeSeconds. If too old, returnslogin_required(401) — agent must get user to re-authenticate at provider. - claim_token handling — returned exactly once in the registration response. Agent holds in memory only for ceremony duration. Do not persist past Step 4.
- Token hashing —
claim_tokenis a bearer secret. Store only SHA-256 hash server-side. - Consent UX — surface
resource_nameandresource_logo_urifrom PRM to the user before asserting identity. This is the user's only consent gate. - Two revocation layers — credential layer (agent-callable,
/oauth2/revoke, kills one access_token) vs registration layer (provider-driven SETs atevents_endpoint, kills identity_assertion + all derived tokens). - Replay protection — cache
jtivalues with TTL of at leastexp - iat+ clock skew (typically 6 min). - CIMD resolution — if
client_idis a URL, fetch as Client ID Metadata Document and verifyjwks_uri. - Bulk revocation — provide operator-facing mechanism to revoke all outstanding identity_assertions for a tenant.
Error Codes Reference
| Code | Where | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
anonymous_not_enabled |
/agent/identity |
Service doesn't accept anonymous |
service_auth_not_enabled |
/agent/identity |
service_auth disabled |
issuer_not_enabled |
/agent/identity |
Provider not on trust list |
invalid_request |
/agent/identity |
Body/claim/signature/jti/aud problems |
interaction_required (401) |
/agent/identity |
ID-JAG matched account, no delegation — claim needed |
login_required (401) |
/agent/identity |
auth_time too old — re-authenticate at provider |
invalid_claim_token |
/agent/identity/claim |
Token wrong or expired |
claimed_or_in_flight |
/agent/identity/claim |
Already claimed or wrong endpoint |
claim_expired |
/agent/identity/claim |
Registration expired |
invalid_grant |
/oauth2/token |
Assertion expired/revoked |
invalid_client |
/oauth2/token |
client_id not recognized |
unsupported_grant_type |
/oauth2/token |
Not jwt-bearer or claim grant |
authorization_pending |
/oauth2/token (claim) |
User hasn't completed ceremony |
expired_token |
/oauth2/token (claim) |
user_code window closed |
slow_down |
/oauth2/token (claim) |
Polling too fast |
rate_limited (429) |
any | Back off and retry |
Agent Readiness Scanner Check
The isitagentready.com scanner validates auth.md as the authMd check. Pass criteria:
/auth.mdserved from site root with HTTP 200- Content is Markdown with H1 heading containing "auth.md"
- Optionally validates OAuth Protected Resource Metadata at
/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource - Optionally validates Authorization Server metadata at
/.well-known/oauth-authorization-server
To pass the check minimally:
# auth.md
This service accepts AI agent registrations.
## Authentication
Agents can register via POST /agent/identity with a valid ID-JAG.
See below for supported methods.
To pass with full marks (all metadata):
- Serve
/auth.mdwith proper heading - Publish
/.well-known/oauth-protected-resourcewithresource,resource_name,resource_logo_uri,authorization_servers,scopes_supported,bearer_methods_supported: ["header"] - Publish
/.well-known/oauth-authorization-serverwithissuer,token_endpoint,revocation_endpoint,grant_types_supported, andagent_authblock containingskill,identity_endpoint,claim_endpoint,events_endpoint, and registration methods
Scan command:
curl -s -X POST 'https://isitagentready.com/api/scan' \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d '{"url":"https://YOUR-DOMAIN/","enabledChecks":["authMd"]}' | jq '.checks.discovery.authMd'
Quality Checklist
Before delivering output, verify:
- Generated
auth.mdcontains all required steps (1-6) + Errors + Revocation - AS metadata includes
issuer,token_endpoint,revocation_endpoint,grant_types_supported -
agent_authblock includesidentity_endpoint,claim_endpoint,events_endpoint -
identity_types_supportedmatches the flows the user chose -
scopes_supportedreflects actual API scopes found in codebase - Base URLs are consistent between auth.md and metadata JSON
- Error codes table includes all standard codes for the supported flows
- Step 5 documents token exchange at
/oauth2/tokenwith jwt-bearer grant - Revocation section documents both layers (credential + registration)
- No unreplaced placeholder values (
{{...}},<your-...>,[YOUR_...]) - Validation report covers all rules for the requested level
- Rate limiting documented (including /oauth2/token polling)
- Security considerations included (auth_time, claim_token, consent UX)
- If role=provider: ID-JAG structure with
auth_timedocumented
References
references/protocol-template.md— Complete auth.md template with all sections and placeholdersreferences/validation-rules.md— Full validation ruleset with error messages and severitiesreferences/metadata-schema.md— JSON schema for PRM, AS metadata, ID-JAG, and identity_assertionreferences/example-auth-md.md— Working example of a complete auth.md file (Acme Notes)references/implementation-guide.md— Server-side implementation guide with token exchange, claim ceremony, revocation, and security
Updating Protocol Knowledge
This skill ships with a snapshot of the auth.md protocol specification (v2, June 2026). When possible, fetch the latest version from:
- Skill Home and Doc Hub:
https://auth-md.com - Spec:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/workos/auth.md/refs/heads/main/AUTH.md - Docs overview:
https://workos.com/auth-md/docs - Apps guide:
https://workos.com/auth-md/docs/apps - Agent providers guide:
https://workos.com/auth-md/docs/agent-providers - File anatomy:
https://workos.com/auth-md/docs/auth-md
If fetch fails, use the bundled references/ as the source of truth.
Files (skills)
-
references
-
example-auth-md.md 12.3 KB
# Complete Example: auth.md A working example of an `auth.md` file for the fictional "Acme Notes" service, updated to protocol v2 (June 2026). --- ## Example Context - **Service:** Acme Notes (collaborative notes app) - **Resource Server:** `https://api.acmenotes.com` - **Auth Server:** `https://auth.acmenotes.com` - **Supported flows:** identity_assertion (ID-JAG), service_auth, anonymous - **Scopes:** `notes.read`, `notes.write`, `notes.admin` --- ## The File ```markdown # auth.md You are an agent. This service supports **agentic registration**: discover → register → (claim if needed) → exchange for an access_token → call API → handle revocation. Follow the steps in order; do not skip ahead. The resource server is `https://api.acmenotes.com` and the authorization server is `https://auth.acmenotes.com`. ## Step 1 — Discover Discovery is two hops. The 401 response that pointed you here carries a `WWW-Authenticate` header with the PRM URL: \```http HTTP/1.1 401 Unauthorized WWW-Authenticate: Bearer resource_metadata="https://api.acmenotes.com/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource" \``` ### 1a. Fetch the Protected Resource Metadata \```http GET /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource \``` Response: \```json { "resource": "https://api.acmenotes.com/", "resource_name": "Acme Notes", "resource_logo_uri": "https://acmenotes.com/logo.png", "authorization_servers": ["https://auth.acmenotes.com/"], "scopes_supported": ["notes.read", "notes.write", "notes.admin"], "bearer_methods_supported": ["header"] } \``` ### 1b. Fetch the Authorization Server metadata \```http GET /.well-known/oauth-authorization-server \``` Response: \```json { "resource": "https://api.acmenotes.com/", "authorization_servers": ["https://auth.acmenotes.com/"], "scopes_supported": ["notes.read", "notes.write", "notes.admin"], "bearer_methods_supported": ["header"], "issuer": "https://auth.acmenotes.com", "token_endpoint": "https://auth.acmenotes.com/oauth2/token", "revocation_endpoint": "https://auth.acmenotes.com/oauth2/revoke", "grant_types_supported": [ "urn:ietf:params:oauth:grant-type:jwt-bearer", "urn:workos:agent-auth:grant-type:claim" ], "agent_auth": { "skill": "https://acmenotes.com/auth.md", "identity_endpoint": "https://auth.acmenotes.com/agent/identity", "claim_endpoint": "https://auth.acmenotes.com/agent/identity/claim", "events_endpoint": "https://auth.acmenotes.com/agent/event/notify", "identity_types_supported": ["anonymous", "identity_assertion", "service_auth"], "identity_assertion": { "assertion_types_supported": [ "urn:ietf:params:oauth:token-type:id-jag" ] }, "events_supported": [ "https://schemas.workos.com/events/agent/auth/identity/assertion/revoked" ] } } \``` ## Step 2 — Pick a method 1. **You have a session tied to a user identity and can exchange it for an ID-JAG** → identity_assertion + id-jag. 2. **You have only the user's email** → service_auth. Claim ceremony required. 3. **You have neither** → anonymous. Claim ceremony optional. Cross-check against the `agent_auth` block before proceeding. ## Step 3 — Register Before sending an `identity_assertion` or `service_auth` body, surface "Acme Notes" and its logo to the user and confirm consent. Skip for `anonymous`. ### identity_assertion + id-jag Mint the ID-JAG with: - `aud` = `https://api.acmenotes.com/` (from PRM `resource`) - `auth_time` = epoch seconds of user's last authentication at your provider (**required**) \```http POST /agent/identity Host: auth.acmenotes.com Content-Type: application/json { "type": "identity_assertion", "assertion_type": "urn:ietf:params:oauth:token-type:id-jag", "assertion": "<ID-JAG>" } \``` Response — no confirmation needed (200): \```json { "registration_id": "reg_01ABC123DEF456", "registration_type": "identity_assertion", "identity_assertion": "eyJhbGciOiJFUzI1NiJ9...", "assertion_expires": "2026-05-22T14:00:00.000Z", "scopes": ["notes.read", "notes.write"] } \``` Keep `identity_assertion` and go to Step 5. Response — confirmation required (401, `interaction_required`): \```json { "error": "interaction_required", "error_description": "ID-JAG email matches an existing account but no delegation on file for (iss, sub).", "registration_id": "reg_01ABC123DEF456", "registration_type": "identity_assertion", "claim_url": "https://auth.acmenotes.com/agent/identity/claim", "claim_token": "clm_xYz789AbC012dEf", "claim_token_expires": "2026-05-22T13:30:00.000Z", "post_claim_scopes": ["notes.read", "notes.write"], "claim": { "user_code": "847291", "expires_in": 600, "verification_uri": "https://auth.acmenotes.com/login?return_to=%2Fclaim%3Fclaim_attempt_token%3Dcat_abc123", "interval": 5 } } \``` Surface `verification_uri` + `user_code` to the user (Step 4b) and poll (Step 4c). Response — login required (401, `login_required`): \```json { "error": "login_required", "error_description": "auth_time is 7200s old; max allowed is 3600s. Re-authenticate at the provider.", "max_age": 3600 } \``` Re-authenticate the user at your provider and mint a fresh ID-JAG. ### service_auth \```http POST /agent/identity Host: auth.acmenotes.com Content-Type: application/json { "type": "service_auth", "login_hint": "jane@example.com" } \``` Response (200): \```json { "registration_id": "reg_01DEF789GHI012", "registration_type": "service_auth", "claim_url": "https://auth.acmenotes.com/agent/identity/claim", "claim_token": "clm_aBc123DeF456gHi", "claim_token_expires": "2026-05-22T13:30:00.000Z", "post_claim_scopes": ["notes.read", "notes.write"], "claim": { "user_code": "592841", "expires_in": 