ast-grep
Guide for writing ast-grep rules to perform structural code search and analysis. Use when users need to search codebases using Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) patterns, find specific code structures, or perform complex code queries that go beyond simple text search. This skill should
Install
npx skills add https://github.com/moeru-ai/auv/tree/main/.agents/skills/ast-grep
claude plugin marketplace add https://llmmart.ai/marketplace.json && claude plugin install moeru-ai-auv@llmmart
git clone https://github.com/moeru-ai/auv.git
The skills CLI installs just this skill, for any of its supported agents. Claude Code installs the whole moeru-ai/auv collection as a plugin from our marketplace. Git is the plain clone.
Skill manifest
ast-grep Code Search
Overview
This skill helps translate natural language queries into ast-grep rules for structural code search. ast-grep uses Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) patterns to match code based on its structure rather than just text, enabling powerful and precise code search across large codebases.
When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when users:
- Need to search for code patterns using structural matching (e.g., "find all async functions that don't have error handling")
- Want to locate specific language constructs (e.g., "find all function calls with specific parameters")
- Request searches that require understanding code structure rather than just text
- Ask to search for code with particular AST characteristics
- Need to perform complex code queries that traditional text search cannot handle
General Workflow
Follow this process to help users write effective ast-grep rules:
Step 1: Understand the Query
Clearly understand what the user wants to find. Ask clarifying questions if needed:
- What specific code pattern or structure are they looking for?
- Which programming language?
- Are there specific edge cases or variations to consider?
- What should be included or excluded from matches?
Step 2: Create Example Code
Write a simple code snippet that represents what the user wants to match. Save this to a temporary file for testing.
Example: If searching for "async functions that use await", create a test file:
// test_example.js
async function example() {
const result = await fetchData();
return result;
}
Step 3: Write the ast-grep Rule
Translate the pattern into an ast-grep rule. Start simple and add complexity as needed.
Key principles:
- Always use
stopBy: endfor relational rules (inside,has) to ensure search goes to the end of the direction - Use
patternfor simple structures - Use
kindwithhas/insidefor complex structures - Break complex queries into smaller sub-rules using
all,any, ornot
Example rule file (test_rule.yml):
id: async-with-await
language: javascript
rule:
kind: function_declaration
has:
pattern: await $EXPR
stopBy: end
See references/rule_reference.md for comprehensive rule documentation.
Step 4: Test the Rule
Use ast-grep CLI to verify the rule matches the example code. There are two main approaches:
Option A: Test with inline rules (for quick iterations)
echo "async function test() { await fetch(); }" | ast-grep scan --inline-rules "id: test
language: javascript
rule:
kind: function_declaration
has:
pattern: await \$EXPR
stopBy: end" --stdin
Option B: Test with rule files (recommended for complex rules)
ast-grep scan --rule test_rule.yml test_example.js
Debugging if no matches:
- Simplify the rule (remove sub-rules)
- Add
stopBy: endto relational rules if not present - Use
--debug-queryto understand the AST structure (see below) - Check if
kindvalues are correct for the language
Step 5: Search the Codebase
Once the rule matches the example code correctly, search the actual codebase:
For simple pattern searches:
ast-grep run --pattern 'console.log($ARG)' --lang javascript /path/to/project
For complex rule-based searches:
ast-grep scan --rule my_rule.yml /path/to/project
For inline rules (without creating files):
ast-grep scan --inline-rules "id: my-rule
language: javascript
rule:
pattern: \$PATTERN" /path/to/project
ast-grep CLI Commands
Inspect Code Structure (--debug-query)
Dump the AST structure to understand how code is parsed:
ast-grep run --pattern 'async function example() { await fetch(); }' \
--lang javascript \
--debug-query=cst
Available formats:
cst: Concrete Syntax Tree (shows all nodes including punctuation)ast: Abstract Syntax Tree (shows only named nodes)pattern: Shows how ast-grep interprets your pattern
Use this to:
- Find the correct
kindvalues for nodes - Understand the structure of code you want to match
- Debug why patterns aren't matching
Example:
# See the structure of your target code
ast-grep run --pattern 'class User { constructor() {} }' \
--lang javascript \
--debug-query=cst
# See how ast-grep interprets your pattern
ast-grep run --pattern 'class $NAME { $$$BODY }' \
--lang javascript \
--debug-query=pattern
Test Rules (scan with --stdin)
Test a rule against code snippet without creating files:
echo "const x = await fetch();" | ast-grep scan --inline-rules "id: test
language: javascript
rule:
pattern: await \$EXPR" --stdin
Add --json for structured output:
echo "const x = await fetch();" | ast-grep scan --inline-rules "..." --stdin --json
Search with Patterns (run)
Simple pattern-based search for single AST node matches:
# Basic pattern search
ast-grep run --pattern 'console.log($ARG)' --lang javascript .
