define-goal
Help the user define a concrete, measurable goal before starting work, especially when they ask to use the goal tool, create a goal, set an objective, clarify success criteria, or turn a fuzzy intention into a quantitative outcome. Use this skill for goal creation and goal refine
Install
npx skills add https://github.com/openai/skills/tree/main/skills/.curated/define-goal
claude plugin marketplace add https://llmmart.ai/marketplace.json && claude plugin install openai-skills@llmmart
git clone https://github.com/openai/skills.git
The skills CLI installs just this skill, for any of its supported agents. Claude Code installs the whole openai/skills collection as a plugin from our marketplace. Git is the plain clone.
Skill manifest
Define Goal
Overview
Shape the user's intent into an objective an agent can pursue honestly. Prefer measurable outcomes, explicit evidence, and bounded scope over activity descriptions.
This skill covers goal definition and goal-tool creation only. Do not create intermediate planning artifacts, durable snapshots, ledgers, decision logs, or resume files from this skill.
Workflow
Confirm that goal definition is actually needed.
- Use this skill when the user asks for
$define-goal, asks to create or set a goal, asks for the goal tool, or wants help turning an intention into a clear objective. - If the user only asks for ordinary implementation work, do the work directly instead of forcing goal creation.
- Use this skill when the user asks for
Restate the likely goal in concrete terms. A usable goal names:
- the specific outcome that will be true
- the main artifact, system, repo, environment, or user-facing behavior involved
- how completion will be verified
- what is in scope
- what is out of scope when ambiguity would matter
- the stop condition for asking the user instead of grinding
Make it quantitative when the domain supports it. Prefer numbers that represent real success, not decorative precision:
- pass/fail validators: exact tests, checks, CI jobs, evals, commands, or acceptance criteria
- quality thresholds: latency, error rate, cost, accuracy, recall, precision, coverage, flake rate, bundle size, memory, uptime, completion rate, or manual review criteria
- artifact constraints: file paths, affected modules, allowed commands, output formats, target environments, deadlines, or maximum blast radius
- evidence counts: number of reproduced failures, successful reruns, reviewed examples, migrated records, addressed comments, or verified cases
Repair weak goals before setting them.
- Rewrite vague goals into measurable objectives when local context makes the rewrite safe.
- Ask one concise clarification question when the missing detail changes the intended outcome or validation.
- Reject pure activity goals such as "make progress," "keep investigating," "improve things," or "work on X" unless they are sharpened into a verifiable outcome.
Check active goal state before creating a goal.
- Call
get_goal. - If there is no active goal and the objective meets the quality bar, call
create_goal. - If there is an active goal that still matches the user's intent, continue using it instead of creating a duplicate.
- If there is an active goal that conflicts with the new request, ask whether to finish the current goal, mark it complete if done, or start a separate goal-backed thread.
- Call
Create the goal only after it passes the quality bar.
- Use a single concise objective string.
- Include the verification evidence in the objective itself.
- Include scope bounds when they constrain the work.
- Include a token budget only when the user explicitly requested one.
- Do not call
create_goalfor an ordinary multi-step task unless the user explicitly asked for goal-backed work.
Goal Quality Bar
Before create_goal, the objective should answer:
- What concrete thing will be true when this is done?
- What evidence will prove it?
- What quantitative or binary threshold defines success?
- What scope boundaries matter?
- What should cause the agent to stop and ask?
Good:
Reduce checkout API p95 latency below 250 ms for the documented slow path by making the smallest safe server-side change, then verify with
npm run test:checkoutand the existing local latency benchmark showing p95 under 250 ms across 3 consecutive runs.
Good:
Resolve the open review comments on PR 123 that request code changes, update only the affected auth files and tests, and verify with the targeted auth test command plus
gh pr view 123showing no unresolved change-request threads.
Weak:
Make checkout faster.
Weak:
Keep investigating the PR comments.
Quantification Heuristics
- For bugs, define success as reproduction first, fix second, and a failing-then-passing validator when possible.
- For tests, name the exact command and required pass condition.
- For performance, name the metric, target threshold, measurement method, and number of runs.
- For quality work, define an observable acceptance bar such as reviewed examples, lint/typecheck/test pass, or user-approved artifact.
