m11-ecosystem
Use when integrating crates or ecosystem questions. Keywords: E0425, E0433, E0603, crate, cargo, dependency, feature flag, workspace, which crate to use, using external C libraries, creating Python extensions, PyO3, wasm, WebAssembly, bindgen, cbindgen, napi-rs, cannot find, priv
Install
npx skills add https://github.com/moeru-ai/auv/tree/main/.agents/skills/m11-ecosystem
claude plugin marketplace add https://llmmart.ai/marketplace.json && claude plugin install moeru-ai-auv@llmmart
git clone https://github.com/moeru-ai/auv.git
The skills CLI installs just this skill, for any of its supported agents. Claude Code installs the whole moeru-ai/auv collection as a plugin from our marketplace. Git is the plain clone.
Skill manifest
Current Dependencies (Auto-Injected)
!grep -A 100 '^\[dependencies\]' Cargo.toml 2>/dev/null | head -30 || echo "No Cargo.toml found"
Ecosystem Integration
Layer 2: Design Choices
Core Question
What's the right crate for this job, and how should it integrate?
Before adding dependencies:
- Is there a standard solution?
- What's the maintenance status?
- What's the API stability?
Integration Decision → Implementation
| Need | Choice | Crates |
|---|---|---|
| Serialization | Derive-based | serde, serde_json |
| Async runtime | tokio or async-std | tokio (most popular) |
| HTTP client | Ergonomic | reqwest |
| HTTP server | Modern | axum, actix-web |
| Database | SQL or ORM | sqlx, diesel |
| CLI parsing | Derive-based | clap |
| Error handling | App vs lib | anyhow, thiserror |
| Logging | Facade | tracing, log |
Thinking Prompt
Before adding a dependency:
Is it well-maintained?
- Recent commits?
- Active issue response?
- Breaking changes frequency?
What's the scope?
- Do you need the full crate or just a feature?
- Can feature flags reduce bloat?
How does it integrate?
- Trait-based or concrete types?
- Sync or async?
- What bounds does it require?
Trace Up ↑
To domain constraints (Layer 3):
"Which HTTP framework should I use?"
↑ Ask: What are the performance requirements?
↑ Check: domain-web (latency, throughput needs)
↑ Check: Team expertise (familiarity with framework)
| Question | Trace To | Ask |
|---|---|---|
| Framework choice | domain-* | What constraints matter? |
| Library vs build | domain-* | What's the deployment model? |
| API design | domain-* | Who are the consumers? |
Trace Down ↓
To implementation (Layer 1):
"Integrate external crate"
↓ m04-zero-cost: Trait bounds and generics
↓ m06-error-handling: Error type compatibility
"FFI integration"
↓ unsafe-checker: Safety requirements
↓ m12-lifecycle: Resource cleanup
Quick Reference
Language Interop
| Integration | Crate/Tool | Use Case |
|---|---|---|
| C/C++ → Rust | bindgen |
Auto-generate bindings |
| Rust → C | cbindgen |
Export C headers |
| Python ↔ Rust | pyo3 |
Python extensions |
| Node.js ↔ Rust | napi-rs |
Node addons |
| WebAssembly | wasm-bindgen |
Browser/WASI |
Cargo Features
| Feature | Purpose |
|---|---|
[features] |
Optional functionality |
default = [...] |
Default features |
feature = "serde" |
Conditional deps |
[workspace] |
Multi-crate projects |
Error Code Reference
| Error | Cause | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| E0433 | Can't find crate | Add to Cargo.toml |
| E0603 | Private item | Check crate docs |
| Feature not enabled | Optional feature | Enable in features |
| Version conflict | Incompatible deps | cargo update or pin |
| Duplicate types | Different crate versions | Unify in workspace |
Crate Selection Criteria
| Criterion | Good Sign | Warning Sign |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance | Recent commits | Years inactive |
| Community | Active issues/PRs | No response |
| Documentation | Examples, API docs | Minimal docs |
| Stability | Semantic versioning | Frequent breaking |
| Dependencies | Minimal, well-known | Heavy, obscure |
Anti-Patterns
| Anti-Pattern | Why Bad | Better |
|---|---|---|
extern crate |
Outdated (2018+) | Just use |
#[macro_use] |
Global pollution | Explicit import |
Wildcard deps * |
Unpredictable | Specific versions |
| Too many deps | Supply chain risk | Evaluate necessity |
| Vendoring everything | Maintenance burden | Trust crates.io |
Related Skills
| When | See |
|---|---|
| Error type design | m06-error-handling |
| Trait integration | m04-zero-cost |
| FFI safety | unsafe-checker |
| Resource management | m12-lifecycle |
Files (auv)
-
SKILL.md 4.4 KB