600, "verification_uri": "https://auth.acmenotes.com/login?return_to=%2Fclaim%3Fclaim_attempt_token%3Dcat_def456", "interval": 5 } } \``` No `identity_assertion` yet. Go to Step 4. ### anonymous \```http POST /agent/identity Host: auth.acmenotes.com Content-Type: application/json { "type": "anonymous" } \``` Response (200): \```json { "registration_id": "reg_01GHI345JKL678", "registration_type": "anonymous", "identity_assertion": "eyJhbGciOiJFUzI1NiJ9...", "assertion_expires": "2026-05-22T14:00:00.000Z", "pre_claim_scopes": ["notes.read"], "claim_url": "https://auth.acmenotes.com/agent/identity/claim", "claim_token": "clm_mNo345PqR678sTu", "claim_token_expires": "2026-05-22T13:30:00.000Z", "post_claim_scopes": ["notes.read", "notes.write"] } \``` Exchange `identity_assertion` at `/oauth2/token` for an access_token with `pre_claim_scopes` (Step 5). To upgrade scopes, go to Step 4. ## Step 4 — Claim ceremony ### 4a. Get the ceremony materials For **service_auth** and **interaction_required** responses, you already have the `claim` block. Skip to 4b. For **anonymous**, initiate: \```http POST /agent/identity/claim Host: auth.acmenotes.com Content-Type: application/json { "claim_token": "clm_mNo345PqR678sTu", "email": "jane@example.com" } \``` Response (200): \```json { "registration_id": "reg_01GHI345JKL678", "claim_attempt_id": "cla_001", "status": "initiated", "expires_at": "2026-05-22T13:40:00.000Z", "claim_attempt": { "user_code": "374918", "expires_in": 600, "verification_uri": "https://auth.acmenotes.com/login?return_to=%2Fclaim%3Fclaim_attempt_token%3Dcat_ghi789", "interval": 5 } } \``` ### 4b. Hand off to the user Surface to the user: > Open this link, sign in (or sign up), and enter this 6-digit code: **374918** > https://auth.acmenotes.com/login?return_to=%2Fclaim%3Fclaim_attempt_token%3Dcat_ghi789 The user signs in to Acme Notes, sees a confirmation page, and types the code. ### 4c. Poll for completion \```http POST /oauth2/token Host: auth.acmenotes.com Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded grant_type=urn:workos:agent-auth:grant-type:claim&claim_token=clm_mNo345PqR678sTu \``` Response while waiting: \```json { "error": "authorization_pending", "error_description": "User has not completed the claim ceremony yet." } \``` Response on success: \```json { "access_token": "eyJhbGciOiJSUzI1NiJ9...", "token_type": "Bearer", "expires_in": 3600, "scope": "notes.read notes.write", "identity_assertion": "eyJhbGciOiJFUzI1NiJ9...", "assertion_expires": "2026-05-22T15:00:00.000Z" } \``` Use `access_token` immediately. Cache `identity_assertion` for refresh via Step 5. If `user_code` window expires: \```json { "error": "expired_token", "error_description": "The user_code window has closed." } \``` Re-call `POST /agent/identity/claim` with same `claim_token` and `email` for a fresh code. If that returns `claim_expired`, restart at Step 3. ## Step 5 — Exchange the assertion \```http POST /oauth2/token Host: auth.acmenotes.com Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded grant_type=urn:ietf:params:oauth:grant-type:jwt-bearer&assertion=eyJhbGciOiJFUzI1NiJ9...&resource=https://api.acmenotes.com/ \``` Response (200): \```json { "access_token": "eyJhbGciOiJSUzI1NiJ9...", "token_type": "Bearer", "expires_in": 3600, "scope": "notes.read notes.write" } \``` Same `identity_assertion` can be re-used until it expires. If `invalid_grant`, restart at Step 3. ## Step 6 — Use the access_token \```http GET /api/notes Host: api.acmenotes.com Authorization: Bearer eyJhbGciOiJSUzI1NiJ9... \``` **Refresh:** When access_token expires, re-call Step 5 with same identity_assertion. When identity_assertion expires or Step 5 returns `invalid_grant`, restart at Step 3. On 401 for a previously-working access_token: try Step 5 once. If that also fails, restart at Step 1. Full API docs: https://docs.acmenotes.com/ ## Errors | Code | Where | What to do | |------|-------|------------| | `anonymous_not_enabled` | `/agent/identity` | Pick another method from Step 2 | | `service_auth_not_enabled` | `/agent/identity` | Pick another method | | `issuer_not_enabled` | `/agent/identity` | Provider not on trust list. Pick another method | | `invalid_request` | `/agent/identity` | Fix body shape, ID-JAG signature/jti/aud problems | | `interaction_required` (401) | `/agent/identity` (ID-JAG) | Body carries `claim` block; surface to user (Step 4) | | `login_required` (401) | `/agent/identity` (ID-JAG) | Re-authenticate user at provider, mint fresh ID-JAG | | `invalid_claim_token` | `/agent/identity/claim` | Restart at Step 3 | | `claimed_or_in_flight` | `/agent/identity/claim` | Already claimed | | `claim_expired` | `/agent/identity/claim` | Restart at Step 3 | | `invalid_grant` | `/oauth2/token` | Assertion expired/revoked. Restart at Step 3 | | `unsupported_grant_type` | `/oauth2/token` | Use one of the two supported grants | | `authorization_pending` | `/oauth2/token` (claim) | User hasn't finished. Honor `interval` | | `expired_token` | `/oauth2/token` (claim) | user_code window closed. Re-initiate or restart | | `slow_down` | `/oauth2/token` (claim) | Add ≥5s to interval | | `rate_limited` (429) | any | Back off and retry | ## Revocation Two independent layers: - **Credential layer (RFC 7009):** POST `token=<access_token>&token_type_hint=access_token` to `https://auth.acmenotes.com/oauth2/revoke`. Kills one access_token. Identity assertion intact — re-run Step 5. - **Registration layer (RFC 8935):** Provider POSTs a Security Event Token to `events_endpoint`. Invalidates identity_assertion and all derived access_tokens. Agent discovers via `invalid_grant` at `/oauth2/token` — restart at Step 3. On 401 for a previously-working access_token: try Step 5 once. If `/oauth2/token` succeeds, credential-layer revocation. If `invalid_grant`, registration-layer — restart at Step 3. ``` --- ## Notes on This Example 1. **All three flows** documented — in production, delete sections for unsupported flows 2. **Token exchange step** (Step 5) — registration never returns access_token directly; always returns identity_assertion 3. **Browser-based claim ceremony** — user_code + verification_uri replaces OTP-via-email 4. **`interaction_required` response** — shows the 401 path when ID-JAG email matches existing account without delegation 5. **`login_required` response** — shows `auth_time` freshness enforcement 6. **Two revocation layers** — credential (agent-callable) vs registration (provider-driven) 7. **Claim polling at `/oauth2/token`** — uses profile-specific grant URN to avoid collision with standard RFC 8628 -
implementation-guide.md 16.7 KB
# Server-Side Implementation Guide Detailed guidance for implementing auth.md protocol endpoints on the backend (v2, June 2026). Covers discovery, registration, claim ceremony, token exchange, revocation, security, rate limiting, and audit events. --- ## Table of Contents 1. [Minimum Implementation](#minimum-implementation) 2. [Discovery Documents](#discovery-documents) 3. [POST /agent/identity — Registration Handler](#post-agentidentity--registration-handler) 4. [ID-JAG Verification](#id-jag-verification) 5. [Claim Ceremony](#claim-ceremony) 6. [POST /oauth2/token — Token Endpoint](#post-oauth2token--token-endpoint) 7. [Revocation](#revocation) 8. [User Matching and JIT Provisioning](#user-matching-and-jit-provisioning) 9. [Rate Limiting](#rate-limiting) 10. [Security](#security) 11. [Audit Events](#audit-events) 12. [Deploy Checklist](#deploy-checklist) --- ## Minimum Implementation 1. Publish `/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource` with `resource_name` and `resource_logo_uri` 2. Publish `/.well-known/oauth-authorization-server` with `issuer`, `token_endpoint`, `revocation_endpoint`, `grant_types_supported`, and `agent_auth` block 3. Return `WWW-Authenticate: Bearer resource_metadata="..."` on 401 responses 4. Host `POST /agent/identity` that dispatches on the `type` field 5. For identity_assertion: maintain a trust list and verify ID-JAG signatures via JWKS, validate `auth_time` 6. For service_auth: return `claim` block with `user_code` + `verification_uri` 7. For anonymous: issue `identity_assertion` immediately with pre-claim scopes 8. Host `POST /agent/identity/claim` for deferred claim initiation 9. Implement `POST /oauth2/token` handling both grant types (jwt-bearer exchange + claim polling) 10. Implement `POST /oauth2/revoke` for credential-layer revocation (RFC 7009) 11. Accept SETs at `events_endpoint` for registration-layer revocation (RFC 8935) 12. Record audit events for every state change --- ## Discovery Documents ### Serving the PRM ``` GET /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource → 200 OK → Content-Type: application/json ``` Must include `resource_name` and `resource_logo_uri` — agents surface these to the user for consent before asserting identity. Cache aggressively: `Cache-Control: public, max-age=3600`. ### Serving the AS Metadata ``` GET /.well-known/oauth-authorization-server → 200 OK → Content-Type: application/json ``` Must include standard OAuth fields (`issuer`, `token_endpoint`, `revocation_endpoint`, `grant_types_supported`) plus the `agent_auth` block with `identity_endpoint`, `claim_endpoint`, `events_endpoint`. ### WWW-Authenticate Header On every 401 response from the API: ```http HTTP/1.1 401 Unauthorized WWW-Authenticate: Bearer resource_metadata="https://api.service.com/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource" ``` --- ## POST /agent/identity — Registration Handler All registration requests share the same endpoint and dispatch on the `type` field: ``` POST /agent/identity Content-Type: application/json ``` ### Dispatch | `type` | Flow | Returns | |--------|------|---------| | `identity_assertion` | ID-JAG verified | `identity_assertion` (service-signed JWT) | | `service_auth` | Email hint + browser ceremony | `claim` block (ceremony materials) | | `anonymous` | No identity | `identity_assertion` + `claim_token` for deferred claim | ### Handler: identity_assertion + id-jag 1. Decode the ID-JAG header to obtain `kid` and `alg` 2. Look up the issuer (`iss`) in the trust list. Reject if unknown → `issuer_not_enabled` 3. Fetch JWKS from the provider (see ID-JAG Verification section for caching) 4. Verify signature → `invalid_request` if fails 5. Validate claims: - `aud` matches the `resource` from PRM → `invalid_request` - `exp` is in the future → `invalid_request` - `iat` not unreasonably in the future (~1-2 min skew) - `jti` not seen recently → `invalid_request` (replay) - `auth_time` present and within `idJagMaxAuthAgeSeconds` → `login_required` (401) if too old - At least `email_verified` or `phone_number_verified` is `true` → `invalid_request` 6. Match or provision the user (see User Matching) 7. Check delegation: if `(iss, sub)` is known OR JIT-provisioned without collision → success 8. If email/phone collision with existing account but no delegation on file → `interaction_required` (401) with `claim` block 