GitHub collection
yha9806/academic-writing-toolkit
Imported from GitHub — is this yours?
21 skills imported from this repository.
evidence-review
Build evidence-controlled literature reviews and gap maps with source-status labels, claim registers, citation-role plans, traceability tables, and overclaim audits. Use when drafting or auditing review papers, thesis literature reviews, scoping reviews, or evidence syntheses whe
human-eval-handoff-repair
Use when validating, repairing, or mapping human-evaluation handoff packages, filled annotation CSVs, rebuttal annotation UIs, or reviewer annotation returns across package versions. Applies to checking row alignment, detecting cross-snapshot contamination, converting old labels
logic-review
Review stable chapter or manuscript drafts for paragraph flow, transitions, argument continuity, and repeated rhetorical functions before editing. Use after the author-approved spine is stable; route structural drift back to thesis-control.
manuscript-reframe
Reframe report-like academic drafts into paper-form scientific arguments while preserving or explicitly renegotiating author intent; requires an approved old-versus-proposed spine, evidence and argument baselines, analysis-role control, and post-edit drift review.
peer-review
Review another author's manuscript, paper, thesis chapter, proposal, or preprint as an external reviewer. Use when asked to evaluate novelty, significance, gap-contribution fit, claim-evidence adequacy, methods, evaluation, overclaim risks, structure, writing, required revisions,
release-governance
Use when preparing, auditing, releasing, PDF-hardening, or rebuttal-hardening academic manuscripts, datasets, artifacts, reviewer packets, or claim registers involving multiple refs, local assets, human labels, agent-assisted drafts, wide tables, figure provenance, submission PDF
revision-escalation
Stop repeated failed writing, coding, manuscript, rebuttal, or restructuring revisions when the same issue has gone through 3+ unsatisfactory edits, vague feedback such as still wrong/weird/unclear/weak/越改越乱, version contamination, or possible gap/claim/evidence/venue-fit drift.
self-review
Review the user's own manuscript, paper, thesis chapter, rebuttal, or release packet with clean-room anti-contamination controls and, when needed, an unfamiliar-reader comprehension gate. Use for internal review, readiness checks, reviewer simulation, or claim-evidence self-audit
thesis-control
Use when AI-assisted thesis or manuscript edits risk claim drift, scope creep, loss of intended use, experiment-role promotion, or repeated revisions that fail to converge; provides author-intent control, lightweight or strict contracts, drift audits, revision escalation, and hum
verify-refs
Use when checking BibTeX reference records for missing fields, malformed identifiers, duplicate keys, or metadata mismatches before submission.