- For research, define the decision the research must enable, the sources or systems in scope, and the evidence standard.
- For operations, define healthy state, monitoring window, failure threshold, and rollback or escalation trigger.
Clarifying Questions
Ask only when a reasonable rewrite would risk pursuing the wrong outcome. Keep the question short and oriented around the missing validator or scope boundary.
Useful question shapes:
- "What metric should define success here: latency, cost, accuracy, or user-visible behavior?"
- "Which environment should I verify against: local, staging, or production?"
- "What is the minimum evidence you want before I mark this goal complete?"
If the user cannot provide a metric, propose the most honest binary validator available and ask for confirmation.
Files (skills)
-
agents
-
openai.yaml 208 B
interface: display_name: "Define Goal" short_description: "Shape clear measurable goals" default_prompt: "Use $define-goal to turn this intention into a concrete, measurable goal before starting work."
-
-
LICENSE.txt 10.5 KB
Apache License Version 2.0, January 2004 http://www.apache.org/licenses/ TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR USE, REPRODUCTION, AND DISTRIBUTION 1. Definitions. "License" shall mean the terms and conditions for use, reproduction, and distribution as defined by Sections 1 through 9 of this document. "Licensor" shall mean the copyright owner or entity authorized by the copyright owner that is granting the License. "Legal Entity" shall mean the union of the acting entity and all other entities that control, are controlled by, or are under common control with that entity. For the purposes of this definition, "control" means (i) the power, direct or indirect, to cause the direction or management of such entity, whether by contract or otherwise, or (ii) ownership of fifty percent (50%) or more of the outstanding shares, or (iii) beneficial ownership of such entity. "You" (or "Your") shall mean an individual or Legal Entity exercising permissions granted by this License. "Source" form shall mean the preferred form for making modifications, including but not limited to software source code, documentation source, and configuration files. "Object" form shall mean any form resulting from mechanical transformation or translation of a Source form, including but not limited to compiled object code, generated documentation, and conversions to other media types. "Work" shall mean the work of authorship, whether in Source or Object form, made available under the License, as indicated by a copyright notice that is included in or attached to the work (an example is provided in the Appendix below). "Derivative Works" shall mean any work, whether in Source or Object form, that is based on (or derived from) the Work and for which the editorial revisions, annotations, elaborations, or other modifications represent, as a whole, an original work of authorship. For the purposes of this License, Derivative Works shall not include works that remain separable from, or merely link (or bind by name) to the interfaces of, the Work and Derivative Works thereof. "Contribution" shall mean any work of authorship, including the original version of the Work and any modifications or additions to that Work or Derivative Works thereof, that is intentionally submitted to Licensor for inclusion in the Work by the copyright owner or by an individual or Legal Entity authorized to submit on behalf of the copyright owner. For the purposes of this definition, "submitted" means any form of electronic, verbal, or written communication sent to the Licensor or its representatives, including but not limited to communication on electronic mailing lists, source code control systems, and issue tracking systems that are managed by, or on behalf of, the Licensor for the purpose of discussing and improving the Work, but excluding communication that is conspicuously marked or otherwise designated in writing by the copyright owner as "Not a Contribution." "Contributor" shall mean Licensor and any individual or Legal Entity on behalf of whom a Contribution has been received by Licensor and subsequently incorporated within the Work. 2. Grant of Copyright License. Subject to the terms and conditions of this License, each Contributor hereby grants to You a perpetual, worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable copyright license to reproduce, prepare Derivative Works of, publicly display, publicly perform, sublicense, and distribute the Work and such Derivative Works in Source or Object form. 3. Grant of Patent License. Subject to the terms and conditions of this License, each Contributor hereby grants to You a perpetual, worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable (except as stated in this section) patent license to make, have made, use, offer to sell, sell, import, and otherwise transfer the Work, where such license applies only to those patent claims licensable by such Contributor that are necessarily infringed by their Contribution(s) alone or by combination of their Contribution(s) with the Work to which such Contribution(s) was submitted. If You institute patent litigation against any entity (including a cross-claim or counterclaim in a lawsuit) alleging that the Work or a Contribution incorporated within the Work constitutes direct or contributory patent infringement, then any patent licenses granted to You under this License for that Work shall terminate as of the date such litigation is filed. 