9. On success: sign an `identity_assertion` JWT and return it ### Handler: service_auth 1. Validate `login_hint` (email format) 2. Create a registration row with type `service_auth` 3. Generate `claim_token` (returned to agent once), `user_code` (6-digit), `claim_attempt_token` (embedded in verification_uri) 4. Store SHA-256 hashes of `claim_token` 5. Build `verification_uri` pointing to the service's login page with `return_to` parameter 6. Return the registration response with `claim` block containing `user_code`, `verification_uri`, `expires_in`, `interval` ### Handler: anonymous 1. Apply rate limits 2. Create a registration row 3. Sign an `identity_assertion` JWT with pre-claim scopes 4. Generate `claim_token` for deferred claim. Store only SHA-256 hash. 5. Return `identity_assertion` + `claim_token` + pre/post claim scopes --- ## ID-JAG Verification ### Trust List Maintain a registry of providers. Minimum entry: issuer URL. Richer entries can pin JWKS URI, CIMD URL, or attestation policy. ### JWKS Fetching - Fetch `{iss}/.well-known/jwks.json` on first use - Cache per `Cache-Control`, with floor 10 min, ceiling 24h - On `kid` miss, refetch once before rejecting ### CIMD Resolution If `client_id` is a URL: 1. Fetch as OAuth Client ID Metadata Document 2. Verify `jwks_uri` matches the one used to verify signature ### auth_time Validation - `auth_time` is **required** in ID-JAGs - Compare `now() - auth_time` against `idJagMaxAuthAgeSeconds` (service-configured, e.g., 3600) - If too old: return `login_required` (401) with `max_age` in the response - Agent must re-authenticate user at provider and mint fresh ID-JAG ### Replay Protection - Cache `jti` values with TTL of at least `exp - iat` + clock skew (typically 6 min) - Reject on collision with `invalid_request` --- ## Claim Ceremony The v2 claim ceremony is browser-based, borrowing from RFC 8628 device authorization. ### POST /agent/identity/claim (anonymous deferred claim) 1. Hash `claim_token`, look up registration 2. Reject if not found → `invalid_claim_token`, already claimed → `claimed_or_in_flight`, expired → `claim_expired` 3. Generate `user_code` (6-digit), `claim_attempt_token` 4. Build `verification_uri` with embedded `claim_attempt_token` 5. Return `claim_attempt` block with `user_code`, `verification_uri`, `expires_in`, `interval` ### Service-Hosted Claim Page When the user opens `verification_uri`: 1. Redirect to login if not authenticated 2. After login, show claim page displaying: - The user's identity ("You're signed in as jane@example.com") - The requesting agent/provider info (from PRM `resource_name`) - Input field for the 6-digit code 3. On correct code submission: mark claim as complete, associate registration with user 4. Incorrect code: show error, allow retry (up to limit) ### Claim Completion Flow When the user submits the correct `user_code` on the claim page: 1. Mark the claim as complete in the database 2. For anonymous: sign a new `identity_assertion` (v2) carrying user claims, superseding the pre-claim one 3. For service_auth: sign the first `identity_assertion` for this registration 4. The next poll at `/oauth2/token` with the claim grant returns the access_token + identity_assertion --- ## POST /oauth2/token — Token Endpoint Handles two grant types at the same endpoint: ### Grant: urn:ietf:params:oauth:grant-type:jwt-bearer (Token Exchange) ``` POST /oauth2/token Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded grant_type=urn:ietf:params:oauth:grant-type:jwt-bearer &assertion=<identity_assertion> &resource=<resource_url> (optional but recommended) ``` Processing: 1. Verify the `identity_assertion` JWT signature (service's own key) 2. Validate `exp` not passed → `invalid_grant` if expired 3. Check assertion not revoked → `invalid_grant` if revoked 4. Mint a fresh `access_token` scoped to the assertion's scopes 5. Return standard OAuth token response ### Grant: urn:workos:agent-auth:grant-type:claim (Claim Polling) ``` POST /oauth2/token Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded grant_type=urn:workos:agent-auth:grant-type:claim &claim_token=<claim_token> ``` Processing: 1. Hash `claim_token`, look up registration 2. If claim not yet completed → return `authorization_pending` 3. If user_code window expired → return `expired_token` 4. If polling too fast → return `slow_down` 5. If claim completed → mint access_token + return along with new `identity_assertion` Why a profile-specific grant URN? So this doesn't collide with services that also implement standard RFC 8628 device authorization at the same token endpoint. ### Error Responses | Error | HTTP | Condition | |-------|------|-----------| | `invalid_grant` | 400 | Assertion expired, revoked, or invalid | | `invalid_client` | 401 | client_id not recognized | | `unsupported_grant_type` | 400 | Not one of the two supported grants | | `authorization_pending` | 400 | Claim polling — user hasn't finished | | `expired_token` | 400 | user_code window closed | | `slow_down` | 400 | Polling too fast — add ≥5s | --- ## Revocation ### Credential Layer — POST /oauth2/revoke (RFC 7009) Agent-callable. Kills one access_token. ``` POST /oauth2/revoke Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded token=<access_token>&token_type_hint=access_token ``` - Return 200 on success (idempotent) - The underlying `identity_assertion` remains valid — agent can re-exchange for a new access_token ### Registration Layer — Events Endpoint (RFC 8935) Provider-driven. Receives Security Event Tokens. ``` POST /agent/event/notify Content-Type: application/secevent+jwt <SET JWT> ``` Processing: 1. Verify SET signature against issuer's JWKS 2. Enforce `jti` uniqueness 3. Match `events` key to supported schemas 4. For `https://schemas.workos.com/events/agent/auth/identity/assertion/revoked`: - Invalidate all identity_assertions for `(iss, sub, aud)` - Invalidate all derived access_tokens 5. Return 200 on success, 400 on verification failure ### Bulk Revocation Provide an operator-facing mechanism to revoke all outstanding identity_assertions and access_tokens for a tenant in one shot — for incident response. --- ## User Matching and JIT Provisioning Resolution order: 1. **Delegation record match** — if `(iss, sub)` has a delegation on file, route to that user. Strongest identifier. 2. **Verified email match** — if a user exists with same verified email: - If delegation exists for `(iss, sub)` → direct match (already covered above) - If NO delegation for `(iss, sub)` → `interaction_required` (401). User must confirm linking. 3. **Verified phone match** — same pattern. 4. **No match → JIT** — create a new user per provisioning policy, or refuse. Reject ID-JAGs with neither verified email nor verified phone. --- ## Rate Limiting ### Two Tiers | Tier | Checked | Default Anonymous | Default identity_assertion | |------|---------|-------------------|---------------------------| | Per-IP | First | 5/hour | 60/hour | | Per-tenant | Second | 100/hour | 1000/hour | ### Implementation - Sliding-window counter with shared store - Fail open on store errors - Return 429 with `Retry-After` header - Also rate-limit `/oauth2/token` polling (respect `interval` from claim block, reject with `slow_down`) --- ## Security ### Token Hashing | Token | Storage | Plaintext leaves server | |-------|---------|------------------------| | `claim_token` | SHA-256 hash | Once, in the registration response | | `user_code` | Stored for comparison | Displayed on claim page when user submits | | `identity_assertion` | Full JWT stored (or just signature hash for lookup) | In registration response | ### claim_token - Returned **exactly once** to the agent in the registration response - Agent holds in memory for ceremony duration — must not persist past Step 4 - High-entropy: prefix `clm_` + 25+ chars base62 ### auth_time Enforcement - Service configures `idJagMaxAuthAgeSeconds` (default: 3600) - Reject ID-JAGs where `now() - auth_time > idJagMaxAuthAgeSeconds` - Return `login_required` (401) with `max_age` field ### Consent UX - Surface `resource_name` and `resource_logo_uri` from PRM to user before identity assertion - The claim page should display who is requesting access (provider name from CIMD or ID-JAG metadata) ### user_code Security - 6-digit numeric code - 10-minute TTL (configurable via `expires_in`) - Tight retry limits (3-5 attempts) on the claim page - Code is tied to the `claim_attempt_token` embedded in `verification_uri` ### Replay Protection - `jti` cache mandatory for ID-JAGs - `jti` uniqueness enforced for SETs at events_endpoint - Shared store required for multi-replica deployments ### Trust List Discipline Treat the trusted-providers list as security-critical configuration. Changes should be audited. --- ## Audit Events ### Recommended Events | Event | When | Minimum Data | |-------|------|--------------| | `registration.created` | Successful POST /agent/identity | registration_id, registration_type, iss, sub (if ID-JAG) | | `registration.interaction_required` | 401 interaction_required returned | registration_id, iss, sub, matched_user_id | | `registration.login_required` | 401 login_required returned | iss, sub, auth_time, max_age | | `claim.initiated` | /agent/identity/claim called | registration_id, email | | `claim.completed` | User submitted correct user_code | registration_id, claimed_by_user_id | | `claim.expired` | user_code window or registration expired | registration_id | | `token.exchanged` | /oauth2/token jwt-bearer success | registration_id, access_token_id | | `token.revoked` | /oauth2/revoke called | access_token_id | | `registration.revoked` | SET processed at events_endpoint | registration_id, iss, sub | | `registration.expired` | Unclaimed registration past TTL | registration_id | --- ## Deploy Checklist ### Before publishing - [ ] PRM served at `/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource` with `resource_name` and `resource_logo_uri` - [ ] AS metadata served at `/.well-known/oauth-authorization-server` with `issuer`, `token_endpoint`, `revocation_endpoint`, `grant_types_supported`, and `agent_auth` block - [ ] `agent_auth` contains `identity_endpoint`, `claim_endpoint`, `events_endpoint` - [ ] `auth.md` served at the domain root - [ ] API returns `WWW-Authenticate` header on 401s - [ ] `POST /agent/identity` dispatches correctly by `type` - [ ] Trust list configured (if identity_assertion) - [ ] JWKS fetching with cache (if identity_assertion) - [ ] `auth_time` validation against `idJagMaxAuthAgeSeconds` (if identity_assertion) - [ ] `POST /agent/identity/claim` generates user_code + verification_uri (if service_auth/anonymous) - [ ] Claim page served at verification_uri (login → code input → confirm) - [ ] `POST /oauth2/token` handles jwt-bearer grant (assertion → access_token) - [ ] `POST /oauth2/token` handles claim grant (polling → access_token + identity_assertion) - [ ] `POST /oauth2/revoke` kills access_tokens (RFC 7009) - [ ] Events endpoint accepts SETs for registration revocation - [ ] Rate limiting active on `/agent/identity` and `/oauth2/token` - [ ] claim_token stored as SHA-256 hash - [ ] Replay protection for `jti` implemented - [ ] Audit events being recorded ### Recommended tests - [ ] identity_assertion: valid ID-JAG with fresh auth_time → identity_assertion returned - [ ] identity_assertion: expired ID-JAG → `invalid_request` - [ ] identity_assertion: auth_time too old → `login_required` (401) - [ ] identity_assertion: email collision without delegation → `interaction_required` (401) with claim block - [ ] identity_assertion: repeated `jti` → `invalid_request` (replay) - [ ] identity_assertion: unknown issuer → `issuer_not_enabled` - [ ] service_auth: valid email → registration with claim block (user_code + verification_uri) - [ ] anonymous: registration → identity_assertion with pre_claim_scopes - [ ] anonymous: claim initiation → claim_attempt with user_code - [ ] /oauth2/token jwt-bearer: valid assertion → access_token - [ ] /oauth2/token jwt-bearer: expired assertion → `invalid_grant` - [ ] /oauth2/token claim: before completion → `authorization_pending` - [ ] /oauth2/token claim: after completion → access_token + identity_assertion - [ ] /oauth2/token claim: after window expires → `expired_token` - [ ] /oauth2/token claim: too-fast polling → `slow_down` - [ ] /oauth2/revoke: valid access_token → 200 - [ ] events_endpoint: valid SET → registrations revoked - [ ] Rate limit exceeded → 429 - [ ] 401 on API → WWW-Authenticate header present -
metadata-schema.md 12 KB
