ChatGPT Claude Codex CLI Cohere Cursor DeepSeek Gemini GitHub Copilot GLM Grok Kimi Llama MiniMax Mistral OpenAI opencode Skill

test-fixing

Systematically identify and fix all failing tests using smart grouping strategies. Use when explicitly asks to fix tests ("fix these tests", "make tests pass"), reports test failures ("tests are failing", "test suite is broken"), or completes implementation and wants tests passin

LLM Mart · 0 points · 14 views 0 listing impressions 0 install-command copies
Virus-scanned Reviewed automatically before listing.

Full trust report

Download sickn33-agentic-awesome-skills-skills_test-fixing-286166a.zip · 1 KB
Part of sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills — 427 skills
This skill couldn't be refreshed from GitHub on the last check — you're seeing the last imported snapshot.

Install

skills CLI npx skills add https://github.com/sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills/tree/main/skills/test-fixing
Claude Code claude plugin marketplace add https://llmmart.ai/marketplace.json && claude plugin install sickn33-agentic-awesome-skills@llmmart
Git git clone https://github.com/sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills.git

The skills CLI installs just this skill, for any of its supported agents. Claude Code installs the whole sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills collection as a plugin from our marketplace. Git is the plain clone.

Skill manifest

Test Fixing

Systematically identify and fix all failing tests using smart grouping strategies.

When to Use

  • Explicitly asks to fix tests ("fix these tests", "make tests pass")
  • Reports test failures ("tests are failing", "test suite is broken")
  • Completes implementation and wants tests passing
  • Mentions CI/CD failures due to tests

Systematic Approach

1. Initial Test Run

Run make test to identify all failing tests.

Analyze output for:

  • Total number of failures
  • Error types and patterns
  • Affected modules/files

2. Smart Error Grouping

Group similar failures by:

  • Error type: ImportError, AttributeError, AssertionError, etc.
  • Module/file: Same file causing multiple test failure
  • Root cause: Missing dependencies, API changes, refactoring impacts

Prioritize groups by:

  • Number of affected tests (highest impact first)
  • Dependency order (fix infrastructure before functionality)

3. Systematic Fixing Process

For each group (starting with highest impact):

  1. Identify root cause

    • Read relevant code
    • Check recent changes with git diff
    • Understand the error pattern
  2. Implement fix

    • Use Edit tool for code changes
    • Follow project conventions (see CLAUDE.md)
    • Make minimal, focused changes
  3. Verify fix

    • Run subset of tests for this group
    • Use pytest markers or file patterns:
      uv run pytest tests/path/to/test_file.py -v
      uv run pytest -k "pattern" -v
      
    • Ensure group passes before moving on
  4. Move to next group

4. Fix Order Strategy

Infrastructure first:

  • Import errors
  • Missing dependencies
  • Configuration issues

Then API changes:

  • Function signature changes
  • Module reorganization
  • Renamed variables/functions

Finally, logic issues:

  • Assertion failures
  • Business logic bugs
  • Edge case handling

5. Final Verification

After all groups fixed:

  • Run complete test suite: make test
  • Verify no regressions
  • Check test coverage remains intact

Best Practices

  • Fix one group at a time
  • Run focused tests after each fix
  • Use git diff to understand recent changes
  • Look for patterns in failures
  • Don't move to next group until current passes
  • Keep changes minimal and focused

Example Workflow

User: "The tests are failing after my refactor"

  1. Run make test → 15 failures identified
  2. Group errors:
    • 8 ImportErrors (module renamed)
    • 5 AttributeErrors (function signature changed)
    • 2 AssertionErrors (logic bugs)
  3. Fix ImportErrors first → Run subset → Verify
  4. Fix AttributeErrors → Run subset → Verify
  5. Fix AssertionErrors → Run subset → Verify
  6. Run full suite → All pass ✓

Limitations

  • Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
  • Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
  • Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.
Files (agentic-awesome-skills)
  • SKILL.md 3.3 KB
    ---
    name: test-fixing
    description: "Systematically identify and fix all failing tests using smart grouping strategies. Use when explicitly asks to fix tests (\"fix these tests\", \"make tests pass\"), reports test failures (\"tests are failing\", \"test suite is broken\"), or completes implementation and wants tests passing."
    risk: safe
    source: community
    date_added: "2026-02-27"
    ---
    
    # Test Fixing
    
    Systematically identify and fix all failing tests using smart grouping strategies.
    
    ## When to Use
    - Explicitly asks to fix tests ("fix these tests", "make tests pass")
    - Reports test failures ("tests are failing", "test suite is broken")
    - Completes implementation and wants tests passing
    - Mentions CI/CD failures due to tests
    
    ## Systematic Approach
    
    ### 1. Initial Test Run
    
    Run `make test` to identify all failing tests.
    
    Analyze output for:
    
    - Total number of failures
    - Error types and patterns
    - Affected modules/files
    
    ### 2. Smart Error Grouping
    
    Group similar failures by:
    
    - **Error type**: ImportError, AttributeError, AssertionError, etc.
    - **Module/file**: Same file causing multiple test failure
    - **Root cause**: Missing dependencies, API changes, refactoring impacts
    
    Prioritize groups by:
    
    - Number of affected tests (highest impact first)
    - Dependency order (fix infrastructure before functionality)
    
    ### 3. Systematic Fixing Process
    
    For each group (starting with highest impact):
    
    1. **Identify root cause**
    
       - Read relevant code
       - Check recent changes with `git diff`
       - Understand the error pattern
    
    2. **Implement fix**
    
       - Use Edit tool for code changes
       - Follow project conventions (see CLAUDE.md)
       - Make minimal, focused changes
    
    3. **Verify fix**
    
       - Run subset of tests for this group
       - Use pytest markers or file patterns:
         ```bash
         uv run pytest tests/path/to/test_file.py -v
         uv run pytest -k "pattern" -v
         ```
       - Ensure group passes before moving on
    
    4. **Move to next group**
    
    ### 4. Fix Order Strategy
    
    **Infrastructure first:**
    
    - Import errors
    - Missing dependencies
    - Configuration issues
    
    **Then API changes:**
    
    - Function signature changes
    - Module reorganization
    - Renamed variables/functions
    
    **Finally, logic issues:**
    
    - Assertion failures
    - Business logic bugs
    - Edge case handling
    
    ### 5. Final Verification
    
    After all groups fixed:
    
    - Run complete test suite: `make test`
    - Verify no regressions
    - Check test coverage remains intact
    
    ## Best Practices
    
    - Fix one group at a time
    - Run focused tests after each fix
    - Use `git diff` to understand recent changes
    - Look for patterns in failures
    - Don't move to next group until current passes
    - Keep changes minimal and focused
    
    ## Example Workflow
    
    User: "The tests are failing after my refactor"
    
    1. Run `make test` → 15 failures identified
    2. Group errors:
       - 8 ImportErrors (module renamed)
       - 5 AttributeErrors (function signature changed)
       - 2 AssertionErrors (logic bugs)
    3. Fix ImportErrors first → Run subset → Verify
    4. Fix AttributeErrors → Run subset → Verify
    5. Fix AssertionErrors → Run subset → Verify
    6. Run full suite → All pass ✓
    
    ## Limitations
    - Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
    - Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
    - Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.
    

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation.

No comments yet.

Reviews (0)

No reviews yet.

Related