Claude Skill

agent-impl-notes-log

Keep a running impl-notes file next to the phase meeting log while a subagent executes a task, recording design decisions, intentional deviations from spec, tradeoffs, and open questions as they happen rather than after the fact. Use at the start of any non-trivial subagent dispa

LLM Mart · 0 points · 0 views 0 listing impressions 0 install-command copies
Virus-scanned Reviewed automatically before listing.

Full trust report

Download wei18-apple-dev-skills-collaboration-skills_skills_agent-impl-notes-log-7ea7e61.zip · 2 KB
Part of wei18/apple-dev-skills — 37 skills

Install

skills CLI npx skills add https://github.com/wei18/apple-dev-skills/tree/main/collaboration-skills/skills/agent-impl-notes-log
Claude Code claude plugin marketplace add https://llmmart.ai/marketplace.json && claude plugin install wei18-apple-dev-skills@llmmart
Git git clone https://github.com/wei18/apple-dev-skills.git

The skills CLI installs just this skill, for any of its supported agents. Claude Code installs the whole wei18/apple-dev-skills collection as a plugin from our marketplace. Git is the plain clone.

Skill manifest

Agent Implementation Notes — Running Log

Invoke with a topic argument (frontmatter argument-hint: "[topic]").

Purpose

The phase meeting log (meetings/{date}_{topic}.md) is summative — written after work completes. By that point, dozens of micro-decisions made mid-flight are already lost to the commit diff. An impl-notes log fills that gap: a concurrent record of decisions, deviations, tradeoffs, and unresolved questions, written as they happen.

When to invoke

Subagent MUST invoke this skill at the start of any dispatch matching ANY of:

  • Implements behavior whose spec has known ambiguity (e.g., // UNCONFIRMED markers, "Unconfirmed ?" prerequisites).
  • Introduces a new dependency, target, or module.
  • Refactors existing code beyond a one-line fix.
  • Any M- or L-size task by your workflow's task-sizing convention, if it has one (touches ≥2 files, adds new behavior, or gets a spec/plan before code).

Subagent MAY skip this skill for trivial one-line fixes, pure typo corrections, or documentation copy edits.

File layout

Path: meetings/{YYYY-MM-DD}_{topic}.impl-notes.md

Paired naming with the phase meeting log. If the phase log is meetings/2026-05-20_phase-11-foo.md, the impl-notes is meetings/2026-05-20_phase-11-foo.impl-notes.md.

If multiple subagents work on the same topic on the same day, append a numeric suffix: meetings/2026-05-20_topic.impl-notes.2.md.

File format

# Impl Notes — {topic} ({date})

Status: IN_PROGRESS
Owner: {subagent type, e.g. "Senior Developer"}
Dispatched by: Leader
Started: {ISO timestamp}

## 設計決定 (Design decisions)

_What you chose when the spec was ambiguous. Include the spec reference._

- **{decision name}** — Spec `docs/design.md §X.Y` says "...". Ambiguous on Z. Chose **A** because [reason]. Alternative was B (see §折衷).

## 偏離 (Deviations)

_Intentional deviations from the documented spec. Include the spec reference and the why._

- **{deviation name}** — Spec says X. Implemented as Y because [reason]. Downstream impact: [what changes for callers / tests / docs].

## 折衷 (Tradeoffs)

_Alternatives considered and the reasoning for the current pick._

- **{tradeoff topic}** — Considered: [A, B, C]. Picked **B** because [reason]. Rejected A because [reason]; rejected C because [reason].

## 未決 (Open questions)

_Things you want Leader / User to confirm. Be specific. Block on these before final report if they're load-bearing._

- **{question}** — [specific question]. Default behavior I picked: [X]. Risk if I'm wrong: [impact].

How to update

  • Update incrementally — write the entry as you make the decision, NOT in a batch at the end. The whole point is to capture context that fades.
  • Keep entries terse but self-contained — one bullet should be readable months later without re-reading the diff.
  • Cite spec sections by section number (§How.4.7) so Leader can verify against the source.
  • Cross-link related entries if a 折衷 decision later becomes a 偏離.
  • Don't duplicate the diff — the file is for context, not code listings.

