LLM Mart Basic

Use when assessing the architectural health of a codebase — before a major refactor, when onboarding to an unfamiliar repo, after rapid growth, when planning a redesign, or to surface structural strengths and risks before they become expensive. Not for fixing what it finds, and n

EXPERIMENTAL. Use when looking for meaningfully duplicated logic in a codebase, especially duplicate behavior hidden behind different names, different syntax, different control flow, or independently evolved implementations. Not for style issues, not for syntactic clone detection

EXPERIMENTAL. Use when code needs a security review against the OWASP Top 10:2025 — access control, misconfiguration, supply chain, cryptography, injection, insecure design, authentication, integrity, logging and alerting, and mishandled exceptional conditions. Not for penetratio

Use when reviewing current branch for bugs before pushing or merging, when wanting a thorough multi-agent review of local changes, or when preparing work for human review. Not for codebase structure, not for code style, and not for fixing what it finds.

Use when verifying that requirements/specs/PRDs and their implementation plans match — before starting work, after a spec or plan update, or when suspecting coverage gaps, scope creep, or design drift between intent and action documents. Needs both documents; not for checking cod

Use when working through architectural flaws documented in a .reviews/architecture/ report — selecting which flaws to fix, resuming a partial fix session across multiple sittings, or applying structural changes that need to be tracked back to a report. Not for producing that repo

EXPERIMENTAL. Use when a session is running out of context and the work needs to continue in a fresh one, or when starting a session meant to pick up where an earlier one stopped. Not for compacting in place — that is /compact — and not for specifying work that has not started, w

Use when reviewing a spec, PRD, requirements doc, or design plan before implementation begins — especially when the doc feels too big, bundles unrelated features, may contradict the current codebase, or seems vague, infeasible, or thin on security and error handling. Not for cros

EXPERIMENTAL. Use when options, a recommendation, or an already-chosen approach are on the table and the reasoning under them has not been independently checked — especially when the case rests on cited documentation, remembered behavior, or premises nobody verified. Not for gene

EXPERIMENTAL. Analyzes a repository and any existing test suite, grades existing tests for weakness, classifies mocks, emits a phased roadmap for building a test suite that catches real regressions, then executes those phases one at a time. Use when planning or building a test su

Use when making a small, quick change — a bug fix, typo, minor feature, tweak, or anything the user calls "vibe coding" — that looks like 1-3 files in the same module

Use when auditing a user-facing app — web, mobile (iOS/Android/React Native/Flutter), desktop, CLI, or games — for accessibility barriers or WCAG 2.2 conformance, before shipping UI changes, or in response to concerns about screen-reader, keyboard, low-vision, motor, cognitive, o

Use when assessing the architectural health of a codebase — before a major refactor, when onboarding to an unfamiliar repo, after rapid growth, when planning a redesign, or to surface structural strengths and risks before they become expensive. Not for fixing what it finds, and n

Use when reviewing current branch for bugs before pushing or merging, when wanting a thorough multi-agent review of local changes, or when preparing work for human review. Not for codebase structure, not for code style, and not for fixing what it finds.

Use when verifying that requirements/specs/PRDs and their implementation plans match — before starting work, after a spec or plan update, or when suspecting coverage gaps, scope creep, or design drift between intent and action documents. Needs both documents; not for checking cod

Use when working through architectural flaws documented in a .reviews/architecture/ report — selecting which flaws to fix, resuming a partial fix session across multiple sittings, or applying structural changes that need to be tracked back to a report. Not for producing that repo

EXPERIMENTAL. Use when a session is running out of context and the work needs to continue in a fresh one, or when starting a session meant to pick up where an earlier one stopped. Not for compacting in place — that is /compact — and not for specifying work that has not started, w

Use when reviewing a spec, PRD, requirements doc, or design plan before implementation begins — especially when the doc feels too big, bundles unrelated features, may contradict the current codebase, or seems vague, infeasible, or thin on security and error handling. Not for cros

EXPERIMENTAL. Use when options, a recommendation, or an already-chosen approach are on the table and the reasoning under them has not been independently checked — especially when the case rests on cited documentation, remembered behavior, or premises nobody verified. Not for gene

EXPERIMENTAL. Analyzes a repository and any existing test suite, grades existing tests for weakness, classifies mocks, emits a phased roadmap for building a test suite that catches real regressions, then executes those phases one at a time. Use when planning or building a test su

A green PR, a controller reporting success, and not one line of the new code running

Discover testnet↔mainnet subnet lineage from repo configs and open a PR for review (pass --dry-run to report only)

Triage raw inbox notes into reviewed repository destinations without deleting their sources.