# Search specific files
ast-grep run --pattern 'class $NAME' --lang python /path/to/project
# JSON output for programmatic use
ast-grep run --pattern 'function $NAME($$$)' --lang javascript --json .
When to use:
- Simple, single-node matches
- Quick searches without complex logic
- When you don't need relational rules (inside/has)
Search with Rules (scan)
YAML rule-based search for complex structural queries:
# With rule file
ast-grep scan --rule my_rule.yml /path/to/project
# With inline rules
ast-grep scan --inline-rules "id: find-async
language: javascript
rule:
kind: function_declaration
has:
pattern: await \$EXPR
stopBy: end" /path/to/project
# JSON output
ast-grep scan --rule my_rule.yml --json /path/to/project
When to use:
- Complex structural searches
- Relational rules (inside, has, precedes, follows)
- Composite logic (all, any, not)
- When you need the power of full YAML rules
Tip: For relational rules (inside/has), always add stopBy: end to ensure complete traversal.
Tips for Writing Effective Rules
Always Use stopBy: end
For relational rules, always use stopBy: end unless there's a specific reason not to:
has:
pattern: await $EXPR
stopBy: end
This ensures the search traverses the entire subtree rather than stopping at the first non-matching node.
Start Simple, Then Add Complexity
Begin with the simplest rule that could work:
- Try a
patternfirst - If that doesn't work, try
kindto match the node type - Add relational rules (
has,inside) as needed - Combine with composite rules (
all,any,not) for complex logic
Use the Right Rule Type
- Pattern: For simple, direct code matching (e.g.,
console.log($ARG)) - Kind + Relational: For complex structures (e.g., "function containing await")
- Composite: For logical combinations (e.g., "function with await but not in try-catch")
Debug with AST Inspection
When rules don't match:
- Use
--debug-query=cstto see the actual AST structure - Check if metavariables are being detected correctly
- Verify the node
kindmatches what you expect - Ensure relational rules are searching in the right direction
Escaping in Inline Rules
When using --inline-rules, escape metavariables in shell commands:
- Use
\$VARinstead of$VAR(shell interprets$as variable) - Or use single quotes:
'$VAR'works in most shells
Example:
# Correct: escaped $
ast-grep scan --inline-rules "rule: {pattern: 'console.log(\$ARG)'}" .
# Or use single quotes
ast-grep scan --inline-rules 'rule: {pattern: "console.log($ARG)"}' .
Common Use Cases
Find Functions with Specific Content
Find async functions that use await:
ast-grep scan --inline-rules "id: async-await
language: javascript
rule:
all:
- kind: function_declaration
- has:
pattern: await \$EXPR
stopBy: end" /path/to/project
Find Code Inside Specific Contexts
Find console.log inside class methods:
ast-grep scan --inline-rules "id: console-in-class
language: javascript
rule:
pattern: console.log(\$\$\$)
inside:
kind: method_definition
stopBy: end" /path/to/project
Find Code Missing Expected Patterns
Find async functions without try-catch:
ast-grep scan --inline-rules "id: async-no-trycatch
language: javascript
rule:
all:
- kind: function_declaration
- has:
pattern: await \$EXPR
stopBy: end
- not:
has:
pattern: try { \$\$\$ } catch (\$E) { \$\$\$ }
stopBy: end" /path/to/project
Resources
references/
Contains detailed documentation for ast-grep rule syntax:
rule_reference.md: Comprehensive ast-grep rule documentation covering atomic rules, relational rules, composite rules, and metavariables
Load these references when detailed rule syntax information is needed.
