Cursor Skill

creating-pr

Create a clean, review-ready pull request with a good title, structured description, linked issues, and appropriate reviewers.

LLM Mart · 0 points · 22 views 0 listing impressions 0 install-command copies
Virus-scanned Reviewed automatically before listing.

Full trust report

Download spencerpauly-awesome-cursor-skills-resources_creating-pr-99cd265.zip · 1 KB
Part of spencerpauly/awesome-cursor-skills — 65 skills

Install

skills CLI npx skills add https://github.com/spencerpauly/awesome-cursor-skills/tree/main/resources/creating-pr
Claude Code claude plugin marketplace add https://llmmart.ai/marketplace.json && claude plugin install spencerpauly-awesome-cursor-skills@llmmart
Git git clone https://github.com/spencerpauly/awesome-cursor-skills.git

The skills CLI installs just this skill, for any of its supported agents. Claude Code installs the whole spencerpauly/awesome-cursor-skills collection as a plugin from our marketplace. Git is the plain clone.

Skill manifest

Creating a PR

Package work into a pull request that's easy to review and merge.

Workflow

1. Prepare the Branch

Before creating the PR:

# Ensure branch is up to date with base
git fetch origin
git rebase origin/main  # or merge, depending on project convention

# Check what will be in the PR
git log origin/main..HEAD --oneline
git diff origin/main --stat

Squash fixup commits if the project prefers clean history. Keep logical commits separate if the project prefers granular history.

2. Write the Title

Format: <type>: <short description>

Type When
feat New feature
fix Bug fix
refactor Code change that neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature
docs Documentation only
test Adding or fixing tests
chore Build, CI, deps, or tooling
perf Performance improvement

Examples:

  • feat: add dark mode toggle to settings page
  • fix: prevent duplicate form submissions on checkout
  • refactor: extract auth middleware into shared module

3. Write the Description

Use this structure:

## Summary

1-3 sentences explaining what this PR does and why.

Closes #123

## Changes

- Added `ThemeToggle` component with system/light/dark options
- Updated `Layout` to read theme from context
- Added theme persistence to localStorage

## Test Plan

- [ ] Toggle between light/dark/system themes
- [ ] Refresh page — theme persists
- [ ] Check no flash of unstyled content on load

4. Self-Review

Before requesting review:

  • Read every line of the diff yourself
  • Remove debug code (console.log, TODO, commented-out code)
  • Verify tests pass: npm test
  • Verify types: npx tsc --noEmit
  • Verify lint: npm run lint
  • Check for files that shouldn't be committed (.env, lockfile conflicts)

5. Create the PR

git push -u origin HEAD
gh pr create --title "<title>" --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
## Summary
...

## Changes
...

## Test Plan
...
EOF
)"

6. Request Review

  • Tag the appropriate reviewers (code owners, domain experts)
  • If the PR is large (>400 lines), add a comment explaining the best order to review files
  • If the PR depends on another PR, note it in the description
  • Label the PR appropriately (feature, bug, breaking change, etc.)

Tips

  • Small PRs get reviewed faster — aim for <300 lines changed
  • If a PR is too big, split it into stacked PRs
  • Screenshots/recordings for UI changes make review much faster
  • Draft PRs are useful for early feedback before the work is complete
Files (awesome-cursor-skills)
  • SKILL.md 2.7 KB
    ---
    name: creating-pr
    description: Create a clean, review-ready pull request with a good title, structured description, linked issues, and appropriate reviewers.
    user-invocable: true
    ---
    
    # Creating a PR
    
    Package work into a pull request that's easy to review and merge.
    
    ## Workflow
    
    ### 1. Prepare the Branch
    
    Before creating the PR:
    
    ```bash
    # Ensure branch is up to date with base
    git fetch origin
    git rebase origin/main  # or merge, depending on project convention
    
    # Check what will be in the PR
    git log origin/main..HEAD --oneline
    git diff origin/main --stat
    ```
    
    Squash fixup commits if the project prefers clean history. Keep logical commits separate if the project prefers granular history.
    
    ### 2. Write the Title
    
    Format: `<type>: <short description>`
    
    | Type | When |
    |------|------|
    | `feat` | New feature |
    | `fix` | Bug fix |
    | `refactor` | Code change that neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature |
    | `docs` | Documentation only |
    | `test` | Adding or fixing tests |
    | `chore` | Build, CI, deps, or tooling |
    | `perf` | Performance improvement |
    
    Examples:
    - `feat: add dark mode toggle to settings page`
    - `fix: prevent duplicate form submissions on checkout`
    - `refactor: extract auth middleware into shared module`
    
    ### 3. Write the Description
    
    Use this structure:
    
    ```markdown
    ## Summary
    
    1-3 sentences explaining what this PR does and why.
    
    Closes #123
    
    ## Changes
    
    - Added `ThemeToggle` component with system/light/dark options
    - Updated `Layout` to read theme from context
    - Added theme persistence to localStorage
    
    ## Test Plan
    
    - [ ] Toggle between light/dark/system themes
    - [ ] Refresh page — theme persists
    - [ ] Check no flash of unstyled content on load
    ```
    
    ### 4. Self-Review
    
    Before requesting review:
    - Read every line of the diff yourself
    - Remove debug code (`console.log`, `TODO`, commented-out code)
    - Verify tests pass: `npm test`
    - Verify types: `npx tsc --noEmit`
    - Verify lint: `npm run lint`
    - Check for files that shouldn't be committed (`.env`, lockfile conflicts)
    
    ### 5. Create the PR
    
    ```bash
    git push -u origin HEAD
    gh pr create --title "<title>" --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
    ## Summary
    ...
    
    ## Changes
    ...
    
    ## Test Plan
    ...
    EOF
    )"
    ```
    
    ### 6. Request Review
    
    - Tag the appropriate reviewers (code owners, domain experts)
    - If the PR is large (>400 lines), add a comment explaining the best order to review files
    - If the PR depends on another PR, note it in the description
    - Label the PR appropriately (feature, bug, breaking change, etc.)
    
    ## Tips
    
    - Small PRs get reviewed faster — aim for <300 lines changed
    - If a PR is too big, split it into stacked PRs
    - Screenshots/recordings for UI changes make review much faster
    - Draft PRs are useful for early feedback before the work is complete
    

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation.

No comments yet.

Reviews (0)

No reviews yet.

Related