Audit and rewrite content to remove AI writing patterns

Log a completed piece of content to content/log.md after the user confirms it was published.

Validate a dream artifact, review each proposal, and apply only individually accepted changes.

Run a curator pass against the validated memory directory and produce a proposal artifact.

End a session — log what happened, update state and the decision log, propose memory updates, and check for uncommitted or unpushed work

Find relevant context files by topic. Use when you need to load files for a topic without a slash command, or when a task spans multiple domains.

Inventory and migrate selected Gemini CLI workflows with dry-run review and parity checks.

Find repeated workflows in selected Gemini CLI sessions and draft portable skills after review.

Scan multi-session drift and offer individually reviewed fixes only after explicit approval.

Scan orphaned worktrees and stale branches, then offer explicit approval-gated cleanup.

Guided onboarding or import for durable workspace context

Start a session — load state files, flag staleness, and give a briefing on current priorities, deadlines, and blockers

Create a morning heartbeat from repository state and update the local heartbeat log.

Mid-session checkpoint — append progress to today's session log and update state files if a priority shifted, without ending the session

Maintainer-only. Find every file that would newly ship to adopters, classify each one against the written distribution-boundary categories, default to withhold on no clean match, and ask the maintainer only where the taxonomy does not settle it. Drives the release CLI, which refuses to produce a manifest until every shipping file has an answer.

Audit memory, wiki, and auto-loaded files for duplication, conflicting instructions, and stale content. The default path researches, then asks you a single Apply / Discuss / Decline question; on Apply it applies the report, files any out-of-scope problem as a tech-debt issue, then commits, opens a PR, and merges it on a main-branch run like /update-deps. Pass --apply to re-run the apply-and-publish stage against the most recent report.

Fix the tech-debt backlog, a single issue or a recommended related batch, highest severity then oldest first, on a fresh isolated branch through the audit gate, closing the issue(s) on merge. Pass `list` to see the ordered backlog, `why <issue-number>` to explain the recommendation, or a bare `<issue-number>` to fix that issue directly.

Health-check and auto-heal this project's Claude integration, triage, heal, verify, and report an F-to-A+ grade.

Offline-first Python AI agent that runs a tiny research business: quotes each job against its own costs, collects via Stripe, fulfils with NVIDIA Nemotron, pays…

DSH 插件 · 注入式优化器 0.8（主线）：你照常说话，它在你发送后,AI接收前把"这一轮到底要什么"理清楚，再把这份理解交给工作 AI(上下文注入) —— 原话不改写，条条带逐字依据。含控制界面（档位/权限/模型/上下文/只读工具）、拦截浮层（思维层+产出层）与真实 token 用量。可明显提升大多数模型的发挥稳…

Reliable AI Skill + MCP toolkit for agent-driven desktop CAD automation.

Curated real-world use cases for Hermes Agent — the self-improving AI agent from Nous Research. Backed by primary sources.

AI Agent 教学仓库 | 系统化 LangChain、RAG、LangGraph、MCP 全栈实战代码 | 万字博客详解 | 开源可运行示例 | 从零构建智能体

从 0 复刻 WorkBuddy-style 桌面 AI 助手 Harness：24 章 Python 教程，覆盖 Agent Loop、工具调用、记忆系统、Sidecar、沙盒审计、DeepSeek/OpenAI 评测轨迹

MCP server and CLI tools for web search and crawling, built on SearXNG and Crawl4AI

Delta MCP is a free app that sits between your AI apps and their MCP servers: one program per task instead of one tool call per step, up to 24.1× fewer tokens i…

Ava turns any Android 5+ device into a voice-first Home Assistant kiosk. Native C++ under the hood, so a 10-year-old tablet still listens, talks, and runs the h…

Roblox Studio macOS Window Capture Fix 2026: Real Screenshot Tool Instead of Magenta Playtest Glitch

LabTether