Files (auv)
-
references
-
rule_reference.md 10.4 KB
# ast-grep Rule Reference This document provides comprehensive documentation for ast-grep rule syntax, covering all rule types and metavariables. ## Introduction to ast-grep Rules ast-grep rules are declarative specifications for matching and filtering Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) nodes. They enable structural code search and analysis by defining conditions an AST node must meet to be matched. ### Rule Categories ast-grep rules are categorized into three types: * **Atomic Rules**: Match individual AST nodes based on intrinsic properties like code patterns (`pattern`), node type (`kind`), or text content (`regex`). * **Relational Rules**: Define conditions based on a target node's position or relationship to other nodes (e.g., `inside`, `has`, `precedes`, `follows`). * **Composite Rules**: Combine other rules using logical operations (AND, OR, NOT) to form complex matching criteria (e.g., `all`, `any`, `not`, `matches`). ## Anatomy of an ast-grep Rule Object The ast-grep rule object is the core configuration unit defining how ast-grep identifies and filters AST nodes. It's typically written in YAML format. ### General Structure Every field within an ast-grep Rule Object is optional, but at least one "positive" key (e.g., `kind`, `pattern`) must be present. A node matches a rule if it satisfies all fields defined within that rule object, implying an implicit logical AND operation. For rules using metavariables that depend on prior matching, explicit `all` composite rules are recommended to guarantee execution order. ### Rule Object Properties | Property | Type | Category | Purpose | Example | | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | | `pattern` | String or Object | Atomic | Matches AST node by code pattern. | `pattern: console.log($ARG)` | | `kind` | String | Atomic | Matches AST node by its kind name. | `kind: call_expression` | | `regex` | String | Atomic | Matches node's text by Rust regex. | `regex: ^[a-z]+$` | | `nthChild` | number, string, Object | Atomic | Matches nodes by their index within parent's children. | `nthChild: 1` | | `range` | RangeObject | Atomic | Matches node by character-based start/end positions. | `range: { start: { line: 0, column: 0 }, end: { line: 0, column: 10 } }` | | `inside` | Object | Relational | Target node must be inside node matching sub-rule. | `inside: { pattern: class $C { $$$ }, stopBy: end }` | | `has` | Object | Relational | Target node must have descendant matching sub-rule. | `has: { pattern: await $EXPR, stopBy: end }` | | `precedes` | Object | Relational | Target node must appear before node matching sub-rule. | `precedes: { pattern: return $VAL }` | | `follows` | Object | Relational | Target node must appear after node matching sub-rule. | `follows: { pattern: import $M from '$P' }` | | `all` | Array<Rule> | Composite | Matches if all sub-rules match. | `all: [ { kind: call_expression }, { pattern: foo($A) } ]` | | `any` | Array<Rule> | Composite | Matches if any sub-rules match. | `any: [ { pattern: foo() }, { pattern: bar() } ]` | | `not` | Object | Composite | Matches if sub-rule does not match. | `not: { pattern: console.log($ARG) }` | | `matches` | String | Composite | Matches if predefined utility rule matches. | `matches: my-utility-rule-id` | ## Atomic Rules Atomic rules match individual AST nodes based on their intrinsic properties. ### pattern: String and Object Forms The `pattern` rule matches a single AST node based on a code pattern. **String Pattern**: Directly matches using ast-grep's pattern syntax with metavariables. ```yaml pattern: console.log($ARG) ``` **Object Pattern**: Offers granular control for ambiguous patterns or specific contexts. * `selector`: Pinpoints a specific part of the parsed pattern to match. ```yaml pattern: selector: field_definition context: class { $F } ``` * `context`: Provides surrounding code context for correct parsing. * `strictness`: Modifies the pattern's matching algorithm (`cst`, `smart`, `ast`, `relaxed`, `signature`). ```yaml pattern: context: foo($BAR) strictness: relaxed ``` ### kind: Matching by Node Type The `kind` rule matches an AST node by its `tree_sitter_node_kind` name, derived from the language's Tree-sitter grammar. Useful for targeting constructs like `call_expression` or `function_declaration`. ```yaml kind: call_expression ``` ### regex: Text-Based Node Matching The `regex` rule matches the entire text content of an AST node using a Rust regular expression. It's not a "positive" rule, meaning it matches any node whose text satisfies the regex, regardless of its structural kind. ### nthChild: Positional Node Matching The `nthChild` rule finds nodes by their 1-based index within their parent's children list, counting only named nodes by default. * `number`: Matches the exact nth child. Example: `nthChild: 1` * `string`: Matches positions using An+B formula. Example: `2n+1` * `Object`: Provides granular control: * `position`: `number` or An+B string. * `reverse`: `true` to count from the end. * `ofRule`: An ast-grep rule to filter the sibling list before counting. ### range: Position-Based Node Matching The `range` rule matches an AST node based on its character-based start and end positions. A `RangeObject` defines `start` and `end` fields, each with 0-based `line` and `column`. `start` is inclusive, `end` is exclusive. ## Relational Rules Relational rules filter targets based on their position relative to other AST nodes. They can include `stopBy` and `field` options. ### inside: Matching Within a Parent Node Requires the target node to be inside another node matching the `inside` sub-rule. ```yaml inside: pattern: class $C { $$$ } stopBy: end ``` ### has: Matching with a Descendant Node Requires the target node to have a descendant node matching the `has` sub-rule. ```yaml has: pattern: await $EXPR stopBy: end ``` ### precedes and follows: Sequential Node Matching * `precedes`: Target node must appear before a node matching the `precedes` sub-rule. * `follows`: Target node must appear after a node matching the `follows` sub-rule. Both include `stopBy` but not `field`. ### stopBy and field: Refining Relational Searches **stopBy**: Controls search termination for relational rules. * `"neighbor"` (default): Stops when immediate surrounding node doesn't match. * `"end"`: Searches to the end of the direction (root for `inside`, leaf for `has`). * `Rule object`: Stops when a surrounding node matches the provided rule (inclusive). **field**: Specifies a sub-node within the target node that should match the relational rule. Only for `inside` and `has`. **Best Practice**: When unsure, always use `stopBy: end` to ensure the search goes to the end of the direction. ## Composite Rules Composite rules combine atomic and relational rules using logical operations. ### all: Conjunction (AND) of Rules Matches a node only if all sub-rules in the list match. Guarantees order of rule matching, important for metavariables. ```yaml all: - kind: call_expression - pattern: console.log($ARG) ``` ### any: Disjunction (OR) of Rules Matches a node if any sub-rules in the list match. ```yaml any: - pattern: console.log($ARG) - pattern: console.warn($ARG) - pattern: console.error($ARG) ``` ### not: Negation (NOT) of a Rule Matches a node if the single sub-rule does not match. ```yaml not: pattern: console.log($ARG) ``` ### matches: Rule Reuse and Utility Rules Takes a rule-id string, matching if the referenced utility rule matches. Enables rule reuse and recursive rules. ## Metavariables Metavariables are placeholders in patterns to match dynamic content in the AST. ### $VAR: Single Named Node Capture Captures a single named node in the AST. * **Valid**: `$META`, `$META_VAR`, `$_` * **Invalid**: `$invalid`, `$123`, `$KEBAB-CASE` * **Example**: `console.log($GREETING)` matches `console.log('Hello World')`. * **Reuse**: `$A == $A` matches `a == a` but not `a == b`. ### $$VAR: Single Unnamed Node Capture Captures a single unnamed node (e.g., operators, punctuation). **Example**: To match the operator in `a + b`, use `$$OP`. ```yaml rule: kind: binary_expression has: field: operator pattern: $$OP ``` ### $$$MULTI_META_VARIABLE: Multi-Node Capture Matches zero or more AST nodes (non-greedy). Useful for variable numbers of arguments or statements. * **Example**: `console.log($$$)` matches `console.log()`, `console.log('hello')`, and `console.log('debug:', key, value)`. * **Example**: `function $FUNC($$$ARGS) { $$$ }` matches functions with varying parameters/statements. ### Non-Capturing Metavariables (_VAR) Metavariables starting with an underscore (`_`) are not captured. They can match different content even if named identically, optimizing performance. * **Example**: `$_FUNC($_FUNC)` matches `test(a)` and `testFunc(1 + 1)`. ### Important Considerations for Metavariable Detection * **Syntax Matching**: Only exact metavariable syntax (e.g., `$A`, `$$B`, `$$$C`) is recognized. * **Exclusive Content**: Metavariable text must be the only text within an AST node. * **Non-working**: `obj.on$EVENT`, `"Hello $WORLD"`, `a $OP b`, `$jq`. The ast-grep playground is useful for debugging patterns and visualizing metavariables. ## Common Patterns and Examples ### Finding Functions with Specific Content Find functions that contain await expressions: ```yaml rule: kind: function_declaration has: pattern: await $EXPR stopBy: end ``` ### Finding Code Inside Specific Contexts Find console.log calls inside class methods: ```yaml rule: pattern: console.log($$$) inside: kind: method_definition stopBy: end ``` ### Combining Multiple Conditions Find async functions that use await but don't have try-catch: ```yaml rule: all: - kind: function_declaration - has: pattern: await $EXPR stopBy: end - not: has: pattern: try { $$$ } catch ($E) { $$$ } stopBy: end ``` ### Matching Multiple Alternatives Find any type of console method call: ```yaml rule: any: - pattern: console.log($$$) - pattern: console.warn($$$) - pattern: console.error($$$) - pattern: console.debug($$$) ``` ## Troubleshooting Tips 1. **Rule doesn't match**: Use `dump_syntax_tree` to see the actual AST structure 2. **Relational rule issues**: Ensure `stopBy: end` is set for deep searches 3. **Wrong node kind**: Check the language's Tree-sitter grammar for correct kind names 4. **Metavariable not working**: Ensure it's the only content in its AST node 5. **Pattern too complex**: Break it down into simpler sub-rules using `all`
-