# Metadata Schema JSON structure reference for the discovery documents and tokens required by the auth.md protocol (v2, June 2026). --- ## Protected Resource Metadata (PRM) Served at: `{resource_server}/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource` Defined by [RFC 9728](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9728). ```json { "resource": "https://api.example.com/", "resource_name": "Example Service", "resource_logo_uri": "https://example.com/logo.png", "authorization_servers": ["https://auth.example.com/"], "scopes_supported": ["read", "write", "admin"], "bearer_methods_supported": ["header"] } ``` ### Fields | Field | Required | Type | Description | |-------|----------|------|-------------| | `resource` | ✅ | string (URL) | Canonical URL of the API. Used as `aud` in ID-JAGs. | | `resource_name` | ✅ | string | Display name for consent prompts. Surface to user before asserting identity. | | `resource_logo_uri` | Recommended | string (URL) | Logo for consent UI. Surface alongside `resource_name`. | | `authorization_servers` | ✅ | string[] | Base URLs of OAuth AS(s). Agent fetches AS metadata from here. | | `scopes_supported` | ✅ | string[] | All scopes the resource server understands. | | `bearer_methods_supported` | ✅ | string[] | How credentials are presented. Typically `["header"]`. | --- ## Authorization Server Metadata Served at: `{authorization_server}/.well-known/oauth-authorization-server` Combines standard [RFC 8414](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8414) fields with the `agent_auth` profile block. ```json { "resource": "https://api.example.com/", "authorization_servers": ["https://auth.example.com/"], "scopes_supported": ["read", "write", "admin"], "bearer_methods_supported": ["header"], "issuer": "https://auth.example.com", "token_endpoint": "https://auth.example.com/oauth2/token", "revocation_endpoint": "https://auth.example.com/oauth2/revoke", "grant_types_supported": [ "urn:ietf:params:oauth:grant-type:jwt-bearer", "urn:workos:agent-auth:grant-type:claim" ], "agent_auth": { "skill": "https://example.com/auth.md", "identity_endpoint": "https://auth.example.com/agent/identity", "claim_endpoint": "https://auth.example.com/agent/identity/claim", "events_endpoint": "https://auth.example.com/agent/event/notify", "identity_types_supported": ["anonymous", "identity_assertion", "service_auth"], "identity_assertion": { "assertion_types_supported": [ "urn:ietf:params:oauth:token-type:id-jag" ] }, "events_supported": [ "https://schemas.workos.com/events/agent/auth/identity/assertion/revoked" ] } } ``` ### Top-Level OAuth Fields | Field | Required | Type | Description | |-------|----------|------|-------------| | `issuer` | ✅ | string (URL) | Canonical issuer URL of this AS. Validate `iss` claim of any token the AS signs against this. | | `token_endpoint` | ✅ | string (URL) | Where agents exchange identity assertions for access_tokens (Step 5) and poll during claim ceremony (Step 4c). | | `revocation_endpoint` | ✅ | string (URL) | Where agents POST to revoke an access_token ([RFC 7009](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7009)). | | `grant_types_supported` | ✅ | string[] | Grant types accepted at `token_endpoint`. Must include `urn:ietf:params:oauth:grant-type:jwt-bearer` (token exchange) and `urn:workos:agent-auth:grant-type:claim` (claim polling). | ### `agent_auth` Block Fields | Field | Required | Type | Description | |-------|----------|------|-------------| | `skill` | Recommended | string (URL) | URL of the auth.md file. | | `identity_endpoint` | ✅ | string (URL) | POST endpoint for registration (Step 3). | | `claim_endpoint` | Conditional | string (URL) | POST endpoint for claim initiation. Required if `service_auth` or `anonymous` supported. | | `events_endpoint` | Recommended | string (URL) | Receives Security Event Tokens ([RFC 8417](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8417)) from providers for registration-layer revocation. | | `identity_types_supported` | ✅ | string[] | `"anonymous"`, `"identity_assertion"`, `"service_auth"`, or combination. | | `identity_assertion` | Conditional | object | Required if `"identity_assertion"` in identity_types_supported. | | `identity_assertion.assertion_types_supported` | ✅ (if identity_assertion) | string[] | `"urn:ietf:params:oauth:token-type:id-jag"`. | | `events_supported` | Recommended | string[] | Event schemas this service can ingest (currently revocation). Informational. | ### identity_types → Flow Mapping | `identity_types_supported` | Flow | Ceremony | |---|---|---| | `identity_assertion` | ID-JAG verified by provider | None (unless `interaction_required`) | | `service_auth` | Email hint, browser-based ceremony | RFC 8628-style: user_code + verification_uri | | `anonymous` | No identity upfront | Optional deferred claim | --- ## ID-JAG Token (Identity Assertion JWT Authorization Grant) Defined by [draft-ietf-oauth-identity-assertion-authz-grant](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-oauth-identity-assertion-authz-grant). ### Header ```json { "typ": "oauth-id-jag+jwt", "alg": "ES256", "kid": "<provider-key-id>" } ``` ### Payload ```json { "iss": "https://api.agent-provider.com", "sub": "<opaque-user-identifier>", "aud": "https://api.example.com", "client_id": "<issuer-url-or-cimd-url>", "jti": "<unique-token-id>", "iat": 1716400000, "exp": 1716400300, "auth_time": 1716399000, "email": "user@example.com", "email_verified": true, "amr": ["mfa"], "name": "Jane Smith", "phone_number": "+15553805188", "phone_number_verified": false, "resource": "https://api.example.com", "agent_platform": "cursor", "agent_context_id": "chat-abc123" } ``` ### Required Claims | Claim | Description | |-------|-------------| | `iss` | Provider's issuer URL (must be on service's trust list) | | `sub` | Opaque user identifier at the provider | | `aud` | Service's `resource` URL from the PRM | | `client_id` | Provider identity (issuer URL or CIMD URL) | | `jti` | Unique token ID for replay protection | | `iat` | Issuance time (epoch seconds) | | `exp` | Expiration (typically iat + 5 minutes) | | `auth_time` | Epoch seconds when the user last authenticated at the provider. **Required.** Service rejects ID-JAGs whose auth_time is older than its `idJagMaxAuthAgeSeconds` window. | | `email` + `email_verified: true` OR `phone_number` + `phone_number_verified: true` | At least one verified contact required | ### Optional Claims | Claim | Description | |-------|-------------| | `amr` | Authentication methods reference (e.g., `["mfa"]`) | | `name` | User's display name | | `phone_number` | User's phone number | | `phone_number_verified` | Whether phone is verified | | `resource` | Resource server URL (informational) | | `agent_platform` | Agent platform (e.g., `"cursor"`, `"chatgpt"`) | | `agent_context_id` | Agent context/chat ID | --- ## Client ID Metadata Document (CIMD) Optional document that decouples provider identity from signing keys. Defined by [draft-ietf-oauth-client-id-metadata-document](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-client-id-metadata-document/). Hosted at the URL used as `client_id` in the ID-JAG. ```json { "client_id": "https://api.agent-provider.com/agent-auth.json", "client_name": "Agent Provider", "logo_uri": "https://agent-provider.com/logo.png", "client_uri": "https://agent-provider.com", "tos_uri": "https://agent-provider.com/tos", "policy_uri": "https://agent-provider.com/privacy", "token_endpoint_auth_method": "private_key_jwt", "jwks_uri": "https://agent-provider.com/.well-known/jwks.json", "scope": "openid email profile" } ``` --- ## Identity Assertion JWT (Service-Signed) After successful registration, the service returns an `identity_assertion` — a JWT signed by the service that the agent exchanges at `/oauth2/token` for an access_token. The identity_assertion is: - Reusable until it expires (`assertion_expires`) - Exchanged via `POST /oauth2/token` with `grant_type=urn:ietf:params:oauth:grant-type:jwt-bearer` - Replaced by a fresh one after claim ceremony completion (v2 carries user claims) --- ## Registration Response Shapes ### identity_assertion + id-jag (no confirmation needed) ```json { "registration_id": "reg_...", "registration_type": "identity_assertion", "identity_assertion": "<service-signed-jwt>", "assertion_expires": "2026-05-04T13:00:00.000Z", "scopes": ["read", "write"] } ``` ### identity_assertion + id-jag (interaction_required — 401) ```json { "error": "interaction_required", "error_description": "...", "registration_id": "reg_...", "registration_type": "identity_assertion", "claim_url": "https://auth.example.com/agent/identity/claim", "claim_token": "clm_...", "claim_token_expires": "...", "post_claim_scopes": ["read", "write"], "claim": { "user_code": "123456", "expires_in": 600, "verification_uri": "https://auth.example.com/login?return_to=...", "interval": 5 } } ``` ### service_auth ```json { "registration_id": "reg_...", "registration_type": "service_auth", "claim_url": "https://auth.example.com/agent/identity/claim", "claim_token": "clm_...", "claim_token_expires": "2026-05-21T17:31:25.994Z", "post_claim_scopes": ["read", "write"], "claim": { "user_code": "123456", "expires_in": 600, "verification_uri": "https://auth.example.com/login?return_to=...", "interval": 5 } } ``` ### anonymous ```json { "registration_id": "reg_...", "registration_type": "anonymous", "identity_assertion": "<service-signed-jwt>", "assertion_expires": "2026-05-04T13:00:00.000Z", "pre_claim_scopes": ["read"], "claim_url": "https://auth.example.com/agent/identity/claim", "claim_token": "clm_...", "claim_token_expires": "2026-05-21T17:26:32.915Z", "post_claim_scopes": ["read", "write"] } ``` ### Claim Ceremony Initiation (anonymous → POST /agent/identity/claim) ```json { "registration_id": "reg_...", "claim_attempt_id": "cla_...", "status": "initiated", "expires_at": "2026-05-21T17:31:25.994Z", "claim_attempt": { "user_code": "123456", "expires_in": 600, "verification_uri": "https://auth.example.com/login?return_to=...", "interval": 5 } } ``` ### Token Exchange Response (POST /oauth2/token — JWT-bearer grant) ```json { "access_token": "<token>", "token_type": "Bearer", "expires_in": 3600, "scope": "read write" } ``` ### Claim Polling Success (POST /oauth2/token — claim grant) ```json { "access_token": "<token>", "token_type": "Bearer", "expires_in": 3600, "scope": "read write", "identity_assertion": "<service-signed-jwt-v2>", "assertion_expires": "2026-05-21T18:31:25.994Z" } ``` --- ## Error Response Shape ```json { "error": "<error_code>", "error_description": "<human-readable description>" } ``` --- ## Revocation Two independent layers: ### Credential Layer (RFC 7009) — Agent-Callable ```http POST /oauth2/revoke Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded token=<access_token>&token_type_hint=access_token ``` Kills one access_token. 