4. Redistribution. You may reproduce and distribute copies of the Work or Derivative Works thereof in any medium, with or without modifications, and in Source or Object form, provided that You meet the following conditions: (a) You must give any other recipients of the Work or Derivative Works a copy of this License; and (b) You must cause any modified files to carry prominent notices stating that You changed the files; and (c) You must retain, in the Source form of any Derivative Works that You distribute, all copyright, patent, trademark, and attribution notices from the Source form of the Work, excluding those notices that do not pertain to any part of the Derivative Works; and (d) If the Work includes a "NOTICE" text file as part of its distribution, then any Derivative Works that You distribute must include a readable copy of the attribution notices contained within such NOTICE file, excluding those notices that do not pertain to any part of the Derivative Works, in at least one of the following places: within a NOTICE text file distributed as part of the Derivative Works; within the Source form or documentation, if provided along with the Derivative Works; or, within a display generated by the Derivative Works, if and wherever such third-party notices normally appear. The contents of the NOTICE file are for informational purposes only and do not modify the License. You may add Your own attribution notices within Derivative Works that You distribute, alongside or as an addendum to the NOTICE text from the Work, provided that such additional attribution notices cannot be construed as modifying the License. You may add Your own copyright statement to Your modifications and may provide additional or different license terms and conditions for use, reproduction, or distribution of Your modifications, or for any such Derivative Works as a whole, provided Your use, reproduction, and distribution of the Work otherwise complies with the conditions stated in this License. 5. Submission of Contributions. Unless You explicitly state otherwise, any Contribution intentionally submitted for inclusion in the Work by You to the Licensor shall be under the terms and conditions of this License, without any additional terms or conditions. Notwithstanding the above, nothing herein shall supersede or modify the terms of any separate license agreement you may have executed with Licensor regarding such Contributions. 6. Trademarks. This License does not grant permission to use the trade names, trademarks, service marks, or product names of the Licensor, except as required for reasonable and customary use in describing the origin of the Work and reproducing the content of the NOTICE file. 7. Disclaimer of Warranty. Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, Licensor provides the Work (and each Contributor provides its Contributions) on an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied, including, without limitation, any warranties or conditions of TITLE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, MERCHANTABILITY, or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. You are solely responsible for determining the appropriateness of using or redistributing the Work and assume any risks associated with Your exercise of permissions under this License. 8. Limitation of Liability. In no event and under no legal theory, whether in tort (including negligence), contract, or otherwise, unless required by applicable law (such as deliberate and grossly negligent acts) or agreed to in writing, shall any Contributor be liable to You for damages, including any direct, indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages of any character arising as a result of this License or out of the use or inability to use the Work (including but not limited to damages for loss of goodwill, work stoppage, computer failure or malfunction, or any and all other commercial damages or losses), even if such Contributor has been advised of the possibility of such damages. 9. Accepting Warranty or Additional Liability. While redistributing the Work or Derivative Works thereof, You may choose to offer, and charge a fee for, acceptance of support, warranty, indemnity, or other liability obligations and/or rights consistent with this License. However, in accepting such obligations, You may act only on Your own behalf and on Your sole responsibility, not on behalf of any other Contributor, and only if You agree to indemnify, defend, and hold each Contributor harmless for any liability incurred by, or claims asserted against, such Contributor by reason of your accepting any such warranty or additional liability. END OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS APPENDIX: How to apply the Apache License to your work. To apply the Apache License to your work, attach the following boilerplate notice, with the fields enclosed by brackets "[]" replaced with your own identifying information. (Don\'t include the brackets!) The text should be enclosed in the appropriate comment syntax for the file format. We also recommend that a file or class name and description of purpose be included on the same "printed page" as the copyright notice for easier identification within third-party archives. Copyright [yyyy] [name of copyright owner] Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the specific language governing permissions and limitations under the License. -
SKILL.md 5.5 KB