-
SKILL.md 9.2 KB
--- name: ast-grep description: Guide for writing ast-grep rules to perform structural code search and analysis. Use when users need to search codebases using Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) patterns, find specific code structures, or perform complex code queries that go beyond simple text search. This skill should be used when users ask to search for code patterns, find specific language constructs, or locate code with particular structural characteristics. --- # ast-grep Code Search ## Overview This skill helps translate natural language queries into ast-grep rules for structural code search. ast-grep uses Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) patterns to match code based on its structure rather than just text, enabling powerful and precise code search across large codebases. ## When to Use This Skill Use this skill when users: - Need to search for code patterns using structural matching (e.g., "find all async functions that don't have error handling") - Want to locate specific language constructs (e.g., "find all function calls with specific parameters") - Request searches that require understanding code structure rather than just text - Ask to search for code with particular AST characteristics - Need to perform complex code queries that traditional text search cannot handle ## General Workflow Follow this process to help users write effective ast-grep rules: ### Step 1: Understand the Query Clearly understand what the user wants to find. Ask clarifying questions if needed: - What specific code pattern or structure are they looking for? - Which programming language? - Are there specific edge cases or variations to consider? - What should be included or excluded from matches? ### Step 2: Create Example Code Write a simple code snippet that represents what the user wants to match. Save this to a temporary file for testing. **Example:** If searching for "async functions that use await", create a test file: ```javascript // test_example.js async function example() { const result = await fetchData(); return result; } ``` ### Step 3: Write the ast-grep Rule Translate the pattern into an ast-grep rule. Start simple and add complexity as needed. **Key principles:** - Always use `stopBy: end` for relational rules (`inside`, `has`) to ensure search goes to the end of the direction - Use `pattern` for simple structures - Use `kind` with `has`/`inside` for complex structures - Break complex queries into smaller sub-rules using `all`, `any`, or `not` **Example rule file (test_rule.yml):** ```yaml id: async-with-await language: javascript rule: kind: function_declaration has: pattern: await $EXPR stopBy: end ``` See `references/rule_reference.md` for comprehensive rule documentation. ### Step 4: Test the Rule Use ast-grep CLI to verify the rule matches the example code. There are two main approaches: **Option A: Test with inline rules (for quick iterations)** ```bash echo "async function test() { await fetch(); }" | ast-grep scan --inline-rules "id: test language: javascript rule: kind: function_declaration has: pattern: await \$EXPR stopBy: end" --stdin ``` **Option B: Test with rule files (recommended for complex rules)** ```bash ast-grep scan --rule test_rule.yml test_example.js ``` **Debugging if no matches:** 1. Simplify the rule (remove sub-rules) 2. Add `stopBy: end` to relational rules if not present 3. Use `--debug-query` to understand the AST structure (see below) 4. Check if `kind` values are correct for the language ### Step 5: Search the Codebase Once the rule matches the example code correctly, search the actual codebase: **For simple pattern searches:** ```bash ast-grep run --pattern 'console.log($ARG)' --lang javascript /path/to/project ``` **For complex rule-based searches:** ```bash ast-grep scan --rule my_rule.yml /path/to/project ``` **For inline rules (without creating files):** ```bash ast-grep scan --inline-rules "id: my-rule language: javascript rule: pattern: \$PATTERN" /path/to/project ``` ## ast-grep CLI Commands ### Inspect Code Structure (--debug-query) Dump the AST structure to understand how code is parsed: ```bash ast-grep run --pattern 'async function example() { await fetch(); }' \ --lang javascript \ --debug-query=cst ``` **Available formats:** - `cst`: Concrete Syntax Tree (shows all nodes including punctuation) - `ast`: Abstract Syntax