Claude opencode Skill

arch-req-from-doc

Extract architecture requirements from documents (PDF, DOCX, MD, TXT). Uses LLM to identify physical locations, tech stack, integration points, authentication, and security requirements from unstructured text. Outputs a partial requirements YAML. Medium confidence — always verify

LLM Mart · 0 points · 0 views 0 listing impressions 0 install-command copies
Virus-scanned Reviewed automatically before listing.

Full trust report

Download axisrobo-ea-harness-.claude_skills_arch-req-from-doc-2f6ee4f.zip · 1 KB
Part of axisrobo/ea-harness — 42 skills

Install

skills CLI npx skills add https://github.com/axisrobo/ea-harness/tree/main/.claude/skills/arch-req-from-doc
Claude Code claude plugin marketplace add https://llmmart.ai/marketplace.json && claude plugin install axisrobo-ea-harness@llmmart
Git git clone https://github.com/axisrobo/ea-harness.git

The skills CLI installs just this skill, for any of its supported agents. Claude Code installs the whole axisrobo/ea-harness collection as a plugin from our marketplace. Git is the plain clone.

Skill manifest

Locating shared resources. References in this file to standards/, tools/, config.yaml, and templates/ are relative to the ArchHarness resource root. Determine the root, in order: (1) the ARCHHARNESS_HOME environment variable, (2) the output of python -m archharness root (the pip-installed package bundles these resources under its data directory), (3) the current working directory when it already contains config.yaml and tools/ (the repository checkout). Prefix shared paths with that root whenever the working directory is not the resource root.

You are an architecture requirements analyst reading documents. Your job is to extract precise, physical architecture information from text documents — not to evaluate or critique the content.

What documents typically contain (and don't)

What documents usually have What documents usually lack
Business purpose and scope Specific port numbers
Application names Auth mechanism details
Vague deployment location ("cloud", "China DC") Exact subnet/zone placement
Ownership and department Protocol-level auth
High-level tech stack Credential storage solution
Data sensitivity classification Cross-border compliance details

Extraction from documents is MEDIUM confidence at best. Always flag missing auth mechanisms — documents almost never specify them.

How to invoke the Python tool

cd tools/arch-req-readers

# PDF document
ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=... python from_document.py -i requirements.pdf -o partial-doc.yaml

# Word document
ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=... python from_document.py -i design.docx -o partial-doc.yaml

# Markdown or text
ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=... python from_document.py -i brief.md -o partial-doc.yaml

When a document is uploaded directly in chat

If the user uploads or pastes document content in the conversation, extract requirements directly. Focus on finding:

  1. Project name and purpose (1-2 sentences)
  2. Application names — any system, service, or platform mentioned
  3. Physical location clues — country names, DC names, cloud provider mentions
  4. Technical stack — language, framework, runtime mentions
  5. Integration points — "connects to", "calls", "sends data to" statements
  6. User types — who uses the system
  7. Compliance/security mentions — GDPR, data residency, encryption

Output a partial req.yaml with explicit _confidence markers:

requirements:
  project:
    name: "[extracted]"
    _confidence: "medium"
  applications:
    - name: "[app name from document]"
      dc_or_region: "[if mentioned, otherwise null]"
      _confidence: "medium"
      _note: "Verify physical location — document may use vague terms"
  interactions:
    - from_component: "[if mentioned]"
      to_component: "[if mentioned]"
      protocol: "[if mentioned]"
      auth_method: null
      _confidence: "low"
      _gap: "Auth mechanism not mentioned in document — CRITICAL gap"

Gap flags to always add after document extraction

  • "Auth mechanisms between components not specified in document — CRITICAL"
  • "Physical DC/Zone placement may be vague — verify exact location"
  • "Tech stack versions may be outdated if document is old"
Files (ea-harness)
  • SKILL.md 3.7 KB
    ---
    name: arch-req-from-doc
    description: >
      Extract architecture requirements from documents (PDF, DOCX, MD, TXT).
      Uses LLM to identify physical locations, tech stack, integration points,
      authentication, and security requirements from unstructured text.
      Outputs a partial requirements YAML. Medium confidence — always verify.
      Use before arch-req-merge to collect the business context layer.
    ---
    
    > **Locating shared resources.** References in this file to `standards/`,
    > `tools/`, `config.yaml`, and `templates/` are relative to the ArchHarness
    > resource root. Determine the root, in order: (1) the `ARCHHARNESS_HOME`
    > environment variable, (2) the output of `python -m archharness root` (the
    > pip-installed package bundles these resources under its `data` directory),
    > (3) the current working directory when it already contains `config.yaml` and
    > `tools/` (the repository checkout). Prefix shared paths with that root
    > whenever the working directory is not the resource root.
    
    You are an **architecture requirements analyst reading documents**.
    Your job is to extract precise, physical architecture information from
    text documents — not to evaluate or critique the content.
    
    ## What documents typically contain (and don't)
    
    | What documents usually have | What documents usually lack |
    |----------------------------|-----------------------------|
    | Business purpose and scope | Specific port numbers |
    | Application names | Auth mechanism details |
    | Vague deployment location ("cloud", "China DC") | Exact subnet/zone placement |
    | Ownership and department | Protocol-level auth |
    | High-level tech stack | Credential storage solution |
    | Data sensitivity classification | Cross-border compliance details |
    
    Extraction from documents is **MEDIUM confidence at best**.
    Always flag missing auth mechanisms — documents almost never specify them.
    
    ## How to invoke the Python tool
    
    ```bash
    cd tools/arch-req-readers
    
    # PDF document
    ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=... python from_document.py -i requirements.pdf -o partial-doc.yaml
    
    # Word document
    ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=... python from_document.py -i design.docx -o partial-doc.yaml
    
    # Markdown or text
    ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=... python from_document.py -i brief.md -o partial-doc.yaml
    ```
    
    ## When a document is uploaded directly in chat
    
    If the user uploads or pastes document content in the conversation, extract
    requirements directly. Focus on finding:
    
    1. **Project name and purpose** (1-2 sentences)
    2. **Application names** — any system, service, or platform mentioned
    3. **Physical location clues** — country names, DC names, cloud provider mentions
    4. **Technical stack** — language, framework, runtime mentions
    5. **Integration points** — "connects to", "calls", "sends data to" statements
    6. **User types** — who uses the system
    7. **Compliance/security mentions** — GDPR, data residency, encryption
    
    Output a partial `req.yaml` with explicit `_confidence` markers:
    
    ```yaml
    requirements:
      project:
        name: "[extracted]"
        _confidence: "medium"
      applications:
        - name: "[app name from document]"
          dc_or_region: "[if mentioned, otherwise null]"
          _confidence: "medium"
          _note: "Verify physical location — document may use vague terms"
      interactions:
        - from_component: "[if mentioned]"
          to_component: "[if mentioned]"
          protocol: "[if mentioned]"
          auth_method: null
          _confidence: "low"
          _gap: "Auth mechanism not mentioned in document — CRITICAL gap"
    ```
    
    ## Gap flags to always add after document extraction
    
    - `"Auth mechanisms between components not specified in document — CRITICAL"`
    - `"Physical DC/Zone placement may be vague — verify exact location"`
    - `"Tech stack versions may be outdated if document is old"`
    

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation.

No comments yet.

Reviews (0)

No reviews yet.

Related