LLM Mart Basic

Use when assessing the architectural health of a codebase — before a major refactor, when onboarding to an unfamiliar repo, after rapid growth, when planning a redesign, or to surface structural strengths and risks before they become expensive. Not for fixing what it finds, and n

EXPERIMENTAL. Use when looking for meaningfully duplicated logic in a codebase, especially duplicate behavior hidden behind different names, different syntax, different control flow, or independently evolved implementations. Not for style issues, not for syntactic clone detection

EXPERIMENTAL. Use when code needs a security review against the OWASP Top 10:2025 — access control, misconfiguration, supply chain, cryptography, injection, insecure design, authentication, integrity, logging and alerting, and mishandled exceptional conditions. Not for penetratio

Use when reviewing current branch for bugs before pushing or merging, when wanting a thorough multi-agent review of local changes, or when preparing work for human review. Not for codebase structure, not for code style, and not for fixing what it finds.

Use when verifying that requirements/specs/PRDs and their implementation plans match — before starting work, after a spec or plan update, or when suspecting coverage gaps, scope creep, or design drift between intent and action documents. Needs both documents; not for checking cod

Use when working through architectural flaws documented in a .reviews/architecture/ report — selecting which flaws to fix, resuming a partial fix session across multiple sittings, or applying structural changes that need to be tracked back to a report. Not for producing that repo

EXPERIMENTAL. Use when a session is running out of context and the work needs to continue in a fresh one, or when starting a session meant to pick up where an earlier one stopped. Not for compacting in place — that is /compact — and not for specifying work that has not started, w

Use when reviewing a spec, PRD, requirements doc, or design plan before implementation begins — especially when the doc feels too big, bundles unrelated features, may contradict the current codebase, or seems vague, infeasible, or thin on security and error handling. Not for cros

EXPERIMENTAL. Use when options, a recommendation, or an already-chosen approach are on the table and the reasoning under them has not been independently checked — especially when the case rests on cited documentation, remembered behavior, or premises nobody verified. Not for gene

EXPERIMENTAL. Analyzes a repository and any existing test suite, grades existing tests for weakness, classifies mocks, emits a phased roadmap for building a test suite that catches real regressions, then executes those phases one at a time. Use when planning or building a test su

Use when making a small, quick change — a bug fix, typo, minor feature, tweak, or anything the user calls "vibe coding" — that looks like 1-3 files in the same module

Use when auditing a user-facing app — web, mobile (iOS/Android/React Native/Flutter), desktop, CLI, or games — for accessibility barriers or WCAG 2.2 conformance, before shipping UI changes, or in response to concerns about screen-reader, keyboard, low-vision, motor, cognitive, o

Use when assessing the architectural health of a codebase — before a major refactor, when onboarding to an unfamiliar repo, after rapid growth, when planning a redesign, or to surface structural strengths and risks before they become expensive. Not for fixing what it finds, and n

Use when reviewing current branch for bugs before pushing or merging, when wanting a thorough multi-agent review of local changes, or when preparing work for human review. Not for codebase structure, not for code style, and not for fixing what it finds.

Use when verifying that requirements/specs/PRDs and their implementation plans match — before starting work, after a spec or plan update, or when suspecting coverage gaps, scope creep, or design drift between intent and action documents. Needs both documents; not for checking cod

Use when working through architectural flaws documented in a .reviews/architecture/ report — selecting which flaws to fix, resuming a partial fix session across multiple sittings, or applying structural changes that need to be tracked back to a report. Not for producing that repo

EXPERIMENTAL. Use when a session is running out of context and the work needs to continue in a fresh one, or when starting a session meant to pick up where an earlier one stopped. Not for compacting in place — that is /compact — and not for specifying work that has not started, w

Use when reviewing a spec, PRD, requirements doc, or design plan before implementation begins — especially when the doc feels too big, bundles unrelated features, may contradict the current codebase, or seems vague, infeasible, or thin on security and error handling. Not for cros

EXPERIMENTAL. Use when options, a recommendation, or an already-chosen approach are on the table and the reasoning under them has not been independently checked — especially when the case rests on cited documentation, remembered behavior, or premises nobody verified. Not for gene

EXPERIMENTAL. Analyzes a repository and any existing test suite, grades existing tests for weakness, classifies mocks, emits a phased roadmap for building a test suite that catches real regressions, then executes those phases one at a time. Use when planning or building a test su

A green PR, a controller reporting success, and not one line of the new code running

Generate ranked improvement ideas by scanning the codebase, divergent ideation, adversarial critique, and impact ranking

Full autonomous engineering workflow (plan, build, review, ship)

Transform feature descriptions into well-structured project plans following conventions

Report a bug in the whetstone plugin

Reproduce a GitHub issue bug with visual evidence (browser screenshots, log analysis). Takes a GitHub issue number. For non-issue bug validation, use the bug-reproduction-validator agent.