200 on success, idempotent. The `identity_assertion` remains intact — re-run Step 5 for a fresh access_token. ### Registration Layer (RFC 8935 SET delivery) — Provider-Driven Provider POSTs a Security Event Token (`Content-Type: application/secevent+jwt`) to the service's `events_endpoint`. The service invalidates the identity_assertion and all derived access_tokens. Agent discovers this when `/oauth2/token` returns `invalid_grant` — restart at Step 3. ### SET Payload ```json { "iss": "https://api.agent-provider.com", "sub": "<opaque-user-identifier>", "aud": "https://auth.example.com", "jti": "<unique-identifier>", "iat": 1716400000, "events": { "https://schemas.workos.com/events/agent/auth/identity/assertion/revoked": {} } } ``` ### Processing 1. Verify signature against the issuer's JWKS (same trust path as ID-JAG verification) 2. Enforce `jti` uniqueness for replay protection 3. Find all identity_assertions and access_tokens for `(iss, sub, aud)` and invalidate them 4. Return 200 on success, 400 on verification failure -
protocol-template.md 14.9 KB
# Protocol Template Canonical template for generating an `auth.md` file (v2, June 2026). Replace all `{{placeholders}}` with service-specific values. Delete sections for flows the service does not support. --- ## File Structure An auth.md is organized as a numbered walkthrough the agent follows top to bottom: 1. **Title and intro** — addressed to the agent, declares real hostnames (resource server + auth server) 2. **Step 1 — Discover** — two-hop discovery (PRM → AS metadata) 3. **Step 2 — Pick a method** — decision tree 4. **Step 3 — Register** — one subsection per supported method 5. **Step 4 — Claim ceremony** — browser-based user_code ceremony (if service_auth or anonymous claim) 6. **Step 5 — Exchange the assertion** — POST identity_assertion to /oauth2/token for access_token 7. **Step 6 — Use the access_token** — how to use and refresh 8. **Errors** — error codes table 9. **Revocation** — two-layer revocation model --- ## Complete Template ```markdown # auth.md You are an agent. This service supports **agentic registration**: discover → register → (claim if needed) → exchange for an access_token → call API → handle revocation. Follow the steps in order; do not skip ahead. Examples use placeholder hosts: `{{base_url}}` (the resource server hosting the API you want to call) and `{{auth_server_url}}` (the authorization server that handles registration). ## Step 1 — Discover Discovery is two hops. The 401 response that pointed you here carries a `WWW-Authenticate` header with the PRM URL: \```http HTTP/1.1 401 Unauthorized WWW-Authenticate: Bearer resource_metadata="{{base_url}}/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource" \``` ### 1a. Fetch the Protected Resource Metadata \```http GET /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource \``` Response: \```json { "resource": "{{base_url}}/", "resource_name": "{{service_name}}", "resource_logo_uri": "{{logo_url}}", "authorization_servers": ["{{auth_server_url}}/"], "scopes_supported": [{{scopes_list}}], "bearer_methods_supported": ["header"] } \``` ### 1b. Fetch the Authorization Server metadata \```http GET /.well-known/oauth-authorization-server \``` Response: \```json { "resource": "{{base_url}}/", "authorization_servers": ["{{auth_server_url}}/"], "scopes_supported": [{{scopes_list}}], "bearer_methods_supported": ["header"], "issuer": "{{auth_server_url}}", "token_endpoint": "{{auth_server_url}}/oauth2/token", "revocation_endpoint": "{{auth_server_url}}/oauth2/revoke", "grant_types_supported": [ "urn:ietf:params:oauth:grant-type:jwt-bearer", "urn:workos:agent-auth:grant-type:claim" ], "agent_auth": { "skill": "{{auth_md_url}}", "identity_endpoint": "{{auth_server_url}}/agent/identity", "claim_endpoint": "{{auth_server_url}}/agent/identity/claim", "events_endpoint": "{{auth_server_url}}/agent/event/notify", "identity_types_supported": [{{identity_types}}], "identity_assertion": { "assertion_types_supported": [{{assertion_types}}] }, "events_supported": [ "https://schemas.workos.com/events/agent/auth/identity/assertion/revoked" ] } } \``` ## Step 2 — Pick a method Use this decision tree: 1. **You have a session tied to a user identity and can exchange it for an ID-JAG, audience-bound to this service** → identity_assertion + id-jag. 2. **You have only the user's email** → service_auth. Claim ceremony required. 3. **You have neither** → anonymous. Claim ceremony optional; deferred until the user wants to take ownership. Before sending: cross-check your choice against the `agent_auth` block. If your type is not in `identity_types_supported`, pick another or stop. ## Step 3 — Register Before sending an `identity_assertion` or `service_auth` body, surface the service's `resource_name` and `resource_logo_uri` (from Step 1a) and the scope set you'll be acting under, and confirm with the user. Skip this for `anonymous`. ### identity_assertion + id-jag <!-- DELETE THIS SECTION IF NOT SUPPORTING ID-JAG FLOW --> Mint the ID-JAG with: - `aud` = the `resource` from the PRM - `iss` = your provider's issuer URL (must be on trust list) - `email_verified: true` OR `phone_number_verified: true` - Fresh `jti`, near-term `exp` (~5 minutes) - `auth_time` — epoch seconds when the user last authenticated at your provider. **Required.** \```http POST /agent/identity Content-Type: application/json { "type": "identity_assertion", "assertion_type": "urn:ietf:params:oauth:token-type:id-jag", "assertion": "<ID-JAG>" } \``` Response — no confirmation needed (200): \```json { "registration_id": "reg_...", "registration_type": "identity_assertion", "identity_assertion": "<service-signed-jwt>", "assertion_expires": "{{assertion_expiry}}", "scopes": [{{post_registration_scopes}}] } \``` Keep `identity_assertion` and go to Step 5. Response — confirmation required (401, `interaction_required`): \```json { "error": "interaction_required", "error_description": "...", "registration_id": "reg_...", "registration_type": "identity_assertion", "claim_url": "{{auth_server_url}}/agent/identity/claim", "claim_token": "clm_...", "claim_token_expires": "...", "post_claim_scopes": [{{post_claim_scopes}}], "claim": { "user_code": "123456", "expires_in": 600, "verification_uri": "{{auth_server_url}}/login?return_to=...", "interval": 5 } } \``` Surface `verification_uri` + `user_code` to the user (Step 4b) and poll (Step 4c). Response — login required (401, `login_required`): \```json { "error": "login_required", "error_description": "auth_time is too old; re-authenticate at the provider.", "max_age": 3600 } \``` Re-authenticate the user at your provider (`prompt=login`) and mint a fresh ID-JAG. ### service_auth <!-- DELETE THIS SECTION IF NOT SUPPORTING SERVICE_AUTH FLOW --> \```http POST /agent/identity Content-Type: application/json { "type": "service_auth", "login_hint": "user@example.com" } \``` Response (200): \```json { "registration_id": "reg_...", "registration_type": "service_auth", "claim_url": "{{auth_server_url}}/agent/identity/claim", "claim_token": "clm_...", "claim_token_expires": "{{claim_ttl}}", "post_claim_scopes": [{{post_claim_scopes}}], "claim": { "user_code": "123456", "expires_in": 600, "verification_uri": "{{auth_server_url}}/login?return_to=...", "interval": 5 } } \``` No `identity_assertion` yet. Go to Step 4. ### anonymous <!-- DELETE THIS SECTION IF NOT SUPPORTING ANONYMOUS FLOW --> \```http POST /agent/identity Content-Type: application/json { "type": "anonymous" } \``` Response (200): \```json { "registration_id": "reg_...", "registration_type": "anonymous", "identity_assertion": "<service-signed-jwt>", "assertion_expires": "{{assertion_expiry}}", "pre_claim_scopes": [{{pre_claim_scopes}}], "claim_url": "{{auth_server_url}}/agent/identity/claim", "claim_token": "clm_...", "claim_token_expires": "{{claim_ttl}}", "post_claim_scopes": [{{post_claim_scopes}}] } \``` The `identity_assertion` exchanges at `/oauth2/token` for an access_token with `pre_claim_scopes` immediately (Step 5). To upgrade scopes, go to Step 4. ## Step 4 — Claim ceremony <!-- DELETE THIS ENTIRE SECTION IF ONLY SUPPORTING identity_assertion WITHOUT interaction_required --> The end goal: get a signed-in user to confirm a 6-digit `user_code` **you supply them**. The code travels from you → user; the user authenticates to the service and types it into a page the service owns. ### 4a. Get the ceremony materials For **service_auth** registrations and **interaction_required** responses, you already have the `claim` block from Step 3. Skip to 4b. For **anonymous** registrations, initiate the ceremony: \```http POST /agent/identity/claim Content-Type: application/json { "claim_token": "clm_...", "email": "user@example.com" } \``` Response (200): \```json { "registration_id": "reg_...", "claim_attempt_id": "cla_...", "status": "initiated", "expires_at": "{{claim_attempt_ttl}}", "claim_attempt": { "user_code": "123456", "expires_in": 600, "verification_uri": "{{auth_server_url}}/login?return_to=...", "interval": 5 } } \``` ### 4b. Hand off to the user Surface `verification_uri` and `user_code` to the user in a single message: > Open this link, sign in (or sign up), and enter this 6-digit code: **123456** > {{verification_uri}} The user will: 1. Open `verification_uri` 2. Authenticate with the service (sign in or sign up) 3. Land on the claim page, see their identity displayed, type the `user_code`, and submit ### 4c. Poll for completion Poll the standard `token_endpoint` (from AS metadata) with the profile-specific claim grant: \```http POST /oauth2/token Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded grant_type=urn:workos:agent-auth:grant-type:claim &claim_token=<claim_token> \``` Response while waiting: \```json { "error": "authorization_pending", "error_description": "..." } \``` Response on success: \```json { "access_token": "<token>", "token_type": "Bearer", "expires_in": 3600, "scope": "{{scopes}}", "identity_assertion": "<service-signed-jwt-v2>", "assertion_expires": "{{assertion_expiry}}" } \``` Use `access_token` immediately; cache `identity_assertion` for refresh via Step 5. If the `user_code` window expires: \```json { "error": "expired_token", "error_description": "..." } \``` Re-call `POST /agent/identity/claim` with the same `claim_token` and `email` to mint a fresh `user_code`. If that returns `claim_expired`, restart at Step 3. Honor `interval` (in seconds); on `slow_down` back off. ## Step 5 — Exchange the assertion POST the `identity_assertion` to the token endpoint with the RFC 7523 JWT-bearer grant: \```http POST /oauth2/token Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded grant_type=urn:ietf:params:oauth:grant-type:jwt-bearer &assertion=<identity_assertion> &resource={{base_url}}/ \``` Response (200): \```json { "access_token": "<token>", "token_type": "Bearer", "expires_in": 3600, "scope": "{{scopes}}" } \``` The same `identity_assertion` can be re-used to mint additional access_tokens until it expires. If `/oauth2/token` returns `invalid_grant`, restart at Step 3. ## Step 6 — Use the access_token Present as a bearer token: \```http GET /api/some-resource Authorization: Bearer <access_token> \``` **Refresh:** When the access_token expires, re-call Step 5 with the same `identity_assertion`. When the identity_assertion itself expires or `/oauth2/token` returns `invalid_grant`, restart at Step 3. There is no refresh_token — the two-step pattern replaces it. On 401 for a previously-working access_token: try Step 5 once. If that also fails, restart at Step 1. Full API reference: `{{api_docs_url}}` ## Errors | Code | Where | What to do | |------|-------|------------| | `anonymous_not_enabled` | `/agent/identity` | Pick another method from Step 2 | | `service_auth_not_enabled` | `/agent/identity` | Pick another method | | `issuer_not_enabled` | `/agent/identity` | Provider not on trust list. Pick another method | | `invalid_request` | `/agent/identity` | Fix body shape, claims, signature, jti, aud problems | | `interaction_required` (401) | `/agent/identity` (ID-JAG) | Body carries `claim` block; surface to user (Step 4) | | `login_required` (401) | `/agent/identity` (ID-JAG) | Re-authenticate user at provider, mint fresh ID-JAG | | `invalid_claim_token` | `/agent/identity/claim` | Restart at Step 3 | | `claimed_or_in_flight` | `/agent/identity/claim` | Already claimed. Re-read Step 3 response | | `claim_expired` | `/agent/identity/claim` | Registration expired. Restart at Step 3 | | `invalid_grant` | `/oauth2/token` | Assertion expired/revoked. Restart at Step 3 | | `invalid_client` | `/oauth2/token` | client_id not recognized | | `unsupported_grant_type` | `/oauth2/token` | Use one of the two supported grant types | | `authorization_pending` | `/oauth2/token` (claim) | User hasn't completed ceremony. Honor `interval` | | `expired_token` | `/oauth2/token` (claim) | user_code window closed. Re-initiate or restart | | `slow_down` | `/oauth2/token` (claim) | Add ≥5s to interval and retry | | `rate_limited` (429) | any | Back off and retry | ## Revocation Two independent layers: - **Credential layer (RFC 7009):** POST `token=<access_token>&token_type_hint=access_token` to `{{auth_server_url}}/oauth2/revoke`. Kills one access_token. Identity assertion intact — re-run Step 5. - **Registration layer (RFC 8935 SET delivery):** Provider POSTs a Security Event Token to `events_endpoint`. Service invalidates identity_assertion and all derived access_tokens. Agent discovers this when `/oauth2/token` returns `invalid_grant` — restart at Step 3. On 401 for a previously-working access_token: try Step 5 once. If `/oauth2/token` succeeds, credential-layer revocation — fresh access_token works. If `invalid_grant`, registration-layer — restart at Step 3. ``` --- ## Placeholder Reference | Placeholder | Description | Example | |-------------|-------------|---------| | `{{base_url}}` | API base URL (resource server) | `https://api.acme.com` | | `{{service_name}}` | Human-readable service name | `Acme Notes` | | `{{logo_url}}` | Service logo URL | `https://acme.com/logo.png` | | `{{auth_server_url}}` | Authorization server base URL | `https://auth.acme.com` | | `{{auth_md_url}}` | URL where auth.md is hosted | `https://acme.com/auth.md` | | `{{scopes_list}}` | JSON array of scope strings | `"notes.read", "notes.write"` | | `{{identity_types}}` | Supported identity types | `"anonymous", "identity_assertion", "service_auth"` | | `{{assertion_types}}` | Supported assertion types | `"urn:ietf:params:oauth:token-type:id-jag"` | | `{{pre_claim_scopes}}` | Scopes before claim (anonymous) | `"notes.read"` | | `{{post_claim_scopes}}` | Scopes after claim | `"notes.read", "notes.write"` | | `{{post_registration_scopes}}` | Scopes after ID-JAG registration | `"notes.read", "notes.write"` | | `{{assertion_expiry}}` | Identity assertion expiry (ISO) | `2026-05-22T13:00:00.000Z` | | `{{claim_ttl}}` | Claim token expiration (ISO) | `2026-05-22T12:00:00.000Z` | | `{{claim_attempt_ttl}}` | Claim attempt expiration | `2026-05-22T12:10:00.000Z` | | `{{api_docs_url}}` | Link to full API docs | `https://docs.acme.com/` | --- ## Generation Rules 1. **Keep the file concise and high-signal** — anything the agent doesn't need to register or operate belongs in main documentation, not in auth.md 2. **Use fenced code blocks with language hints** (`http`, `json`) so agents can extract templates unambiguously 3. **Declare real hostnames in the intro** — resource server and auth server — so the agent knows which host each example targets 4. **Delete sections for unsupported flows** — don't leave empty sections or "N/A" markers 5. **The PRM is authoritative** — if anything in auth.md conflicts with the PRM, the PRM wins 6. **Token exchange is always required** — registration never returns an access_token directly; always returns an identity_assertion that must be exchanged at `/oauth2/token` -
validation-rules.md 10 KB
# Validation Rules Complete ruleset for validating `auth.md` files against the protocol specification (v2, June 2026). --- ## Level: Basic (Offline) ### Structure Rules | ID | Rule | Error Message | Severity | |----|------|---------------|----------| | S01 | Document starts with `# auth.md` heading | Missing required top-level heading `# auth.md` | 🔴 | | S02 | Contains `## Step 1 — Discover` section | Missing required section: Step 1 — Discover | 🔴 | | S03 | Contains `## Step 2 — Pick a method` section | Missing required section: Step 2 — Pick a method | 🔴 | | S04 | Contains `## Step 3 — Register` section | Missing required section: Step 3 — Register | 🔴 | | S05 | Contains `## Step 4 — Claim ceremony` section (if service_auth or anonymous with claim) | Missing required section: Step 4 — Claim ceremony (required when service_auth or anonymous claim is supported) | 🔴 | | S06 | Contains `## Step 5 — Exchange the assertion` section | Missing required section: Step 5 — Exchange the assertion | 🔴 | | S07 | Contains `## Step 6 — Use the access_token` section | Missing required section: Step 6 — Use the access_token | 🔴 | | S08 | Contains `## Errors` section | Missing required section: Errors | 🔴 | | S09 | Contains `## Revocation` section | Missing required section: Revocation | 🔴 | | S10 | Sections appear in correct order (Step 1 → 2 → 3 → 4 → 5 → 6 → Errors → Revocation) | Sections are out of order. Expected sequence: Step 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, Errors, Revocation | 🟡 | | S11 | Intro declares real hostnames (resource server and auth server) | Intro should declare real hostnames for resource and auth servers | 🟢 | ### Field Rules | ID | Rule | Error Message | Severity | |----|------|---------------|----------| | F01 | Step 1 contains at least one fenced JSON block with `resource` field | Step 1 must include Protected Resource Metadata JSON with `resource` field | 🔴 | | F02 | PRM JSON contains `resource_name` | Missing `resource_name` in PRM — agents need this for consent prompts | 🟡 | | F03 | PRM JSON contains `resource_logo_uri` | Missing `resource_logo_uri` — recommended for consent UX | 🟢 | | F04 | JSON metadata contains `authorization_servers` array | Missing `authorization_servers` — agents can't discover the auth endpoint | 🟡 | | F05 | JSON metadata contains `scopes_supported` array with ≥1 scope | Missing or empty `scopes_supported` | 🟡 | | F06 | AS metadata contains `agent_auth` block | Missing `agent_auth` block in Authorization Server metadata | 🔴 | | F07 | `agent_auth` contains `identity_endpoint` | Missing `identity_endpoint` in agent_auth block | 🔴 | | F08 | `agent_auth` contains `identity_types_supported` with ≥1 type | Missing or empty `identity_types_supported` | 🔴 | | F09 | If `identity_assertion` in identity_types_supported, `assertion_types_supported` must exist | Declared `identity_assertion` support but missing `assertion_types_supported` | 🟡 | | F10 | Step 3 contains at least one `POST /agent/identity` request example | Step 3 must include at least one registration request example | 🔴 | | F11 | Errors section contains a table with `Code`, `Where`, and `What to do` columns | Errors section must contain a table with Code, Where, and What to do columns | 🟡 | | F12 | `agent_auth` contains `skill` pointing to auth.md URL | Missing `skill` field in agent_auth — recommended for discoverability | 🟢 | | F13 | `agent_auth` contains `events_supported` | Missing `events_supported` — recommended for revocation support | 🟢 | | F14 | AS metadata contains `token_endpoint` | Missing `token_endpoint` — required for token exchange and claim polling | 🔴 | | F15 | AS metadata contains `revocation_endpoint` | Missing `revocation_endpoint` — required for credential-layer revocation | 🟡 | | F16 | AS metadata contains `grant_types_supported` with both required URNs | Missing or incomplete `grant_types_supported` — must include jwt-bearer and claim grant URNs | 🟡 | | F17 | If `service_auth` or `anonymous` in identity_types_supported, `claim_endpoint` must exist | service_auth/anonymous requires `claim_endpoint` for ceremony initiation | 🟡 | | F18 | `agent_auth` contains `events_endpoint` | Missing `events_endpoint` — recommended for registration-layer revocation | 🟢 | | F19 | Step 5 contains `POST /oauth2/token` with jwt-bearer grant | Step 5 must document the token exchange via /oauth2/token | 🔴 | ### Consistency Rules | ID | Rule | Error Message | Severity | |----|------|---------------|----------| | C01 | Flows documented in Step 3 match `identity_types_supported` in metadata | Mismatch: Step 3 documents flows not declared in metadata (or vice versa) | 🟡 | | C02 | If only identity_assertion flow without claim: Step 4 may be absent | Step 4 present but only identity_assertion flow without claim is supported | 🟡 | | C03 | `identity_endpoint` path matches the POST path in Step 3 examples | Registration endpoint in metadata doesn't match the POST path in Step 3 | 🟡 | | C04 | `claim_endpoint` path matches the POST path in Step 4 examples (if present) | Claim endpoint in metadata doesn't match the POST path in Step 4 | 🟡 | | C05 | Scopes in response examples are subset of `scopes_supported` | Response example contains scopes not listed in `scopes_supported` | 🟡 | | C06 | `resource` URL is consistent across all JSON blocks | Different `resource` URLs found in metadata blocks — must be consistent | 🟡 | | C07 | All URLs use HTTPS scheme | Non-HTTPS URL found — all endpoints must use HTTPS | 🟡 | | C08 | Error codes in table match standard protocol error codes (see list below) | Non-standard error code found | 🟡 | | C09 | `aud` in ID-JAG examples matches the `resource` from PRM | ID-JAG `aud` example doesn't match the resource URL | 🟡 | | C10 | `assertion_types_supported` includes types used in Step 3 examples | Step 3 uses assertion types not declared in metadata | 🟡 | | C11 | `token_endpoint` in metadata matches the `/oauth2/token` path used in Steps 4c and 5 | Token endpoint in metadata doesn't match the POST path in Steps 4c/5 | 🟡 | | C12 | `grant_types_supported` includes `urn:ietf:params:oauth:grant-type:jwt-bearer` | Missing jwt-bearer grant in grant_types_supported — required for token exchange | 🟡 | | C13 | `grant_types_supported` includes `urn:workos:agent-auth:grant-type:claim` (if claim ceremony exists) | Missing claim grant in grant_types_supported — required for ceremony polling | 🟡 | ### Format Rules | ID | Rule | Error Message | Severity | |----|------|---------------|----------| | X01 | All JSON in fenced code blocks is valid JSON | Invalid JSON in fenced code block at section: {section} | 🟡 | | X02 | HTTP request examples use valid HTTP method + path | Invalid HTTP request format. Expected: METHOD /path | 🟡 | | X03 | No unreplaced placeholder patterns (`{{...