Status transitions

  • IN_PROGRESS — work ongoing; file may be edited any time.
  • COMPLETE — work finished, ready for Leader review. Set this before reporting back.
  • BLOCKED — work paused awaiting Leader/User answer to an §未決 item. Required when an open question is load-bearing.

Subagent dispatch contract (Leader-side)

When Leader dispatches a subagent matching the invoke criteria, the dispatch prompt MUST include:

Create meetings/{date}_{topic}.impl-notes.md at the start of your work using the collaboration-skills:agent-impl-notes-log skill format (or have it preloaded via the agent definition's skills: field). Update it incrementally — design decisions, deviations, tradeoffs, open questions. Mark Status: COMPLETE before final report. Include the file path in your report.

Subagent's final report MUST link the impl-notes file. Leader reads it before merging the work to verify decisions match Leader's intent.

Anti-patterns

  • Writing impl-notes at the end as a batch — defeats the purpose; you've already forgotten the context.
  • Logging every minor edit — file is for decisions, not edit history. Trivial mechanical fixes belong in the commit, not here.
  • Using this file instead of the phase meeting log — the two coexist. Phase log is summative, impl-notes is concurrent. Phase log gets archived when sealed; impl-notes can be referenced from the phase log.
  • Sealing the file without resolving 未決 items — open questions must be answered (by Leader/User) or moved to a backlog before status flips to COMPLETE.

Related skills

  • session-to-meeting-log: produces the post-hoc phase meeting log; the two artifacts pair.
  • leader-developer-handoff-contract: defines the dispatch contract; impl-notes is one of its outputs.
  • subagent-review-cycles: when a subagent's work returns for review, Leader reviews the impl-notes alongside the diff.
Files (apple-dev-skills)
  • SKILL.md 5.7 KB
    ---
    name: agent-impl-notes-log
    description: "Keep a running impl-notes file next to the phase meeting log while a subagent executes a task, recording design decisions, intentional deviations from spec, tradeoffs, and open questions as they happen rather than after the fact. Use at the start of any non-trivial subagent dispatch (multi-file change, ambiguous spec, new dependency or module, refactor), when ambiguity is hit mid-task, or before deviating from spec. Not the post-hoc meeting log (session-to-meeting-log); the two coexist."
    argument-hint: "[topic]"
    ---
    
    # Agent Implementation Notes — Running Log
    
    Invoke with a topic argument (frontmatter [`argument-hint: "[topic]"`](https://code.claude.com/docs/en/skills#pass-arguments-to-skills)).
    
    ## Purpose
    
    The phase meeting log (`meetings/{date}_{topic}.md`) is summative — written after work completes. By that point, dozens of micro-decisions made mid-flight are already lost to the commit diff. An impl-notes log fills that gap: a **concurrent record** of decisions, deviations, tradeoffs, and unresolved questions, written as they happen.
    
    ## When to invoke
    
    Subagent MUST invoke this skill at the start of any dispatch matching ANY of:
    
    - Implements behavior whose spec has known ambiguity (e.g., `// UNCONFIRMED` markers, "Unconfirmed ?" prerequisites).
    - Introduces a new dependency, target, or module.
    - Refactors existing code beyond a one-line fix.
    - Any M- or L-size task by your workflow's task-sizing convention, if it has one (touches ≥2 files, adds new behavior, or gets a spec/plan before code).
    
    Subagent MAY skip this skill for trivial one-line fixes, pure typo corrections, or documentation copy edits.
    
    ## File layout
    
    Path: `meetings/{YYYY-MM-DD}_{topic}.impl-notes.md`
    
    Paired naming with the phase meeting log. If the phase log is `meetings/2026-05-20_phase-11-foo.md`, the impl-notes is `meetings/2026-05-20_phase-11-foo.impl-notes.md`.
    