--- name: m11-ecosystem description: "Use when integrating crates or ecosystem questions. Keywords: E0425, E0433, E0603, crate, cargo, dependency, feature flag, workspace, which crate to use, using external C libraries, creating Python extensions, PyO3, wasm, WebAssembly, bindgen, cbindgen, napi-rs, cannot find, private, crate recommendation, best crate for, Cargo.toml, features, crate 推荐, 依赖管理, 特性标志, 工作空间, Python 绑定" user-invocable: false --- ## Current Dependencies (Auto-Injected) !`grep -A 100 '^\[dependencies\]' Cargo.toml 2>/dev/null | head -30 || echo "No Cargo.toml found"` --- # Ecosystem Integration > **Layer 2: Design Choices** ## Core Question **What's the right crate for this job, and how should it integrate?** Before adding dependencies: - Is there a standard solution? - What's the maintenance status? - What's the API stability? --- ## Integration Decision → Implementation | Need | Choice | Crates | |------|--------|--------| | Serialization | Derive-based | serde, serde_json | | Async runtime | tokio or async-std | tokio (most popular) | | HTTP client | Ergonomic | reqwest | | HTTP server | Modern | axum, actix-web | | Database | SQL or ORM | sqlx, diesel | | CLI parsing | Derive-based | clap | | Error handling | App vs lib | anyhow, thiserror | | Logging | Facade | tracing, log | --- ## Thinking Prompt Before adding a dependency: 1. **Is it well-maintained?** - Recent commits? - Active issue response? - Breaking changes frequency? 2. **What's the scope?** - Do you need the full crate or just a feature? - Can feature flags reduce bloat? 3. **How does it integrate?** - Trait-based or concrete types? - Sync or async? - What bounds does it require? --- ## Trace Up ↑ To domain constraints (Layer 3): ``` "Which HTTP framework should I use?" ↑ Ask: What are the performance requirements? ↑ Check: domain-web (latency, throughput needs) ↑ Check: Team expertise (familiarity with framework) ``` | Question | Trace To | Ask | |----------|----------|-----| | Framework choice | domain-* | What constraints matter? | | Library vs build | domain-* | What's the deployment model? | | API design | domain-* | Who are the consumers? | --- ## Trace Down ↓ To implementation (Layer 1): ``` "Integrate external crate" ↓ m04-zero-cost: Trait bounds and generics ↓ m06-error-handling: Error type compatibility "FFI integration" ↓ unsafe-checker: Safety requirements ↓ m12-lifecycle: Resource cleanup ``` --- ## Quick Reference ### Language Interop | Integration | Crate/Tool | Use Case | |-------------|------------|----------| | C/C++ → Rust | `bindgen` | Auto-generate bindings | | Rust → C | `cbindgen` | Export C headers | | Python ↔ Rust | `pyo3` | Python extensions | | Node.js ↔ Rust | `napi-rs` | Node addons | | WebAssembly | `wasm-bindgen` | Browser/WASI | ### Cargo Features | Feature | Purpose | |---------|---------| | `[features]` | Optional functionality | | `default = [...]` | Default features | | `feature = "serde"` | Conditional deps | | `[workspace]` | Multi-crate projects | ## Error Code Reference | Error | Cause | Fix | |-------|-------|-----| | E0433 | Can't find crate | Add to Cargo.toml | | E0603 | Private item | Check crate docs | | Feature not enabled | Optional feature | Enable in `features` | | Version conflict | Incompatible deps | `cargo update` or pin | | Duplicate types | Different crate versions | Unify in workspace | --- ## Crate Selection Criteria | Criterion | Good Sign | Warning Sign | |-----------|-----------|--------------| | Maintenance | Recent commits | Years inactive | | Community | Active issues/PRs | No response | | Documentation | Examples, API docs | Minimal docs | | Stability | Semantic versioning | Frequent breaking | | Dependencies | Minimal, well-known | Heavy, obscure | --- ## Anti-Patterns | Anti-Pattern | Why Bad | Better | |--------------|---------|--------| | `extern crate` | Outdated (2018+) | Just `use` | | `#[macro_use]` | Global pollution | Explicit import | | Wildcard deps `*` | Unpredictable | Specific versions | | Too many deps | Supply chain risk | Evaluate necessity | | Vendoring everything | Maintenance burden | Trust crates.io | --- ## Related Skills | When | See | |------|-----| | Error type design | m06-error-handling | | Trait integration | m04-zero-cost | | FFI safety | unsafe-checker | | Resource management | m12-lifecycle |
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation.
Reviews (0)
No reviews yet.
No comments yet.