Tree (shows only named nodes) - `pattern`: Shows how ast-grep interprets your pattern **Use this to:** - Find the correct `kind` values for nodes - Understand the structure of code you want to match - Debug why patterns aren't matching **Example:** ```bash # See the structure of your target code ast-grep run --pattern 'class User { constructor() {} }' \ --lang javascript \ --debug-query=cst # See how ast-grep interprets your pattern ast-grep run --pattern 'class $NAME { $$$BODY }' \ --lang javascript \ --debug-query=pattern ``` ### Test Rules (scan with --stdin) Test a rule against code snippet without creating files: ```bash echo "const x = await fetch();" | ast-grep scan --inline-rules "id: test language: javascript rule: pattern: await \$EXPR" --stdin ``` **Add --json for structured output:** ```bash echo "const x = await fetch();" | ast-grep scan --inline-rules "..." --stdin --json ``` ### Search with Patterns (run) Simple pattern-based search for single AST node matches: ```bash # Basic pattern search ast-grep run --pattern 'console.log($ARG)' --lang javascript . # Search specific files ast-grep run --pattern 'class $NAME' --lang python /path/to/project # JSON output for programmatic use ast-grep run --pattern 'function $NAME($$$)' --lang javascript --json . ``` **When to use:** - Simple, single-node matches - Quick searches without complex logic - When you don't need relational rules (inside/has) ### Search with Rules (scan) YAML rule-based search for complex structural queries: ```bash # With rule file ast-grep scan --rule my_rule.yml /path/to/project # With inline rules ast-grep scan --inline-rules "id: find-async language: javascript rule: kind: function_declaration has: pattern: await \$EXPR stopBy: end" /path/to/project # JSON output ast-grep scan --rule my_rule.yml --json /path/to/project ``` **When to use:** - Complex structural searches - Relational rules (inside, has, precedes, follows) - Composite logic (all, any, not) - When you need the power of full YAML rules **Tip:** For relational rules (inside/has), always add `stopBy: end` to ensure complete traversal. ## Tips for Writing Effective Rules ### Always Use stopBy: end For relational rules, always use `stopBy: end` unless there's a specific reason not to: ```yaml has: pattern: await $EXPR stopBy: end ``` This ensures the search traverses the entire subtree rather than stopping at the first non-matching node. ### Start Simple, Then Add Complexity Begin with the simplest rule that could work: 1. Try a `pattern` first 2. If that doesn't work, try `kind` to match the node type 3. Add relational rules (`has`, `inside`) as needed 4. Combine with composite rules (`all`, `any`, `not`) for complex logic ### Use the Right Rule Type - **Pattern**: For simple, direct code matching (e.g., `console.log($ARG)`) - **Kind + Relational**: For complex structures (e.g., "function containing await") - **Composite**: For logical combinations (e.g., "function with await but not in try-catch") ### Debug with AST Inspection When rules don't match: 1. Use `--debug-query=cst` to see the actual AST structure 2. Check if metavariables are being detected correctly 3. Verify the node `kind` matches what you expect 4. Ensure relational rules are searching in the right direction ### Escaping in Inline Rules When using `--inline-rules`, escape metavariables in shell commands: - Use `\$VAR` instead of `$VAR` (shell interprets `$` as variable) - Or use single quotes: `'$VAR'` works in most shells **Example:** ```bash # Correct: escaped $ ast-grep scan --inline-rules "rule: {pattern: 'console.log(\$ARG)'}" . # Or use single quotes ast-grep scan --inline-rules 'rule: {pattern: "console.log($ARG)"}' . ``` ## Common Use Cases ### Find Functions with Specific Content Find async functions that use await: ```bash ast-grep scan --inline-rules "id: async-await language: javascript rule: all: - kind: function_declaration - has: pattern: await \$EXPR stopBy: end" /path/to/project ``` ### Find Code Inside Specific Contexts Find console.log inside class methods: ```bash ast-grep scan --inline-rules "id: console-in-class language: javascript rule: pattern: console.log(\$\$\$) inside: kind: method_definition stopBy: end" /path/to/project ``` ### Find Code Missing Expected Patterns Find async functions without try-catch: ```bash ast-grep scan --inline-rules "id: async-no-trycatch language: javascript rule: all: - kind: function_declaration - has: pattern: await \$EXPR stopBy: end - not: has: pattern: try { \$\$\$ } catch (\$E) { \$\$\$ } stopBy: end" /path/to/project ``` ## Resources ### references/ Contains detailed documentation for ast-grep rule syntax: - `rule_reference.md`: Comprehensive ast-grep rule documentation covering atomic rules, relational rules, composite rules, and metavariables Load these references when detailed rule syntax information is needed.
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation.
Reviews (0)
No reviews yet.
No comments yet.