--- name: define-goal description: Help the user define a concrete, measurable goal before starting work, especially when they ask to use the goal tool, create a goal, set an objective, clarify success criteria, or turn a fuzzy intention into a quantitative outcome. Use this skill for goal creation and goal refinement only; it does not manage durable snapshots, decision logs, or long-running execution artifacts. --- # Define Goal ## Overview Shape the user's intent into an objective an agent can pursue honestly. Prefer measurable outcomes, explicit evidence, and bounded scope over activity descriptions. This skill covers goal definition and goal-tool creation only. Do not create intermediate planning artifacts, durable snapshots, ledgers, decision logs, or resume files from this skill. ## Workflow 1. Confirm that goal definition is actually needed. - Use this skill when the user asks for `$define-goal`, asks to create or set a goal, asks for the goal tool, or wants help turning an intention into a clear objective. - If the user only asks for ordinary implementation work, do the work directly instead of forcing goal creation. 2. Restate the likely goal in concrete terms. A usable goal names: - the specific outcome that will be true - the main artifact, system, repo, environment, or user-facing behavior involved - how completion will be verified - what is in scope - what is out of scope when ambiguity would matter - the stop condition for asking the user instead of grinding 3. Make it quantitative when the domain supports it. Prefer numbers that represent real success, not decorative precision: - pass/fail validators: exact tests, checks, CI jobs, evals, commands, or acceptance criteria - quality thresholds: latency, error rate, cost, accuracy, recall, precision, coverage, flake rate, bundle size, memory, uptime, completion rate, or manual review criteria - artifact constraints: file paths, affected modules, allowed commands, output formats, target environments, deadlines, or maximum blast radius - evidence counts: number of reproduced failures, successful reruns, reviewed examples, migrated records, addressed comments, or verified cases 4. Repair weak goals before setting them. - Rewrite vague goals into measurable objectives when local context makes the rewrite safe. - Ask one concise clarification question when the missing detail changes the intended outcome or validation. - Reject pure activity goals such as "make progress," "keep investigating," "improve things," or "work on X" unless they are sharpened into a verifiable outcome. 5. Check active goal state before creating a goal. - Call `get_goal`. - If there is no active goal and the objective meets the quality bar, call `create_goal`. - If there is an active goal that still matches the user's intent, continue using it instead of creating a duplicate. - If there is an active goal that conflicts with the new request, ask whether to finish the current goal, mark it complete if done, or start a separate goal-backed thread. 6. Create the goal only after it passes the quality bar. - Use a single concise objective string. - Include the verification evidence in the objective itself. - Include scope bounds when they constrain the work. - Include a token budget only when the user explicitly requested one. - Do not call `create_goal` for an ordinary multi-step task unless the user explicitly asked for goal-backed work. ## Goal Quality Bar Before `create_goal`, the objective should answer: - What concrete thing will be true when this is done? - What evidence will prove it? - What quantitative or binary threshold defines success? - What scope boundaries matter? - What should cause the agent to stop and ask? Good: > Reduce checkout API p95 latency below 250 ms for the documented slow path by making the smallest safe server-side change, then verify with `npm run test:checkout` and the existing local latency benchmark showing p95 under 250 ms across 3 consecutive runs. Good: > Resolve the open review comments on PR 123 that request code changes, update only the affected auth files and tests, and verify with the targeted auth test command plus `gh pr view 123` showing no unresolved change-request threads. Weak: > Make checkout faster. Weak: > Keep investigating the PR comments. ## Quantification Heuristics - For bugs, define success as reproduction first, fix second, and a failing-then-passing validator when possible. - For tests, name the exact command and required pass condition. - For performance, name the metric, target threshold, measurement method, and number of runs. - For quality work, define an observable acceptance bar such as reviewed examples, lint/typecheck/test pass, or user-approved artifact. - For research, define the decision the research must enable, the sources or systems in scope, and the evidence standard. - For operations, define healthy state, monitoring window, failure threshold, and rollback or escalation trigger. ## Clarifying Questions Ask only when a reasonable rewrite would risk pursuing the wrong outcome. Keep the question short and oriented around the missing validator or scope boundary. Useful question shapes: - "What metric should define success here: latency, cost, accuracy, or user-visible behavior?" - "Which environment should I verify against: local, staging, or production?" - "What is the minimum evidence you want before I mark this goal complete?" If the user cannot provide a metric, propose the most honest binary validator available and ask for confirmation.
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation.
Reviews (0)
No reviews yet.
No comments yet.