    If multiple subagents work on the same topic on the same day, append a numeric suffix: `meetings/2026-05-20_topic.impl-notes.2.md`.
    
    ## File format
    
    ```markdown
    # Impl Notes — {topic} ({date})
    
    Status: IN_PROGRESS
    Owner: {subagent type, e.g. "Senior Developer"}
    Dispatched by: Leader
    Started: {ISO timestamp}
    
    ## 設計決定 (Design decisions)
    
    _What you chose when the spec was ambiguous. Include the spec reference._
    
    - **{decision name}** — Spec `docs/design.md §X.Y` says "...". Ambiguous on Z. Chose **A** because [reason]. Alternative was B (see §折衷).
    
    ## 偏離 (Deviations)
    
    _Intentional deviations from the documented spec. Include the spec reference and the why._
    
    - **{deviation name}** — Spec says X. Implemented as Y because [reason]. Downstream impact: [what changes for callers / tests / docs].
    
    ## 折衷 (Tradeoffs)
    
    _Alternatives considered and the reasoning for the current pick._
    
    - **{tradeoff topic}** — Considered: [A, B, C]. Picked **B** because [reason]. Rejected A because [reason]; rejected C because [reason].
    
    ## 未決 (Open questions)
    
    _Things you want Leader / User to confirm. Be specific. Block on these before final report if they're load-bearing._
    
    - **{question}** — [specific question]. Default behavior I picked: [X]. Risk if I'm wrong: [impact].
    ```
    
    ## How to update
    
    - **Update incrementally** — write the entry as you make the decision, NOT in a batch at the end. The whole point is to capture context that fades.
    - **Keep entries terse but self-contained** — one bullet should be readable months later without re-reading the diff.
    - **Cite spec sections** by section number (`§How.4.7`) so Leader can verify against the source.
    - **Cross-link related entries** if a 折衷 decision later becomes a 偏離.
    - **Don't duplicate the diff** — the file is for context, not code listings.
    
    ## Status transitions
    
    - `IN_PROGRESS` — work ongoing; file may be edited any time.
    - `COMPLETE` — work finished, ready for Leader review. Set this before reporting back.
    - `BLOCKED` — work paused awaiting Leader/User answer to an §未決 item. Required when an open question is load-bearing.
    
    ## Subagent dispatch contract (Leader-side)
    
    When Leader dispatches a subagent matching the invoke criteria, the dispatch prompt MUST include:
    
    > Create `meetings/{date}_{topic}.impl-notes.md` at the start of your work using the `collaboration-skills:agent-impl-notes-log` skill format (or have it preloaded via the agent definition's [`skills:` field](https://code.claude.com/docs/en/sub-agents#preload-skills-into-subagents)). Update it incrementally — design decisions, deviations, tradeoffs, open questions. Mark `Status: COMPLETE` before final report. Include the file path in your report.
    
    Subagent's final report MUST link the impl-notes file. Leader reads it before merging the work to verify decisions match Leader's intent.
    
    ## Anti-patterns
    
    - **Writing impl-notes at the end as a batch** — defeats the purpose; you've already forgotten the context.
    - **Logging every minor edit** — file is for *decisions*, not edit history. Trivial mechanical fixes belong in the commit, not here.
    - **Using this file instead of the phase meeting log** — the two coexist. Phase log is summative, impl-notes is concurrent. Phase log gets archived when sealed; impl-notes can be referenced from the phase log.
    - **Sealing the file without resolving 未決 items** — open questions must be answered (by Leader/User) or moved to a backlog before status flips to COMPLETE.
    
    ## Related skills
    
    - `session-to-meeting-log`: produces the post-hoc phase meeting log; the two artifacts pair.
    - `leader-developer-handoff-contract`: defines the dispatch contract; impl-notes is one of its outputs.
    - `subagent-review-cycles`: when a subagent's work returns for review, Leader reviews the impl-notes alongside the diff.
    

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation.

No comments yet.

Reviews (0)

No reviews yet.

Related