Resolve PR review comments with cluster analysis and parallel agents. Use when bulk-fixing PR comments after triage.

Perform exhaustive code reviews using multi-agent analysis, ultra-thinking, and worktrees

Diagnose the whetstone environment and configure review agents. Checks CLI dependencies and plugin version, then runs the review-agent wizard that writes whetstone.local.md. Use when onboarding a project, troubleshooting missing tools, or configuring review agents.

Run browser tests on pages affected by current PR or branch

Run pre-PR verification chain: build, types, lint, tests, security scan, diff review

Execute work plans efficiently while maintaining quality and finishing features

Run a dry run first:

Run:

Run:

Create or update an OpenCode skill using the bundled skill-creator workflow

Rebuild the OpenCode skill registry for the current project and installed skills

Session-2 fix loop for Agentation — read structured annotations from the dev overlay and apply targeted UI fixes.

Consume the project's design contract — a .design file or DESIGN.md — and thread its tokens through UI code (CSS, Tailwind, or design-system components).

Fork pov.md for installer taste, or append a one-liner to gotchas.md after a real agent failure.

Audit animation timing, easing, springs, and transitions — decide first whether motion should exist, then apply the motion cluster.

Make any song you can imagine

Leading AI-powered video generation platform that specializes in creating hyper-realistic talking avatars

Hermes Agent is an open-source, self-improving autonomous AI agent developed by Nous Research

Kilo Code is a popular, open-source AI coding agent and "agentic engineering" platform designed to help developers build, refactor, and debug software faster

General-purpose agent in one static Go binary. ReAct loop, ACP server for IDEs, OpenAI-compatible REST API with embedded web UI, Telegram gateway, cron schedule…

Autonomous agent framework with structured memory, safety hooks, and loop management. Built by the agent that runs on it.

TSP自托管、零运维的 A 股「选股 + 监控 + 回测」量化工作台 | 基于 TickFlow 数据源 | LLM能力驱使策略定制+个股分析+复盘 | 自由接入第三方数据源与个性化扩展数据 | 个人开源 ,非TickFlow官方项目

Curated, verified Agent Skills powered by ModelStudio.

Run Claude Code, Codex, Antigravity, Cursor Agent and OpenCode as one runtime — persistent sessions, multi-agent councils, an OpenAI-compatible endpoint, an MCP…

pi had nothing (nothing), so I made something (something) — sorry mariozechner-senpai, I went ahead and lovingly soiled your pure pi for you. opinionated fork o…

A persistent workspace for development work that self-improves and continues beyond one session.

Open-source memory and context for user-aware agents: scoped memory, provenance, retrieval quality, correction, boundaries, evals, and MCP/HTTP access.

📚 A zero-dependency, git-backed micro-lesson library for AI Agents to asynchronously share and search verified debugging experience. Python stdlib only. | http…

Deterministic, local-first memory and guardrails for AI coding agents with no LLM in the hot path.

Deterministic spec-orchestration for local LLMs in the pi coding agent — drives prompts through refine→research→grill→compose→critique, with bundled web/docs/fe…

Native Safari browser automation for AI agents. 97 tools via AppleScript — zero overhead, keeps logins, runs silently in background. Drop-in alternative to Chro…

Agent OS: keep specialist agents in a hub, spin up a temporary orchestrator per task. Local-first, works with any model.

Git for agent memory. Branches, diffs, PRs, and rollback for what your agents know.

Multi-Provider AI Gateway - No personal logs by design. Model autodiscovery, Failover groups, High availability, Android companion app, and more - "Because we h…

Production-grade MCP server for MikroTik RouterOS with secure AI-native network automation.