}}`, `<your-...>`, `[YOUR_...]`) | Unreplaced placeholder found: {placeholder} | 🟡 | | X04 | Fenced code blocks have language hint (`http`, `json`) | Code block missing language hint — agents use these to identify request shapes | 🟢 | --- ## Level: Full (Live) All Basic rules, plus: ### Endpoint Rules | ID | Rule | Error Message | Severity | |----|------|---------------|----------| | E01 | `GET {base_url}/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource` returns 200 with valid JSON | Protected Resource Metadata endpoint not reachable or returns invalid response | 🔴 | | E02 | PRM response contains `authorization_servers` pointing to AS with `agent_auth` block | No `agent_auth` block discoverable through PRM → AS metadata chain | 🔴 | | E03 | `GET {auth_server}/.well-known/oauth-authorization-server` returns 200 with valid JSON | Authorization Server metadata endpoint not reachable | 🔴 | | E04 | AS metadata `agent_auth` block matches declarations in auth.md | Live AS metadata `agent_auth` block differs from auth.md declarations | 🟡 | | E05 | `identity_endpoint` accepts POST (returns 400/401/422, not 404/405) | Registration endpoint returns 404 or 405 — not implemented | 🔴 | | E06 | `claim_endpoint` accepts POST (if service_auth or anonymous supported) | Claim endpoint returns 404 or 405 — not implemented | 🔴 | | E07 | `token_endpoint` accepts POST (returns 400/401, not 404/405) | Token endpoint returns 404 or 405 — not implemented | 🔴 | | E08 | `revocation_endpoint` accepts POST (returns 200/400, not 404/405) | Revocation endpoint returns 404 or 405 — not implemented | 🟡 | | E09 | API base URL returns 401 with `WWW-Authenticate` header containing `resource_metadata` | API does not return WWW-Authenticate header with resource_metadata on 401 | 🟡 | --- ## Standard Protocol Error Codes Complete list of error codes the Errors table should cover (per supported flows): ### Registration Endpoint (`/agent/identity`) - `anonymous_not_enabled` - `service_auth_not_enabled` - `issuer_not_enabled` - `invalid_request` (body shape, missing claims, signature, jti, aud, unverified identity) - `interaction_required` (401) — ID-JAG matched account but no (iss,sub) delegation - `login_required` (401) — auth_time missing or older than max_age - `rate_limited` (429) ### Claim Endpoint (`/agent/identity/claim`) - `invalid_claim_token` - `claimed_or_in_flight` - `claim_expired` ### Token Endpoint (`/oauth2/token`) - `invalid_grant` — assertion expired/revoked/replayed - `invalid_client` - `unsupported_grant_type` - `authorization_pending` — claim polling, user hasn't completed - `expired_token` — user_code window closed - `slow_down` — polling too fast ### All Endpoints - `rate_limited` (429) --- ## Validation Report Format ```markdown # Validation Report — auth.md **File:** {path_or_url} **Level:** {basic|full} **Date:** {timestamp} ## Summary - ✅ {n} rules passed - ❌ {n} rules failed - ⚠️ {n} warnings ## Structure | Status | ID | Rule | |--------|-----|-------| | ✅ | S01 | Heading `# auth.md` present | | ❌ | S06 | Step 5 section missing | ## Fields ... ## Consistency ... ## Format ... ## Endpoints (full only) ... ```
-
-
SKILL.md 17.2 KB
--- name: auth-md description: > Generate, validate, and explain `auth.md` files — the open protocol for AI agent registration. Use when making apps agent-ready, generating Protected Resource Metadata (RFC 9728), validating auth.md files, or implementing agent registration endpoints. Triggers on "auth.md", "agent registration", "agent auth", "make my app agent-ready", "ID-JAG", "identity_assertion", "service_auth", "protected resource metadata", "agentic registration". metadata: author: https://ft.ia.br version: "2.0" date: 2026-06-27 repository: https://github.com/fabricioctelles/skills license: Apache 2.0 category: library-and-api-reference --- # auth-md Generate, validate, and explain the **auth.md** protocol — the open standard that lets AI agents register for services on behalf of users, without signup forms. --- ## Protocol Context auth.md is a Markdown file published at a service's root (typically `https://service.com/auth.md`) that instructs agents on how to register. It works simultaneously as human-readable documentation and as a discoverable runtime artifact for agents. The protocol extends RFC 9728 (OAuth 2.0 Protected Resource Metadata) with an `agent_auth` block in the Authorization Server metadata. Registration returns an `identity_assertion` (service-signed JWT) that the agent exchanges at `/oauth2/token` for an `access_token`. Three registration methods are supported: | Flow | Mechanism | When to use | |------|-----------|-------------| | **identity_assertion** | Provider signs an ID-JAG (with `auth_time`) asserting user identity. Service verifies JWKS, returns `identity_assertion`. Agent exchanges at `/oauth2/token`. | Service does JIT provisioning from OIDC/SAML; wants zero-friction registration. | | **service_auth** | Email hint + browser-based ceremony. Agent receives `user_code` + `verification_uri`; user signs in and types code. Agent polls `/oauth2/token`. | Agents on platforms that can't mint ID-JAGs; self-serve without trust list. | | **anonymous** | No identity upfront. Immediate `identity_assertion` with pre-claim scopes. Optional deferred claim for scope upgrade. | Agent needs basic access immediately; human ownership binding deferred. | ### Protocol Endpoints | Endpoint | Purpose | |----------|---------| | `/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource` | Discovery — resource metadata (RFC 9728) | | `/.well-known/oauth-authorization-server` | Discovery — AS metadata with `agent_auth` block | | `POST /agent/identity` | Registration — dispatches on `type` field | | `POST /agent/identity/claim` | Claim initiation (anonymous deferred, or re-initiate expired user_code) | | `POST /oauth2/token` | Token exchange (JWT-bearer grant) + claim polling (claim grant) | | `POST /oauth2/revoke` | Credential-layer revocation (RFC 7009) | | `events_endpoint` | Registration-layer revocation (receives SETs, RFC 8935) | ### Token Lifecycle Registration **never** returns an `access_token` directly. The flow is: 1. Registration → `identity_assertion` (service-signed JWT, reusable until expiry) 2. Exchange → `POST /oauth2/token` with `grant_type=urn:ietf:params:oauth:grant-type:jwt-bearer` → `access_token` 3. Refresh → re-exchange same `identity_assertion` when access_token expires 4. Expired assertion → restart at registration (Step 3) ### Claim Ceremony (v2 — Browser-Based) The claim ceremony uses RFC 8628-style device authorization: 1. Registration returns `user_code` + `verification_uri` in a `claim` block 2. Agent surfaces both to the user 3. User opens `verification_uri`, signs in to the service, types the 6-digit code 4. Agent polls `POST /oauth2/token` with `grant_type=urn:workos:agent-auth:grant-type:claim` + `claim_token` 5. On success: receives `access_token` + fresh `identity_assertion` --- ## Operation Modes | Parameter | Default | Description | |-----------|---------|-------------| | `mode` | `generate` | `generate` = create auth.md + metadata; `validate` = check existing auth.md; `explain` = explain the protocol | | `validation_level` | `basic` | `basic` = structure + fields + consistency (offline); `full` = basic + live endpoint fetch | | `flows` | `all` | Which flows to include: `identity_assertion`, `service_auth`, `anonymous`, `all` | | `role` | `app` | Perspective: `app` = service accepting registrations; `provider` = platform minting ID-JAGs | --- ## Workflow: Generate ### 1. Scan the codebase Look for: - Existing API routes and authentication patterns - Defined scopes/permissions - Framework (Express, Django, Rails, FastAPI, NestJS, etc.) - Base URL and auth server URL configuration - Existing authentication middleware - User models and provisioning mechanisms ### 2. Ask the user only what cannot be inferred - Which flows to support (identity_assertion, service_auth, anonymous, or combination) - Pre-claim scopes vs post-claim scopes (if anonymous) - Trusted agent providers and trust list policy (if identity_assertion) - Whether the service already does JIT provisioning or requires manual onboarding - `idJagMaxAuthAgeSeconds` value (default: 3600) - Desired rate limiting policy ### 3. Generate artifacts Produce three artifacts: **a) `auth.md`** — Markdown file following the protocol template (see `references/protocol-template.md`). Must contain: - Title and intro addressed to the agent - Step 1 — Discover (two hops: PRM → AS metadata) - Step 2 — Pick a method (decision tree) - Step 3 — Register (one subsection per supported method) - Step 4 — Claim ceremony (if service_auth or anonymous with claim) - Step 5 — Exchange the assertion (POST /oauth2/token with jwt-bearer grant) - Step 6 — Use the access_token - Errors (complete table with all applicable codes) - Revocation (two layers) **b) `oauth-protected-resource.json`** — JSON for `/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource` with `resource_name` and `resource_logo_uri` **c) `oauth-authorization-server.json`** — JSON for `/.well-known/oauth-authorization-server` with: - `issuer`, `token_endpoint`, `revocation_endpoint`, `grant_types_supported` - Complete `agent_auth` block with `identity_endpoint`, `claim_endpoint`, `events_endpoint` ### 4. Generate implementation guidance "Next Steps" section with: - How to serve `auth.md` at the domain root - How to serve metadata at the well-known paths - How to add `WWW-Authenticate` header to 401 responses - Endpoint implementation guidance (without generating framework-specific code unless requested) - Token exchange implementation at `/oauth2/token` - Claim page hosting (verification_uri → login → code input → confirm) - Recommended rate limiting configuration - Recommended audit events - Security considerations (token hashing, auth_time validation, replay protection, claim_token handling) ### 5. Generate Agent Provider guide (if role=provider) When the user is an agent provider (not an app), generate: - How to mint audience-specific ID-JAGs with `auth_time` - Token structure (header + payload with required and optional claims) - How to publish JWKS - Optionally: how to publish a CIMD (Client ID Metadata Document) - How to implement revocation (POST SET to events_endpoint) - How to present consent to the user before asserting identity (using `resource_name` + `resource_logo_uri`) --- ## Workflow: Validate ### 1. Load the auth.md From a local file path or URL. ### 2. Run validation at the requested level **Basic (offline):** - All required headings present (Step 1–6, Errors, Revocation) - At least one flow documented - Valid JSON in fenced code blocks for request/response shapes - AS metadata contains `identity_endpoint`, `token_endpoint`, `grant_types_supported` - Error table with standard error codes - Consistency: flows in prose match `identity_types_supported` in metadata JSON - No unreplaced placeholders **Full (live):** - All basic checks, plus: - Fetch `/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource` from the declared base URL - Verify `agent_auth` block exists in AS metadata - Fetch `/.well-known/oauth-authorization-server` and verify consistency - Check that `identity_endpoint`, `token_endpoint`, `revocation_endpoint` respond (accept 400/401/422, reject 404/405) - Verify API returns 401 with `WWW-Authenticate` containing `resource_metadata` ### 3. Report results Checklist with ✅/❌ per rule, grouped by category: - **Structure** — headings and order - **Fields** — required fields in JSONs - **Consistency** — cross-references between prose and metadata - **Format** — valid JSON, valid HTTP, no placeholders - **Endpoints** (full only) — reachability and correct responses Include severity: 🔴 Error (agents will fail), 🟡 Warning (degraded experience), 🟢 Info (suggestion). See `references/validation-rules.md` for the complete ruleset. --- ## Workflow: Explain When the user wants to understand the protocol without generating or validating: 1. Identify what the user wants to know (overview, specific flow, specific endpoint, security, etc.) 2. Explain using the protocol context above and the references 3. Use text-based sequence diagrams when helpful 4. Point to official documentation when relevant --- ## User Matching and JIT Provisioning The identity_assertion flow needs to decide which service user a registration represents. Recommended resolution order: 1. **Delegation record match** — if `(iss, sub)` has a delegation on file, route to same user 2. **Verified email match** — if a user exists with same verified email BUT no `(iss, sub)` delegation → `interaction_required` (401) with claim block for user to confirm linking 3. **Verified phone match** — same pattern 4. **No match → JIT** — create a new user per provisioning policy, or refuse Reject ID-JAGs with neither a verified email nor a verified phone — there's no basis for matching. --- ## Rate Limiting The `/agent/identity` endpoint is unauthenticated for anonymous registration. Implement two tiers: 1. **Per-IP** (checked first) — prevents a single source from consuming the tenant's budget. Default: 5/hour anonymous, 60/hour identity_assertion. 2. **Per-tenant** (checked second) — global cap across IPs. Default: 100/hour anonymous, 1000/hour identity_assertion. Also rate-limit `/oauth2/token` polling — enforce `interval` from the claim block, reject with `slow_down` if too fast. --- ## Recommended Audit Events | Event | When | Data | |-------|------|------| | `registration.created` | Successful POST /agent/identity | registration_id, registration_type, iss, sub | | `registration.interaction_required` | 401 interaction_required | registration_id, iss, sub, matched_user_id | | `registration.login_required` | 401 login_required | iss, sub, auth_time, max_age | | `claim.initiated` | /agent/identity/claim called | registration_id, email | | `claim.completed` | User submitted correct user_code | registration_id, claimed_by_user_id | | `claim.expired` | user_code window or registration expired | registration_id | | `token.exchanged` | /oauth2/token jwt-bearer success | registration_id, access_token_id | | `token.revoked` | /oauth2/revoke called | access_token_id | | `registration.revoked` | SET processed at events_endpoint | registration_id, iss, sub | --- ## Security Considerations - **auth_time validation** — `auth_time` is required in ID-JAGs. Service validates against `idJagMaxAuthAgeSeconds`. If too old, returns `login_required` (401) — agent must get user to re-authenticate at provider. - **claim_token handling** — returned exactly once in the registration response. Agent holds in memory only for ceremony duration. Do not persist past Step 4. - **Token hashing** — `claim_token` is a bearer secret. Store only SHA-256 hash server-side. - **Consent UX** — surface `resource_name` and `resource_logo_uri` from PRM to the user before asserting identity. This is the user's only consent gate. - **Two revocation layers** — credential layer (agent-callable, `/oauth2/revoke`, kills one access_token) vs registration layer (provider-driven SETs at `events_endpoint`, kills identity_assertion + all derived tokens). - **Replay protection** — cache `jti` values with TTL of at least `exp - iat` + clock skew (typically 6 min). - **CIMD resolution** — if `client_id` is a URL, fetch as Client ID Metadata Document and verify `jwks_uri`. - **Bulk revocation** — provide operator-facing mechanism to revoke all outstanding identity_assertions for a tenant. --- ## Error Codes Reference | Code | Where | Meaning | |------|-------|---------| | `anonymous_not_enabled` | `/agent/identity` | Service doesn't accept anonymous | | `service_auth_not_enabled` | `/agent/identity` | service_auth disabled | | `issuer_not_enabled` | `/agent/identity` | Provider not on trust list | | `invalid_request` | `/agent/identity` | Body/claim/signature/jti/aud problems | | `interaction_required` (401) | `/agent/identity` | ID-JAG matched account, no delegation — claim needed | | `login_required` (401) | `/agent/identity` | auth_time too old — re-authenticate at provider | | `invalid_claim_token` | `/agent/identity/claim` | Token wrong or expired | | `claimed_or_in_flight` | `/agent/identity/claim` | Already claimed or wrong endpoint | | `claim_expired` | `/agent/identity/claim` | Registration expired | | `invalid_grant` | `/oauth2/token` | Assertion expired/revoked | | `invalid_client` | `/oauth2/token` | client_id not recognized | | `unsupported_grant_type` | `/oauth2/token` | Not jwt-bearer or claim grant | | `authorization_pending` | `/oauth2/token` (claim) | User hasn't completed ceremony | | `expired_token` | `/oauth2/token` (claim) | user_code window closed | | `slow_down` | `/oauth2/token` (claim) | Polling too fast | | `rate_limited` (429) | any | Back off and retry | --- ## Agent Readiness Scanner Check The [isitagentready.com](https://isitagentready.com) scanner validates auth.md as the `authMd` check. Pass criteria: 1. `/auth.md` served from site root with HTTP 200 2. Content is Markdown with H1 heading containing "auth.md" 3. Optionally validates OAuth Protected Resource Metadata at `/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource` 4. Optionally validates Authorization Server metadata at `/.well-known/oauth-authorization-server` **To pass the check minimally:** ```markdown # auth.md This service accepts AI agent registrations. ## Authentication Agents can register via POST /agent/identity with a valid ID-JAG. See below for supported methods. ``` **To pass with full marks (all metadata):** - Serve `/auth.md` with proper heading - Publish `/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource` with `resource`, `resource_name`, `resource_logo_uri`, `authorization_servers`, `scopes_supported`, `bearer_methods_supported: ["header"]` - Publish `/.well-known/oauth-authorization-server` with `issuer`, `token_endpoint`, `revocation_endpoint`, `grant_types_supported`, and `agent_auth` block containing `skill`, `identity_endpoint`, `claim_endpoint`, `events_endpoint`, and registration methods **Scan command:** ```bash curl -s -X POST 'https://isitagentready.com/api/scan' \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \ -d '{"url":"https://YOUR-DOMAIN/","enabledChecks":["authMd"]}' | jq '.checks.discovery.authMd' ``` --- ## Quality Checklist Before delivering output, verify: - [ ] Generated `auth.md` contains all required steps (1-6) + Errors + Revocation - [ ] AS metadata includes `issuer`, `token_endpoint`, `revocation_endpoint`, `grant_types_supported` - [ ] `agent_auth` block includes `identity_endpoint`, `claim_endpoint`, `events_endpoint` - [ ] `identity_types_supported` matches the flows the user chose - [ ] `scopes_supported` reflects actual API scopes found in codebase - [ ] Base URLs are consistent between auth.md and metadata JSON - [ ] Error codes table includes all standard codes for the supported flows - [ ] Step 5 documents token exchange at `/oauth2/token` with jwt-bearer grant - [ ] Revocation section documents both layers (credential + registration) - [ ] No unreplaced placeholder values (`{{...}}`, `<your-...>`, `[YOUR_...]`) - [ ] Validation report covers all rules for the requested level - [ ] Rate limiting documented (including /oauth2/token polling) - [ ] Security considerations included (auth_time, claim_token, consent UX) - [ ] If role=provider: ID-JAG structure with `auth_time` documented --- ## References - `references/protocol-template.md` — Complete auth.md template with all sections and placeholders - `references/validation-rules.md` — Full validation ruleset with error messages and severities - `references/metadata-schema.md` — JSON schema for PRM, AS metadata, ID-JAG, and identity_assertion - `references/example-auth-md.md` — Working example of a complete auth.md file (Acme Notes) - `references/implementation-guide.md` — Server-side implementation guide with token exchange, claim ceremony, revocation, and security --- ## Updating Protocol Knowledge This skill ships with a snapshot of the auth.md protocol specification (v2, June 2026). When possible, fetch the latest version from: - Skill Home and Doc Hub: `https://auth-md.com` - Spec: `https://raw.githubusercontent.com/workos/auth.md/refs/heads/main/AUTH.md` - Docs overview: `https://workos.com/auth-md/docs` - Apps guide: `https://workos.com/auth-md/docs/apps` - Agent providers guide: `https://workos.com/auth-md/docs/agent-providers` - File anatomy: `https://workos.com/auth-md/docs/auth-md` If fetch fails, use the bundled `references/` as the source of truth.
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation.
Reviews (0)
No reviews yet.
No comments yet.